Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Peculiarities of a Civil Legal Personality of a Public Law Company

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.146.1.086-098

Abstract

The paper analyzes the civil legal personality of a public law company. According to the results of the study, the author concludes that the private interest of a public law company as a participant in civil legal relations, as well as the ways of its implementation (the range and content of legal relations that are formed for their implementation) are formed under the influence of the public interest of the Russian Federation. In view of this, civil legal capacity of a public law company is predetermined by its legally established public powers and activities and has a «competence» character. The scope of the civil legal capacity of a public law company is subject to change when its public powers change, which indicates the labile nature of its civil legal capacity. When exercising civil legal capacity, subjective rights arising from a public law company have a reactive effect for third parties beyond the civil legal relationship. The paper describes limitations of the principle of freedom and autonomy of its will in relation to a public law company.

About the Author

Yu. A. Zaitseva
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Yulia A. Zaitseva, Postgraduate Student, Department of Civil Law

ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993 



References

1. Alekseev N. N. Obyazannost i pravo // Alekseev N. N. Russkiy narod i gosudarstvo. — M., 1998. — 635 s.

2. Basin Yu. G. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. — SPb., 2003. — 589 s.

3. Vavilin E. V. Ponyatie i mekhanizm osushchestvleniya grazhdanskikh prav i ispolneniya obyazannostey // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2004. — № 5. — S. 35–43.

4. Genkin D. M. Sochetanie prav s obyazannostyami v sovetskom prave // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1964. — № 7. — S. 27–38.

5. Grachev T. S. Prava i obyazannosti: modeli edinstva // Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2009. — № 5. — S. 31–33.

6. Elistratov A. I. Ponyatie o publichnom subektivnom prave. Teoriya subektivnykh publichnykh prav A. A. Rozhdestvenskogo. — M., 1913. — 39 s.

7. Zaytseva Yu. A. Upravlenie publichno-pravovykh kompaniy: struktura organov, ikh formirovanie i deyatelnost // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. — 2019. — № 5 (173). — S. 45–48.

8. Pokrovskiy I. A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava // URL: https://civil.consultant.ru/elib/books/23/info/.

9. Sovetskoe administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. S. S. Alekseeva. — M., 1985. — Vyp. 1. — 542 s.

10. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess: Polnyy kurs. — M., 2001. — 696 s.

11. Cherdantsev A. F. Ponyatie tekhniko-yuridicheskikh norm i ikh rol v formirovanii obshchestvennykh otnosheniy // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1964. — № 7.

12. Yampolskaya Ts. A. Subekty sovetskogo administrativnogo prava: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 1957. — 682 s.13. Jhering R. von. Geist des romischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung. — Teil 3, Bd. 1.


Review

For citations:


Zaitseva Yu.A. Peculiarities of a Civil Legal Personality of a Public Law Company. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2023;18(1):86-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.146.1.086-098

Views: 787


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)