Subsidiarity Principle: In Search of a Balance between Centralization and Decentralization (State Legal Aspect)
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.120.11.160-171
Abstract
About the Author
I. V. IrkhinRussian Federation
Igor V. Irkhin, Dr. Sci. (Law).
ul. Kalinina, d. 13, Krasnodar, Russia, 350044
References
1. Alebastrova I. A. Konstitucionnye principy: problemy yuridicheskoj prirody i effektivnosti realizacii // Konstitucionnoe i municipal’noe pravo. — 2007. — № 7. — S. 5–13.
2. Dzhagaryan A. A., Dzhagaryan N. V. Funkcional’no-pravovye orientiry mestnogo samoupravleniya: teoreticheskij aspekt // Sravnitel’noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie. — 2017. — № 5. — S. 94–115.
3. Lyubashic V. Ya. Issledovanie gosudarstvennoj (politicheskoj) vlasti: opyt ispol’zovaniya sistemno-strukturnogo metoda // Severo-Kavkazskij yuridicheskij vestnik. — 2014. — № 1. — S. 7–8.
4. Ovsepyan Zh. I. K obsuzhdeniyu koncepcii statusa konstitucionnogo pravosudiya v sfere zashchity fundamental’nyh prav i svobod na osnove principov i norm mezhdunarodnogo prava v period globalizacii // Zhurnal konstitucionnogo pravosudiya. — 2011. — № 1. — S. 1–11.
5. Pimenova O. I. Subsidiarnost’ kak princip realizacii sovmestnyh zakonodatel’nyh polnomochij: opyt Evropejskogo Soyuza i perspektivy ego adaptacii v rossijskoj sisteme razgranicheniya polnomochij po predmetam sovmestnogo védeniya. — M. : Novoe vremya, 2015.
6. Polyanskij V. V. Metody i principy garmonizacii publichnoj vlasti // Lex russica. — 2015. — № 10. — S. 32–45.
7. Polyanskij V. V., Volkov V. E. Garmonizaciya publichnoj vlasti — cel’ reformy mestnogo samoupravleniya // Lex russica. — 2014. — № 7. — S. 772–782.
8. Umnova I. A. Problemy defederalizacii i perspektivy optimizacii sovremennoj rossijskoj modeli razgranicheniya predmetov védeniya i polnomochij v kontekste doktriny subsidiarnosti // Sravnitel’noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie. — 2012. — № 1 (87). — S. 45–55.
9. Cherepanov V. A. O sistemnoj modeli federativnogo gosudarstva // Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie. — 2006. — № 8. — S. 3–7.
10. Bardhan P. Decentralization of Governance and Development // Journal of Economic Perspectives. — 2002. — Vol. 16.
11. Bilancia P. The Normative autonomy of local government in Italy // Place and Role of Local Government in Federal Systems / N. Steytler (Hg). — Johannesburg : Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, 2005. — 226 p.
12. Blank Y. Federalism, Subsidiarity, and the Role of Local Governments in an Age of Global Multilevel Governance // Fordham Urban Journal. — 2009. — Vol. 37.
13. Bóka É. The idea of Subsidiarity in the European Federalist Thought (A historical survey) // URL: www.grotius. hu/doc/pub/ECICWF/boka_eva_idea_subisidiarity.pdf.
14. Brennan P. Subsidiarity in the Tradition of Catholic Social Doctrine // Villanova University Widger School of Law. Working Paper Series. — 2012. — 20 p. — URL: www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2182190.
15. Burbidge D. The Inherently Political Nature of Subsidiarity // The American Journal of Jurisprudence. — 2017. — Vol. 62. — № 2.
16. Cărăuşan M. European public administration under the principles of legality, proportionality and subsidiarity // EIRP International Conference. — 2010. — URL: www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=1987113.
17. Casambre A. Autonomous Region: The Cordillera Autonomous Region // Philippines politics and governance: Challenges to democratization and development / T. Tadem, N. Moranda (Eds.). — Diliman : University of the Philippines Press. — URL: www.halalan.up.edu.ph/mediabox/pdf/polisci_readings/17_Autonomous_ Regions_The_Cordillera_Autonomous_Region.pdf.
18. Cohen J., Peterson S. Administrative Decentralization: Strategies for Developing Countries. — Boulder (CO, USA) : Kumarian Press, 1999. — 207 p.
19. Decentralization: A Sampling of Definitions (Working Paper in connection with the Joint UNDP-Government of Germany evaluation of the UNDP role in decentralization and local governance). 1999.
20. European Commission. Tools and Methods Series (Reference Document № 23). Supporting Decentralization, Local Governance and Local Development through a Territorial Approach. 2016.
21. Iwuagwu E. The Socio-Ethical Principle of Subsidiarity: A Philosophical Appraisal of Its Relevance in the Contemporary World // Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. — 2016. — Vol. 6. — № 12.
22. Jubenkanda R. Centralization and Decentralization // Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science. — 2016. — Vol. 4.
23. Krishnaswamy S. Democracy and Constitutionalism in India: A Study of the Basic Structure Doctrine. — Oxford University Press, 2009. — 244 p.
24. Leyland P. The multifaceted constitution dynamics of U. K. devolution // ICON. — 2011. — Vol. 9.
25. Vischer R. Subsidiarity as a Principle of Governance: Beyond Devolution // Indian Law Abstract. — 2001. — Vol. 35.
26. Zaharia P., Bilouseac I. Decentralization and Local Autonomy — Local Public Management Defining Principles // Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica. — 2009. — Vol. 11.
27. Zimmermann A. Subsidiarity and a Free Society // Policy. — 2014–2015. — Vol. 30. — № 4.
Review
For citations:
Irkhin I.V. Subsidiarity Principle: In Search of a Balance between Centralization and Decentralization (State Legal Aspect). Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(11):160-171. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.120.11.160-171