Responsibility for Infringement of Exclusive Rights to Cumulatively Protected Results of Intellectual Activity

The paper analyzes the problems of multiplication of responsibility for infringing exclusive rights to the results of intellectual activity protected under several legal regimes. Special attention is paid to the issues of collecting compensation for the violation of exclusive rights to design solutions that can be treated as copyrighted works, industrial designs, trademarks. The author examines the stances developed by the domestic doctrine and law enforcement practice, as well as foreign approaches to solving the problem of multiplication of responsibility for violation of rights to cumulatively protected results of creative work. It is noted that in Russian practice, the prevailing approach is that the exclusive right to each ideal object is subject to independent protection. It is concluded that it is necessary to introduce the rule concerning priority of the exclusive right over an industrial design in the context of protection of rights to designs

1. Vasileva E. N. Kompensatsiya za narushenie isklyuchitelnogo prava na intellektualnuyu sobstvennost // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. — 2015. — № 6. — S. 101–124.

2. Vorozhevich A. S. Peresechenie prav na tovarnye znaki, proizvedeniya i promyshlennye obraztsy // Zhurnal Suda po intellektualnym pravam. — 2017. — № 18. — S. 45–57.

3. Gavrilov E. P. Kompensatsiya za narushenie isklyuchitelnykh prav i nekotorye novye aspekty ee primeneniya // Khozyaystvo i pravo. — 2013. — № 7. — S. 3–21.

4. Gavrilov E. P. Pravovaya okhrana vneshnego vida promyshlennykh izdeliy (promyshlennykh obraztsov) v SSSR i zarubezhnykh stranakh: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 1967. — 27 s.

5. Dzhermakyan V. Yu. Kommentariy k glave 72 «Patentnoe pravo» Grazhdanskogo kodeksa RF. — 3‑e izd., pererab. i dop. — M., 2013.

6. Eliseev V. I. Problemy kumulyativnoy okhrany rezultatov intellektualnoy deyatelnosti // Zakonodatelstvo. — 2017. — № 2. — S. 22–28.

7. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: v 2 t. T. 2: Chasti III, IV GK RF / pod red. T. E. Abovoy, M. M. Boguslavskogo, A. G. Svetlanova. — 6‑e izd. — M., 2011.

8. Novoselova L. A. Printsip spravedlivosti i mekhanizm kompensatsii kak sredstvo zashchity isklyuchitelnykh prav // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. — 2017. — № 2.

9. Derclaye E., Leistner M. Intellectual Property Overlaps: A European Perspective. — Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010. — 406 p.

10. The Copyright/Design Interface: Past, Present and Future / ed. by E. Derclaye. — Cambridge University Press, 2018. — 474 p