The Problem of the Right to Trial: The Theory and Practice of Dualism and Interaction between Substantive and Procedural Law
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.133.12.079-097
Abstract
Continuing the study of specialization of Russian civil procedural law, the author, based on the invariable perspective of its action, namely: a standardized court procedure of civil proceedings in administration of justice in a certain civil case and protection of the right, dwells on certain issues of its structural and functional characteristics — classification of procedural norms, mechanism of procedural regulation, mechanism of procedural legal relationship, etc. Through the context of the principle of dispositiveness, when clarifying the scope of its action and content as the legal beginning of legal proceedings (its leading element is the right to trial leading to the interaction of substantive and procedural law in the course of judicial protection of the right), the author analyzes and reveals the content, substantiates connections and relations between various interdisciplinary phenomena of law (a claim, the right to claim, etc.). The latest jurisprudence illustrates the importance of the conceptual legal apparatus for the development of legal science, law and improvement of its implementation in the Russian legal order.
Keywords
civil justice,
legitimate interest,
civil procedural law,
principle of discretion,
specialization of procedural
law,
procedural legal relationship,
legal proceedings,
mechanism of procedural and legal regulation,
dualism of
substantive and procedural law,
right to trial,
claim,
right to appeal against a judicial act,
insolvency (bankruptcy)
About the Author
E. E. Uksusova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Elena E. Uksusova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Professor, Department of Civil and Administrative Procedure, Member of the Presidium of the Russian Arbitration Center at ANO "Russian Institute of Modern Arbitration"
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Bonner A. T. Princip dispozitivnosti sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava. — M., 1987.
2. Vasil’ev A. M. Pravovye kategorii. Metodologicheskie aspekty razrabotki sistemy kategorii teorii prava. — M. : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1976.
3. Voronov A. F. Grazhdanskij process: evolyuciya dispozitivnosti. — M. : Statut, 2007.
4. Gurvich M. A. Sudebnoe reshenie. Teoreticheskie problemy. — M. : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1976.
5. Krasavchikov O. A. Izbrannye trudy : v 2 t. T. 1. — 2-e izd., ster. — M. : Statut, 2017.
6. Kurochkin S. A. Chastnye i publichnye nachala v civilisticheskom processe / nauch. red. V. V. Yarkov. — M. : Infotropik Media, 2012.
7. Malein N. S. Pravonarushenie: ponyatie, prichiny, otvetstvennost’. — M. : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1985.
8. Mel’nikov A. A. Sovetskij grazhdanskij processual’nyj zakon. Voprosy teorii grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava. — M. : Nauka, 1973.
9. Pokrovskij I. A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. — M. : Statut, 1998.
10. Sherstyuk V. M. Teoreticheskie problemy razvitiya grazhdanskogo processual’nogo, arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo prava i ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva v Rossijskoj Federacii. — M. : Gorodec, 2021.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Uksusova E.E. The Problem of the Right to Trial: The Theory and Practice of Dualism and Interaction between Substantive and Procedural Law. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(12):79-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.133.12.079-097
Views:
449
Email this article 