Comprehensive Research within the Framework of Mono-Expertise in the context of Digitalization (Forensic Phonoscopic Examination Case)
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.149.4.146-153
Abstract
The paper substantiates the need to develop a new private theory of forensic expertology: the theory of digitalization of forensic activities, within which the problem of complexity deserves special attention. For these purposes, the author studies one of the forms of integration, known in forensic expertology as «a comprehensive study within the framework of one examination (mono-expertise)». The author draws attention to the epistemological essence of such a study, focuses on its distinctive features. The forensic phonoscopic examination case is an example of the problems of forensic examination of digital traces analysis. The author highlights the factors that contribute to the successful evolution of forensic phonoscopic examination in the context of digitalization (creation of a system for training expert phonoscopists, improvement of methodological support and an automated workplace for an expert), a list of expert situations that require the appointment of a comprehensive forensic phonoscopic and computer-technical examination.
Keywords
About the Author
A. V. KorinRussian Federation
Aleksey V. Korin, Postgraduate Student, Department of Forensic Examination, Manager, Center for Change Management
ul. Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya, d. 9, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Bodrov N. F., Lebedeva A. K. Perspektivy sudebno-ekspertnogo issledovaniya sintezirovannoy zvuchashchey rechi // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2021. — № 3. — S. 9–13.
2. Galyashina E. I. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye osnovy sudebnoy fonoskopicheskoy ekspertizy: spetsialnost 12.00.09 «Ugolovnyy protsess»: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — Voronezh, 2002. — 478 s.
3. Galyashina E. I. Sovremennye problemy ekspertizy tsifrovykh fonogramm // Sovremennye problemy tsifrovizatsii kriminalisticheskoy i sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatelnosti: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Moskva, 5 aprelya 2019 g.). — M.: RG-Press, 2019. — S. 54–61.
4. Lebedeva A. K. Tekhnologii golosovogo sinteza i sudebnaya fonoskopicheskaya ekspertiza // Vestnik kriminalistiki. — 2020. — № 3 (75). — S. 55–60.
5. Rossinskaya E. R. Nauchnaya shkola sudebnoy ekspertologii kafedry sudebnykh ekspertiz i ee rol v issledovanii problem tsifrovizatsii sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatelnosti // Novelly Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii i zadachi yuridicheskoy nauki: materialy konferentsii (Moskva, 24–27 noyabrya 2020 g.): v 5 ch. — M.: RG-Press, 2021. — Ch. 4. — S. 362–367.
6. Rossinskaya E. R. Problemy kompleksnosti v teorii i zakonodatelstve o sudebnoy ekspertize // Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy. — 2012. — № 3 (27). — S. 38–43.
7. Rossinskaya E. R. Teoriya informatsionno-kompyuternogo obespecheniya sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatelnosti kak novaya chastnaya teoriya sudebnoy ekspertologii // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2022. — № 2 (90). — S. 27–40.
Review
For citations:
Korin A.V. Comprehensive Research within the Framework of Mono-Expertise in the context of Digitalization (Forensic Phonoscopic Examination Case). Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2023;18(4):146-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.149.4.146-153