Evolution of Domestic Procedural Science
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.128.7.011-022
Abstract
The paper analyzes a number of the most significant works of procedural law scholars, experts in legal process and procedural form, which made it possible to trace the evolution of the domestic procedural law science, including pre-revolutionary, Soviet and modern periods. Each of these periods is characterized in relation to the specific works of a number of authors. The domestic procedural science originates from the unity of three processes: civil, criminal and administrative, and the tendency to create a single procedural or judicial law. The main conclusion is that today the procedural science lags behind the substantive science, especially the general legal processology. Therefore, there is a need to develop a general legal theory of procedural legal regulation, which will facilitate not only further scientific development of the problem of legal regulation in general, but also will meet the practical needs.
About the Authors
V. P. Belyaev
South-West State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valeriy P. Belyaev, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor of the Department of Theory and History of the State and Law
ul. 50 let Oktyabrya, d. 94, Kursk
T. M. Nintsieva
Chechen Republic
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tamila M. Nintsieva, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Dean of the Law Faculty
ul. A. Sheripova, 32, Grozny
References
1. Agadzhanyan A. V. Mekhanizm processual’no-pravovogo regulirovaniya: obshcheteoreticheskoe issledovanie : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Groznyj, 2019.
2. Gorshenev V. M. Processual’naya forma i ee naznachenie v sovetskom prave // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1973. — № 12.
3. Krasnov N. I., Ikonickaya I. A. Processual’nye voprosy sovetskogo zemel’nogo prava. — M., 1975.
4. Luk’yanova E. G. Teoriya processual’nogo prava. — M., 2003.
5. Makogon B. V. Processual’no-ogranichitel’noe regulirovanie publichnyh pravootnoshenij : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — Belgorod, 2019.
6. Mal’cev G. V. Proiskhozhdenie i rannie formy prava i gosudarstva. — M., 1999.
7. Mihajlovskij I. V. Sudebnoe pravo kak samostoyatel’naya yuridicheskaya nauka // Pravo. — 1908. — № 32.
8. Osnovy sovetskogo prava / pod red. D. Magerovskogo. — M., 1927.
9. Pavlushina A. A. Teoriya yuridicheskogo processa: itogi, problemy, perspektivy razvitiya / pod red. V. M. Vedyahina. — Samara, 2005.
10. Panova I. V. Yuridicheskij process. — Saratov, 1998.
11. Polyanskij N. N. Ocherki obshchej teorii ugolovnogo processa. — M., 1927.
12. Problemy sudebnogo prava / A. A. Mel’nikov, N. N. Polyanskij, V. M. Savickij, M. S. Strogovich ; pod red. V. M. Savickogo. — M., 1983.
13. Protasov V. N. Osnovy obshchepravovoj processual’noj teorii. — M., 1991.
14. Protasov V. N. Teoriya yuridicheskoj procedury. — M., 2020.
15. Protasov V. N. Yuridicheskaya procedura. — M., 1991.
16. Protasov Yu. N. Obshchaya teoriya processual’nogo prava. — M., 2020.
17. Processual’nye normy i otnosheniya v sovetskom prave (v «neprocessual’nyh» otraslyah) / pod red. I. A. Galagana — Voronezh, 1985.
18. Rozin N. N. Process kak yuridicheskaya nauka (iz lekcij po sudebnomu pravu) // Zhurnal Ministerstva yusticii. — 1910.
19. Ryazanovskij V. A. Edinstvo processa. — M., 2003.
20. Sorokin V. D. Pravovoe regulirovanie : Predmet, metod, process (makrouroven’). — SPb., 2003.
21. Sorokin V. D. Problemy administrativnogo processa. — M., 1968.
22. Teoriya yuridicheskogo processa / pod red. V. G. Gorsheneva. — Har’kov, 1985.
23. Fojnickij I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. — 4-e izd. — SPb., 1912.
24. Chel’cov-Bebutov M. L. Sovetskij ugolovnyj process. — Har’kov, 1929.
25. Yuridicheskaya processual’naya forma: teoriya i praktika / pod obshch. red. P. E. Nedbajlo, V. M. Gorsheneva. — M., 1976.
Review
For citations:
Belyaev V.P., Nintsieva T.M. Evolution of Domestic Procedural Science. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(7):11-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.128.7.011-022
Views:
425
Email this article 