Access to Court as a Determinative Procedural Act for the Exercise of Justice and Protection of Rights in Civil Cases (Part 2)
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.122.1.099-110
Abstract
The author, following the focus of the study on specialization of civil procedural law in the Russian legal system as manifested regularity of its development, relying on the inevitable dualism and interaction between material and procedural law, comprehends its current state on the example of certain basic procedural and legal institutions: the institution of the right of access to court, the institution of protection of the rights and interests of other persons, the institution of jurisdiction, etc The author’s use of known and proposed legal constructions, categories and concepts in the author’s combination and (or) interpretation makes their research urgent for the purposes of understanding of the key conditionality of civil procedural law specialization in the Russian law system as providing them with the administration of justice and protection of rights in civil cases in compliance with their wide understanding when the right to judicial protection in the system of constitutional rights and freedoms constitutes a guarantee for all of them. This paper is the second in a series of three papers devoted to the problem of the right of access to court as the most important issue of dualism and interaction between material and civil procedural rights.
Keywords
right to judicial protection,
right of access to court,
civil procedural law,
specialization of law,
civil cases,
civil court jurisdiction,
legal concern (interest),
judicial protection,
justice,
procedural law,
court proceedings,
principle of dispositivity,
dualism and interaction of material and procedural law,
legal relationship
About the Author
E. E. Uksusova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Elena E. Uksusova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Member of the Council for the Improvement of Arbitration under the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; Member of the Presidium of the Russian Arbitration Center under the Russian Institute of Modern Arbitration; Professor, Department of Civil and Administrative Court Proceedings
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Алексеев С.С. Структура советского права// Собрание сочинений. В 10т. [+ Справоч.том]. Том 2: Специальные вопросы правоведения. М.: Статут. 2010.
2. Афанасьев С.Ф. О соотношении конституционного права на судебную защиту и юридического интереса в цивилистическом процессе// Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. 2004. N 12
3. Боннер А.Т. Соотношение властности и диспозитивности в развитии гражданских процессуальных правовотношений//Избранные труды по гражданскому процессу. СПб: Издательский Дом С.-Петерб. Гос. Ун-та, Издательство юридического факультета С.-Петерб. Гос. Ун-та. 2005.
4. Воронов А.Ф. Эволюция функциональных принципов гражданского процесса: автореф. докт. юрид. наук. М.: 2009.
5. Гукасян Р.Е. Проблема интереса в советском гражданском процессуальном праве. Саратов. 1970.
6. Гурвич М.А. Право на иск. Изд-во Академии наук СССР. 1949.
7. Осипов Ю.К. Подведомственность юридических дел: автореф. дис. ..док. юрид.наук. Свердловск. 1974.
8. Терехова Л.А. Новые и вновь открывшиеся обстоятельства в гражданском и административном судопроизводстве: монография. М.: Проспект. 2017.
9. Чечина Н.А. Норма права и судебное решение//Чечина Н.А. Избранные труды по гражданскому процессу. СПб.: Издательский Дом с.-Петерб. Гос. Ун-та. 2004.
10. Шакарян М.С. Субъекты советского гражданского процессуального правоотношения: автореф. дис. …док. юрид. наук. М..1972.
Review
For citations:
Uksusova E.E. Access to Court as a Determinative Procedural Act for the Exercise of Justice and Protection of Rights in Civil Cases (Part 2). Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(1):99-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.122.1.099-110
Views:
569
Email this article 