On Judicial Administration in the Russian Federation: Foreign Experience Case Study

Each country chooses the optimal system for organizing the provision of judicial activities, based on historical and current legal understanding. The paper analyzes examples of different forms of distribution of responsibilities between the judiciary and the executive in terms of judicial administration, reveals the scope of powers of state bodies on the example of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Croatia, Great Britain, the USA, etc. The historical experience of Russia in organizing the provision of judicial activities is analyzed, a key problem in financing the budget of the judiciary is highlighted. The author noted a tendency towards a redistribution of powers towards the judiciary and directly the judicial branch of government. The key advantages of the implemented trend are indicated. The bodies of the judiciary, together with the Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, are taking the right steps to gradually improve the judicial system, at present we cannot stop there, we must strive to increase the effectiveness of communicating the position of the judiciary when resolving issues of budget allocation and identifying priority projects of the judicial system development program for the next decade.

1. Baturov G. P. Organizaciya sudebnoj deyatel’nosti. - M. : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1977. - 173 s.

2. Bibilo V. N. Sudebnye sistemy zarubezhnyh gosudarstv : uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. - Minsk, 2012. - 93 s.

3. Golunskij S. A. Osnovy sudoustrojstva Soyuza SSR i soyuznyh respublik: postanovlenie CIK SSSR ot 29.10.1924 (SZ. 1924. № 23. St. 203) // Istoriya zakonodatel’stva SSSR i RSFSR po ugolovnomu processu i organizacii suda i prokuratury 1917-1954 gg. : sbornik dokumentov / sost. doc. L. N. Gusev ; pod red. chl.-kor. Akad. nauk SSSR S. A. Golunskogo. - M., 1955.

4. Lenin V. I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij. - 3-e izd. - T. 19. - L. : Partizdat CK VKP(b), 1935.

5. Nekroshyus V. Reforma sudebnoj vlasti v Litovskoj Respublike: osnovnye rezul’taty i perspektivy // Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v notarial’noj i sudebnoj sfere. - SPb., 2006. - S. 141-149.

6. Petruhin I. L. Sudebnaya vlast’. - M. : TK Velbi, 2003. - 720 s.

7. Pravovye itogi - 2018 / P. V. Krasheninnikov, Yu. G. Tolstoj [i dr.] // Zakon. - 2019. - № 1. - S. 18-37.

8. Savinov K. A. Institut gosudarstvennoj poshliny pri obrashchenii v sud: aktual’nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya // Rossijskaya yusticiya. - 2020. - № 1. - S. 66-70.

9. Sudebnye sistemy zarubezhnyh stran : uchebnoe posobie dlya magistratury / A. T. Gol’cov, A. L. Osipov [i dr.]. - M. : Norma, Infra-M, 2019. - 160 s.

10. Temushkin O. P. Organizacionno-pravovye formy proverki zakonnosti i obosnovannosti prigovorov. - M. : Nauka, 1978. - 240 s.

11. Fojnickij I. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. - T. 1. - SPb. : Al’fa, 1996. - 607 s.

12. Yakovlev V. F. Izbrannye trudy. T. 3 : Arbitrazhnye sudy: stanovlenie i razvitie. - M. : Statut, 2013. - 749 s.