Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Implementation of the Principle of Non Bis In Idem When Bringing to Public Liability

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.136.3.011-018

Abstract

The paper describes the essence of the principle of administrative responsibility that can be imposed only one time. It defines the concept and gives recommendations for improving the current legislation. The paper examines the correlation between administrative and criminal responsibility, administrative and other publiclegal responsibility that is neither formally nor legally related to administrative responsibility. Based on numerous judicial cases, the author specifies the criteria for distinguishing administrative offenses, crimes and other public offenses, the application of which should be carried out by subjects of administrative jurisdiction independently in the course of proceeding. According to the results of the conducted research, the author defines one of the rules of the principle of non bis in idem, namely: parallel or sequential bringing to administrative and other publiclegal responsibility for the commission of identical acts is unacceptable if the compositions of the corresponding offenses by their nature and severity of punishment are of similar nature.

About the Author

A. R. Nobel
Volga-Vyatka Institute (Branch), Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Artem R. Nobel, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of the State and Legal Disciplines

ul. Moskovskaya, d. 30, Kirov, Russia, 610000



References

1. Babichev N. T., Borovskij Ya. M. Slovar’ latinskih krylatyh slov: 2 500 edinic / pod red. Ya. M. Borovskogo. — 3-e izd., ster. — M. : Russkij yazyk, 1988. — 960 s.

2. Dikarev I. S. Realizaciya obshchepriznannogo principa non bis in idem v rossijskom ugolovnom processe // Vestnik Volgograd. gos. un-ta. Seriya 5, Yurisprudenciya. — 2013. — № 1 (18). — S. 100–104.

3. Rabcevich O. I. Princip odnokratnosti privlecheniya k otvetstvennosti za odno pravonarushenie (Ne bis in idem): mezhdunarodnye i vnutrigosudarstvennye aspekty // Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yusticiya. — 2010. — № 4. — S. 17–23.

4. Shcherba S. P., Smirnov P. A., Chetvertakova E. Yu. Princip non bis in idem v sfere mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva po ugolovnym delam // Vestnik Akademii General’noj prokuratury RF. — 2017. — № 1 (57). — S. 142–148.

5. Nevera A., Melnicenko S. The non bis in idem principle in the European Union criminal law // Social Sciences Studies 2009. 4(4). — P. 85–106. — URL: https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/societal-studies/article/view/1382/1323 (data obrashcheniya: 01.06.2021).


Review

For citations:


Nobel A.R. Implementation of the Principle of Non Bis In Idem When Bringing to Public Liability. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2022;17(3):11-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.136.3.011-018

Views: 539


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)