Comparative Legal Analysis of Relations of Tax Liability for Tax, Financial and Administrative Offenses

The paper is devoted to the study of issues related to the determination of the legal nature of tax liability. The study is aimed at delineating and determining the essence of tax liability as an institution of administrative or financial (tax) law. Implementation of the task is related not only to the identification of unique properties of the phenomenon of liability in the field of taxation, but also to the study of the necessity of isolating this protective institution within the framework of tax or administrative relations. The authors come to the conclusion that administrative and tax liability (liability for violation of tax legislation) correlate between each other as the general and private and have a common administrative public nature, peculiar to such sectoral types of responsibility as tax, financial, administrative responsibility. The obtained results provide a promising opportunity to identify the legal links of the institution, to investigate the peculiarities of its sectoral application, to determine modern trends of transformation approaches developed by the science of financial and administrative law.

1. Agapov A. B. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost’. — M. : Statut. 2000.

2. Gracheva E. Yu., Kufakova N. A., Pepelyaev S. G. Finansovoe pravo Rossii : uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov i

3. prakt. rabotnikov finansovyh uchrezhdenij. — M. : Teis, 1995.

4. Gracheva E. Yu., Shchekin D. M. Kommentarij k dissertacionnym issledovaniyam po finansovomu pravu. —

5. M., 2017.

6. Ilovajskij S. I. Uchebnik finansovogo prava. — Odessa, 1904.

7. Il’inov O. A. Pravovye osnovy otvetstvennosti za sovershenie nalogovyh pravonarushenij v usloviyah reformy

8. nalogovogo administrirovaniya : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2007.

9. Karaseva M. V. Finansovoe pravo. Obshchaya chast’. — M. : Yurist", 2004.

10. Karaseva M. V. Finansovoe pravo. Obshchaya chast’ : uchebnik. — M. : Yurist", 2000.

11. Kuzmicheva G. A., Kalinina L. A. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost’. — M. : Yurisprudenciya, 2000.

12. Lejst O. E. Sankcii i otvetstvennost’ po sovetskomu pravu. — M. : Izd-vo MGU, 1981.

13. Lipinskij D. A. Problemy yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti. — SPb., 2003.

14. Serdcev A. N. Otvetstvennost’ za narushenie nalogovogo zakonodatel’stva (sovremennoe sostoyanie

15. problemy) : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2003.

16. Serkov P. P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost’ v rossijskom prave: sovremennoe osmyslenie i novye

17. podhody. — M. : Norma, Infra-M, 2012.

18. Tihomirov Yu. A. Administrativnoe pravo i process : polnyj kurs. — 2-e izd. — M. : Yusticinform, 2005.

19. Hamenushko I. V. O pravovoj prirode finansovyh sankcij // Yuridicheskij mir. — 1997. — № 1. — S. 46–50.

20. Hachaturov R. L., Yagutyan R. G. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’. — Tol’yatti : Akcent, 1995.

21. Hohlov V. A. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost’ za narushenie dogovora. — Tol’yatti : Izd-vo TolPI, 1997.