Custom as a Source of Legal Regulation of Property Relations in the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.127.6.114-122
Abstract
The paper discusses the issue of the use of custom in the regulation of property relations. The author analyzes the possibility of determining the content of subjective property rights by customary legal norms, namely, such powers as the use and disposal. Attention is focused on the influence of customs on the formation of the owner’s discretion in the exercise of his subjective rights, in particular, the following questions are investigated: on what or on whom does this “discretion” depend? Is it possible that customs influence the formation of the discretion of a particular owner? Special attention is paid to the establishment of limits for the exercise of property rights under customary legal norms. According to the author, applying custom in the regulation of public relations, the owner of a property right does not go beyond the legal field, since custom is a source of law, and in this case one should speak of “discretion within the current legislation” and “discretion beyond it.” The paper concludes that customs can determine the content of subjective property rights, methods of protecting property rights, in particular self-defense issues, and are more often used in the regulation of real legal relations based on private ownership, while customs cannot contradict the peremptory norms. It is emphasized that a special role in the regulation of property relations is assigned to local customs.
About the Author
Ya. N. KaravaevaRussian Federation
Yana N. Karavaeva, Senior Lecturer, Department of Civil Law and Procedure
References
1. Vorms A. E. Primenenie obychaya k nasledovaniyu v lichnoj sobstvennosti na nadel’nye zemli. — Yaroslavl’ : Tip. gub. pravl., 1912. — 30 s.
2. Grazhdanskoe pravo : uchebnik : v 4 t. / otv. red. E. A. Suhanov. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M. : Statut, 2019. — T. 1 : Obshchaya chast’. — 576 s.
3. Efimenko P. E. Yuridicheskie znaki : monografiya. — SPb. : Tipografiya V. S. Balasheva i K°, 1874. — 86 s.
4. Kamyshanskij V. P. Pravo sobstvennosti: predely i ogranicheniya. — M. : Zakon i pravo; Yuniti-Dana, 2000. — 303 s.
5. Madzhidova B. Narodnye tradicii i obychai kak sredstvo formirovaniya nravstvennyh kachestv detej v sem’e : avtoref. dis. ... d-ra ped. nauk. — Dushanbe, 2004. — 23 s.
6. Pahman S. V. Obychnoe grazhdanskoe pravo v Rossii / pod red. i s predisl. V. A. Tomsinova. — M. : Zercalo, 2003. — 736 s.
7. Russkie krest’yane. Zhizn’. Byt. Nravy : materialy Etnograficheskogo byuro knyazya V. N. Tenisheva / Ministerstvo kul’tury RF, Rossijskij etnograficheskij muzej ; [nauch. red.: D. A. Baranov, A. V. Konovalov, kand. istor. nauk]. — SPb. : Delovaya poligrafiya, 2004. — 30 s.
8. Caregorodskaya E. V. Pravovoj obychaj: sushchnost’ i mekhanizm dejstviya : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — SPb., 2004.
9. Shershenevich G. F. Obshchaya teoriya prava : uchebnoe posobie : v 2 t. — M., 1995. — T. 2.
Review
For citations:
Karavaeva Ya.N. Custom as a Source of Legal Regulation of Property Relations in the Russian Federation. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(6):114-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.127.6.114-122