Theoretical and Practical Issues of Minor Suspect or Accused Supervision in the Russian Criminal Proceedings
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.121.12.131-139
Abstract
The paper examines the main theoretical and practical issues that arise when choosing such a special measure of restraint in relation to a minor suspect or accused as supervision. The authors emphasize that due to legislative gaps and the lack of a clear algorithm of actions for its application, this measure of restraint is rarely applied in practice. The paper touches upon the topic of the participation of adults in the supervision of a minor suspect or accused. In particular, the authors conclude that it is impossible for the guardian to participate in these criminal procedural relations. The study and analysis of scientific literature allowed the authors to develop criteria which may help determine whether it is possible to admit an adult person to supervise a minor suspect or accused. It is stated that in order to increase the number of supervision application in respect of minor suspects and accused in comparison with other preventive measures, it is necessary to legislatively revise the provisions of the criminal procedure law and recommendations given in the resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, including using the norms of foreign legislation.
About the Authors
S. V. MatveevRussian Federation
Sergey V. Matveev, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Procedure Law
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, Russia, 125993
P. V. Kulakov
Russian Federation
Pavel V. Kulakov, Assistant Judge
Yartsevskaya ul., d. 12, str. 1, Moscow, Russia, 121351
References
1. Brylyakov S. P., Pupysheva L. A. Osobennosti primeneniya mer presecheniya v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnih // Yuridicheskaya mysl’. — 2016. — № 1 (96). — S. 122–126.
2. Gliznuca S. I. Primenenie mer presecheniya v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnih : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.09. — Tyumen’, 2011.
3. Danilova S. I. Izbranie, otmena ili izmenenie mery presecheniya v vide prismotra za nesovershennoletnim podozrevaemym ili obvinyaemym // SPS «Konsul’tantPlyus»
4. Erofeeva V. A. Prismotr za nesovershennoletnim podozrevaemym, obvinyaemym v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.09. — M., 2018.
5. Kabancov Yu. I. Osobennosti izbraniya mery presecheniya pri sovershenii prestuplenij nesovershennoletnimi // Vestnik KRU MVD Rossii. — 2014. — № 1 (24). — S. 45–48.
6. Konovalova M. A. Nekotorye aktual’nye voprosy izbraniya i primeneniya mery presecheniya v vide prismotra za nesovershennoletnim podozrevaemym ili obvinyaemym // Social’no-politicheskie nauki. — 2018. — № 3. — S. 168–172.
7. Potekhina E. A. Prismotr za nesovershennoletnimi podozrevaemymi ili obvinyaemymi kak mera presecheniya i ee primenenie sledovatelyami organov vnutrennih del : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.09. — SPb., 2006.
8. Tkachyova N. V. Mery presecheniya, ne svyazannye s zaklyucheniem pod strazhu, v ugolovnom processe Rossii : monografiya. — Chelyabinsk : Izd-vo YuUrGU, 2004.
9. Shishkov A. A. Pochemu opekun ne prismatrivaet za nesovershennoletnim podozrevaemym i obvinyaemym // Voprosy yuvenal’noj yusticii. — 2013. — № 5. — S. 13–16.
Review
For citations:
Matveev S.V., Kulakov P.V. Theoretical and Practical Issues of Minor Suspect or Accused Supervision in the Russian Criminal Proceedings. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(12):131-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.121.12.131-139