Possibility of Applying the Means of Ensuring International Security to the Information Space
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.139.6.168-176
Abstract
In order to resolve the issue of acceptability of the states’ appeal to existing mechanisms for ensuring safe and systematic development of international relations in the ICT environment, the author determines the main approaches appearing in joint communiqués and agreements issued following the results of conferences and high-level meetings of representatives of the Russian Federation and its partners and the allied bloc of the USA, the countries of the European Union and other states. By interpreting such terms as “information weapons”, “cyber weapons”, “cyber espionage”, the difficulties associated with the process of creating a secure ICT environment are identified. The result of the study is the identification of security tools that are relevant and optimal from the point of view of the current state of international security law in relation to the ICT environment and that can be recommended to be used by states in order to form a secure mode of interaction in the framework of the exercise by states of their functions in the foreign policy arena amid the global information space.
About the Author
Yu. A. YudinaMGIMO MFA of Russia
Russian Federation
Yuliya A. Yudina - Expert of the Center for International Information Security and Science and Technology Policy, MGIMO MFA of Russia.
Vernadskogo pr., d. 76, Moscow, 119454.
References
1. Batyr V. A. Novye vyzovy XXI veka v sfere razvitiya sredstv vooruzhennoj borby // Evrazijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. — 2014. — № 1 (69). — S. 76–81.
2. Bogdanov A. N. «Amerikanskaya odnopolyarnost» i sistemnyj balans sil v nachale XXI v. // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. — 2015. — № 2. — S. 96–97.
3. Danelyan A. A. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe regulirovanie kiberprostranstva // Obrazovanie i pravo. — 2020. — № 1.
4. Ilinskaya O. I. K voprosu o sposobah obespecheniya vypolneniya mezhdunarodnyh dogovorov // Aktualnye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2011. — № 3. — S. 238–243.
5. Kabernik V. V. Problemy klassifikacii kiberoruzhiya // Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. — 2013. — № 1 (29). — S. 72–78.
6. Korotkov A. V., Zinoveva E. S. Bezopasnost kriticheskih informacionnyh infrastruktur v mezhdunarodnom gumanitarnom prave // Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. — 2011. — № 4. — S. 154–162.
7. Krutskih A. V. K politiko-pravovym osnovaniyam globalnoj informacionnoj bezopasnosti // Mezhdunarodnye processy. — 2007. — T. 5. — № 1 (13). — S. 28–37.
8. Lukashuk I. I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast. — 2-e izd. — M., 2004.
9. Lukin A. L. Littl R. Balans sil v mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniyah: metafory, mify i modeli (referat) // Politicheskaya nauka. — 2011. — № 2. — S. 258–265.
10. Romashkina N. P. Vooruzheniya bez kontrolya: sovremennye ugrozy mezhdunarodnoj informacionnoj bezopasnosti // Puti k miru i bezopasnosti. — 2018. — № 1 (55). — S. 64–83.
11. Harris Sh. Kibervojna: pyatyj teatr voennyh dejstvij. — M. : Alpina non-fikshn, 2016.
12. Baseley-Walker B. Transparency and confidence-building measures in cyberspace: towards norms of behavior // UNIDIR. Disarmament Forum, «Confronting cyberconflict». — 2011. — Iss. 4. — P. 31–40. — URL: http://www.unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/confronting-cyberconflict-en-317.pdf.
13. Hague W. Security and freedom in the cyber age — seeking the rules of the road: Speech to the Munich Security Conference, 4 February 2011 // URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/security-and-freedom-in-the-cyber-age-seeking-the-rules-of-the-road.
14. ICRC Expert Meeting: The Potential Human Cost of Cyber Operations / eds L. Gisel and L. Olejnik. — ICRC, Geneva, 2019. — URL: www.icrc.or//ownloa/il/600/he-potential-human-cost-of-cyber-operations.pdf.
15. Lee B. Bagheri, Kao H. A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems // Manufacturing Letters. — 2015. — Vol. 3. — P. 18–23.
16. Mele S. Cyber-Weapons: Legal and Strategic Aspects (Version 2.0) (June 7, 2013) // URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2518212.
17. Rid T., McBurney P. Cyber-Weapons // The RUSI Journal. — 2012. — Vol. 157. — Iss. 1. — P. 6–13. — DOI:10.1080/03071847.2012.664354.
18. Russia — US Bilateral on Cybersecurity. Critical Terminology foundations. EastWest Institute Worldwise Cybersecurity Initiative, Moscow state university information security institute. November 2013 // URL: http://wiki.informationsecurity.club/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=documents_all:russia-u_s_bilateral_on_terminology_rus.pdf.
Review
For citations:
Yudina Yu.A. Possibility of Applying the Means of Ensuring International Security to the Information Space. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2022;17(6):168-176. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.139.6.168-176