Relations Regulated by the Norms Contained in the Civil Procedural Codes and the Subject of Civil Procedural Law
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.135.2.118-127
Abstract
The paper analyses legal relations that develop in writ proceedings and conciliation procedures and substantiates the idea that they are not included in the subject of civil procedural law. The author shows their qualitative difference from the industry forming relations arising in the administration of justice and the impossibility of combining them in the subject of the industry. The effectiveness of changes in civil procedural legislation aimed at reducing the judicial burden is assessed. It is pointed out that it is inadmissible to refuse procedural guarantees of justice. The author agrees with the position existing in the scientific literature on the exclusion of writ proceedings from the jurisdiction of the courts in order to optimize the workload on judges. Attention is given to the need to improve the procedure for issuing court orders, some measures are proposed for this. Due to the lack of connection between the relations that develop in conciliation procedures and the subject of the industry, the inclusion of the norms regulating them in the texts of civil procedural codes is criticized.
About the Author
S. S. Kazikhanova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana S. Kazikhanova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Administrative Court Proceedings
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Alekseev S. S. Sobranie sochinenij : v 10 t. T. 2 : Special’nye voprosy pravovedeniya. — M. : Statut, 2010. — 471 s.
2. Borisova E. A. Snizhenie sudebnoj nagruzki stavitsya vo glavu preobrazovanij processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva // Garant.ru. — 23 oktyabrya 2017 g. — URL: https://www.garant.ru/interview/1144157/ (data obrashcheniya: 10.04.2021).
3. Vas’kovskij E. V. Kurs grazhdanskogo processa : Sub»ekty i ob»ekty processa, processual’nye otnosheniya i dejstviya. — M. : Statut, 2016. — 624 s.
4. Grazhdanskoe processual’noe pravo Rossii : uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. S. F. Afanas’eva. — M. : Yurajt, 2013. — 879 s.
5. Grazhdanskoe processual’noe pravo : uchebnik / pod red. M. S. Shakaryan. — M. : Prospekt, 2004. — 584 s.
6. Gromoshina N. A. Differenciaciya i unifikaciya v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve : dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2010. — 409 s
7. Gromoshina N. A. Ocherednoj shag v uproshchenii civilisticheskogo processa: ocenki i perspektivy // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2019. — № 10. — S. 17–21.
8. Gurvich M. A. Grazhdanskie processual’nye pravootnosheniya i processual’nye dejstviya // Trudy VYuZI. — M., 1965. — T. 3. — S. 62–117.
9. Zagajnova S. K., Kuzbagarov A. N. Ob ispol’zovanii primiritel’nyh procedur pri osushchestvlenii pravosudiya po sporam chastnopravovogo haraktera // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process. — 2006. — № 2. — S. 25–28.
10. Zdrok O. N. Primiritel’nye procedury v civilisticheskom processe : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — Minsk, 2019. — 52 s.
11. Tumanov D. A. Probely v grazhdanskom processual’nom prave. — M. : Norma, 2008. — 208 s.
12. Tumanov D. A., Alekhina S. A. O nekotoryh tendenciyah razvitiya grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2015. — № 3. — S. 12–27.
13. Tumanov D. A. Eshche raz o tom, yavlyaetsya li sudebnyj prikaz aktom pravosudiya, ili Razmyshleniya o sushchnosti pravosudiya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2016. — № 9. — S. 13–19.
14. Tumanov D. A. Nekotorye razmyshleniya o pravosudii i optimizacii sudoproizvodstva // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2020. — № 8. — S. 3–17.
15. Kazihanova S. S. K voprosu o vozmozhnosti vzyskaniya sudebnyh raskhodov samostoyatel’nym iskom o vozmeshchenii ubytkov // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2017. — № 9. — S. 15–20.
16. Kozlova N., Valagin A., Panasenko S. Bez menya menya sudili // RG. — 2019. — № 267.
17. Prosvirin A. G. Sud ispol’zovan v moshennicheskoj «skheme». Kto otvetit za ushcherb? // Blog v social’noj seti dlya yuristov Zakon.ru. — URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2019/7/25/sud_ispolzovan_v_moshennicheskoj_ sheme_kto_otvetit_za_uscherb.
18. Treshcheva E. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie primiritel’nyh procedur na sovremennom etape // Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2012. — № 3/1 (94). — S. 88–92.
19. Fokina M. A. K voprosu o sovremennoj modeli grazhdanskih processual’nyh pravootnoshenij // Problemy grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva v trudah i deyatel’nosti M. S. Shakaryan : sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj pamyati i 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya doktora yuridicheskih nauk, professora Marii Sumbatovny Shakaryan / otv. red. S. M. Mihajlov. — M. : Prospekt, 2014. — S. 49–55.
20. Civilisticheskij process sovremennoj Rossii: problemy i perspektivy : monografiya / pod red. N. A. Gromoshinoj. — M. : Prospekt, 2017. — 208 s.
21. Chechina N. A. Grazhdanskie processual’nye otnosheniya. — L. : Izd-vo Leningr. un-ta, 1962. — 68 s.
Review
For citations:
Kazikhanova S.S. Relations Regulated by the Norms Contained in the Civil Procedural Codes and the Subject of Civil Procedural Law. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2022;17(2):118-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.135.2.118-127
Views:
1250
Email this article 