Head of Department as a Capacity Triad: Manager, Teacher, Researcher

The paper attempts to comprehend the legal status of the head of a department with the identification of the most significant areas of his activities. The author considers the basics of the labor law status of the head of the department of a Russian university, and studies their correlation with the legal norms of France and Germany using a comparative approach. A review of strategic approaches to filling the position of the head of the department has been carried out. The models of organizational behavior of the head of a department, his leadership styles, methods of department management are analyzed. A model of the qualities of the head of a department of the university has been built, attention is given to professional competence, as well as the system of its constituent competencies. The characteristic of the pedagogical function of the head of a department is given, a reasoned opinion is expressed about the growth of its role in the conditions of digitalization of education. The scientific component of the manager’s functional is considered through the prism of criteria for an academic degree, academic title, membership in dissertation councils, scientific management of graduate students, undergraduates, etc. The role of the head of the department as the leader of the scientific school is shown. The author expresses an opinion about the need to increase the importance of departments in Russian universities, reduce the teaching load of heads of departments, legitimize the positions of their deputies, etc. It is concluded that the head of a department is a "universal soldier" who performs almost all functions in an educational organization, he is called upon to become an effective manager, while remaining a successful teacher and famous scientist.

1. Alaverdov A. R., Alaverdova T. P. Zaveduyushchij kafedroj sovremennogo vuza: uchenyj, pedagog, administrator? // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. — 2013. — № 5. — S. 51—57.

2. Grahov V. P., Mohnachev S. A., Kislyakova Yu. G., Anisimova N. V. O novoj roli zaveduyushchego kafedroj v realizacii programmy strategicheskogo razvitiya vuza // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. — 2014. — № 5. — URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=15199

3. Ershova I. V. Nauchnye publikacii: imperativ tvorchestva // Metodologicheskie problemy civilisticheskih issledovanij. — 2019. — T. 1. — № 1. — S. 45—63.

4. Ershova I. V. Nauchnye shkoly: zakon, doktrina, praktika // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Кутафafina (MGYuA). — 2016. — № 11. — S. 6—19.

5. Zagidulin R. A. Pravovoj status zaveduyushchego kafedroj // Region i mir. — 2019. — № 7. — S. 51—57.

6. Zajceva L. V. Pravovoj status nauchnyh rabotnikov v Federativnoj Respublike Germaniya // Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. — 2019. — № 6. — S. 8—12.

7. Zaharova M. V., Voronin M. V. Yuridicheskaya nauka v vyzovah vneshnej sredy: ot nacional’nogo proshlogo k stolknoveniyu s paradigmami globalizacii // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2019. — Vyp. 43. — S. 19—45.

8. Zaharova M. V. Predstavitel’stvo interesov nauchno-pedagogicheskih rabotnikov vo Francii: pozitivnyj opyt dlya Rossii // Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. — 2015. — № 4. — S. 19—22.

9. Zvonarev D. G. Kompetentnost’ zaveduyushchego kafedroj vuza kak menedzhera na sovremennom etape modernizacii sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya // Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pedagogika. — 2015. — № 2. — S. 89—101.

10. Zinov’ev F. V., Dudko V. A. Zaveduyushchij kafedroj: taktik ili strateg // Issledovanie, sistematizaciya, kooperaciya, razvitie, analiz social’no-ekonomicheskih sistem v oblasti ekonomiki i upravleniya (Iskra —

11. 2019) : sb. trudov II Vserossijskoj shkoly-simpoziuma molodyh uchenyh / nauch. red. V. M. Yachmeneva. — Simferopol’, 2019. — S. 246—250.

12. Karmaeva N. N., Rodina N. V. Zaveduyushchie kafedrami v usloviyah menyayushchihsya mekhanizmov upravleniya v vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniyah Rossii // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. — 2016. — № 8. — S. 137—145.

13. Perederij V. A. Novye podhody k ocenke kachestv i kompetencij zaveduyushchego kafedroj sovremennogo vuza (rezul’taty empiricheskogo issledovaniya) // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. — 2018. — № 3. — S. 15—18.

14. Predprinimatel’skoe pravo: sovremennyj vzglyad : monografiya / otv. red. S. A. Karelina, P. G. Lahno, I. S. Shitkina — M. : Yusticinform, 2019. — 600 s.

15. Reznik S. D., Sazykina O. A. Zaveduyushchie kafedrami universitetov Rossii: stupeni rosta. — M. : Infra-M, 2020. — 193 s.

16. Reznik S. D., Sazykina O. A. Modelirovanie kompetencij zaveduyushchih kafedrami rossijskih vuzov // Russian Journal of Management. — 2015. — T. 3. — № 2. — S. 140—149.

17. Reznik S. D., Sazykina O. A. O stile rukovodstva i rabote s personalom zaveduyushchego universitetskoj kafedroj // Upravlenec. — 2017. — № 1. — S. 20—28.

18. Stepanenko Yu. V. Pravovoj status nauchnogo rabotnika: klyuchevye ponyatiya // Aktual’nye problemy administrativnogo prava i processa. — 2019. — № 5. — S. 26—32.

19. Deem R., Hillyard S. & Reed M. Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism. — Oxford Academ., 2008. — 256 p.

20. Henkel M. Shifting boundaries and the academic profession // Key challenges to the academic profession / M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.). Werkstattberichte. — 2007. — Vol. 65. — Pp. 191—204.

21. Jackson T. A., Meyer J. P., Xiao-Hua (Frank) Wang. Leadership, Commitment, and Culture: a Meta-Analysis // Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. — 2013. — Vol. 20. — №. 1. — Pp. 84—106.

22. Lundell D. & Collins T. G. Towards a Theory Developmental Education: the Centrality of Discourse // Theoretical Perspectives in Developmental Education / D. Lundell & J. L. Higbee (Eds.). — 2001. — Pp. 3—20.

23. Rodionov A. V. The Management Development Methodology for Quality of Higher Education // European Researcher. — 2012. — Vol. 36. — № 12—1. — Pp. 2150—2153.