Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Juridical Activities

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.145.12.025-038

Abstract

The paper discusses the use of artificial intelligence technology in legal activities. The author examines the problem of differentiating between weak and strong artificial intelligence. Attention is focused on the possibility of creating a superintelligence in the future, which already creates the need for scientists to pay close attention to the issues of introducing a system of ethical values into artificial intelligence. The paper highlights the problems of creating datasets necessary for training neural networks intended for the use in legal practice, as well as their quality. The author analyzes specific examples of the use of artificial intelligence systems in domestic and foreign legal practice. The author also justifies the possibility of considering the use of artificial intelligence as a separate type of legal technology. It is concluded that despite the large number of developments successfully used in legal practice based on artificial intelligence systems, they are all examples of weak artificial intelligence and act only as a means of increasing the efficiency of a lawyer, but do not replace it. The future of legal activities will be associated with an effective combination of artificial intelligence functionality and creative expert professional skills of a lawyer.

About the Author

E. A. Berezina
Yakovlev Ural State Law University
Russian Federation

Elena A. Berezina, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Theory of the State and Law

ul. Komsomolskaya, 21, Yekaterinburg, 620137



References

1. Alekseev A. Yu. Filosofiya iskusstvennogo intellekta: kontseptualnyy status kompleksnogo testa Tyuringa: dis. … d-ra filos. nauk. — M., 2015. — 482 s.

2. Bostrom N. Iskusstvennyy intellekt. Etapy. Ugrozy. Strategii / per. s angl. S. Filina. — M.: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2016. — 496 s.

3. Kornev A. V. Digitalizatsiya prava: problemy i perspektivy // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2019. — № 6. — S. 11–18.

4. Malysheva D. S., Kasimov A. V. Tekhnicheskie i filosofskie osnovaniya dlya sozdaniya silnogo iskusstvennogo intellekta (ch. I) // Vestnik Permskogo natsionalnogo issledovatelskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Kultura. Istoriya. Filosofiya. Pravo. — 2016. — № 3. — S. 75–85.

5. Serl Dzh. Soznanie, mozg i programmy / per. A. L. Blinova // URL: https://gtmarket.ru/library/articles/6661 (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2022).

6. Chernykh I. I. Pravovoe prognozirovanie v sfere grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva v usloviyakh razvitiya informatsionnykh tekhnologiy // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2019. — № 6 (103). — S. 58–72.

7. Yatsutsenko V. V. Problemy i perspektivy vnedreniya tsifrovykh tekhnologiy v deyatelnost organov prokuratury // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2021. — T. 16. — № 11 (132). — S. 187–193.

8. Bellman R. An Introduction to Artifical Intelligence: Can Computer Think? — San Francisco: Boyd and Fraster Publishing Company, 1978. — 146 p.

9. Bostrom N. Strategic Implications of Openness in AI Development / Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom // Global Policy. — 2017. — 9 February. — P. 1–14. — URL: https://nickbostrom.com/papers/openness.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2022).

10. Feng-Hsiung Hsu. Behind Deep Blue — Building the Computer that Defeated the World Chess Champion. — Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. — 328 p.

11. Li J., Liu U., Yue L., Jin F., Xu Q., Xu C. Artificial Intelligence Governed by Laws and regulations // Reconstructing Our Orders: Artificial Intelligence and Human Society / ed. D. Jin. — Shanghai: Shanghai University Press, Springer, 2019. — P. 61–98.

12. Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge // Nature. — 2017. — 19 October. — Vol. 550. — No. 7676. — P. 354–359. — URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature24270 (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2022).

13. McClelland S. The Difference Between Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning // IoT for all. — 2017. — 4 Dec. — URL: https://medium.com/iotforall/the-difference-between-artificial-intelligencemachine-learning-and-deep-learning-3aa67bff5991 (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2022).

14. Riedl M. O., Harrison B. Using Stories to Teach Human Values to Artificial Agents // Georgia Tech. — 2016. — 12 Feb. — URL: https://faculty.cc.gatech.edu/~riedl/pubs/aaai-ethics16.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 04.07.2022).

15. Turing A. Computing machinery and intelligence // Mind. — 1950. — № 59. — P. 433–460.

16. Wiener N. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. — 2nd revised ed. — Paris: Hermann & Cie, Camb. Mass. (MIT Press), 1961. — 212 p.


Review

For citations:


Berezina E.A. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Juridical Activities. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2022;17(12):25-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.145.12.025-038

Views: 699


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)