Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Presumption of Innocence and Trial by Jury

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.155.10.155-165

Abstract

The paper examines the Anglo-Saxon and continental approaches to understanding the principle of the presumption of innocence. It is concluded that in Russia this principle was established and implemented in the spirit of continental legal logic. The effect of the presumption of innocence and the provisions arising from it (the principle of in dubio pro reo, the rule that the accused is not obliged to prove his innocence, etc.) when considering a criminal case by a Russian court with the participation of jurors is examined. The features of evidence in this form of legal proceedings, the relationship of the presumption of innocence with the right of jurors to find the defendant innocent if it is fully proven that they committed a criminal act (criminal law nullification) are considered. The conclusion is substantiated that it is in a trial with a jury that the presumption of innocence is most fully realized; it contains additional guarantees of its strict observance.

About the Author

M. A. Malina
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation

Maksim A. Malina - Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics, Southern Federal University.

Bolshaya Sadovaya ul., d. 105/42, Rostov-on-Don, 344006



References

1. Bobrishchev-Pushkin A. M. Empiricheskie zakony deyatelnosti russkogo suda prisyazhnykh. — M.: Kniga po trebovaniyu, 2013. — 624 s.

2. Vetrova G. N. Sud prisyazhnykh i problema ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo». — 1999. — № 3. — S. 24–29.

3. Vladimirov L. E. Sud prisyazhnykh: usloviya deystviya instituta prisyazhnykh i metod razrabotki dokazatelstv. — M.: Lenand, 2016. — 264 s.

4. Golovko L. V. Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa. — M.: Statut, 2021. — 1328 s.

5. Golovko L. V. Prezumptsiya nevinovnosti i anglo-amerikanskiy ugolovnyy protsess: problemy sovmestimosti // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2016. — № 4. — S. 29–34.

6. Golovko L. V. Printsip in dubio pro duriore i teoriya neustranimykh somneniy, ili O polze izucheniya shveytsarskoy ugolovno-protsessualnoy doktriny // Zakon. — 2016. — № 8. — S. 72–84.

7. Golovko L. V. Sud prisyazhnykh i kachestvo predvaritelnogo sledstviya: est li korrelyatsiya? // Rassledovanie prestupleniy: problemy i puti ikh resheniya. — 2019. — № 1. — S. 58–62.

8. Dzhanshiev G. Sud nad sudom prisyazhnykh. — M.: Rassvet, 1896. — 181 s.

9. Esakov G. «Nullifikatsiya» ugolovnogo zakona v sude s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2013. — № 2. — S. 121–129.

10. Karnozova L. M. Vozrozhdennyy sud prisyazhnykh. Zamysel i problemy stanovleniya. — M.: Nota Bene, 2000. — 368 s.

11. Kleandrov M. I. Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii i uchastie grazhdan v osushchestvlenii pravosudiya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2018. — № 12. — S. 30–43.

12. Koni A. F. Zakon i spravedlivost. Stati i rechi. — M.: Eksmo, — 2013. — 640 s.

13. Mittermayer K. Evropeyskie i amerikanskie sudy prisyazhnykh, ikh deyatelnost, dostoinstva, nedostatki i sredstva k ustraneniyu etikh nedostatkov. Perevod s poslednego nemetskogo izdaniya: Vyp. 1–2. — M.: D. Dril, 1869. — 602 s.

14. Nasonov S. A. Sudebnoe sledstvie v sude prisyazhnykh: zakonodatelstvo, teoriya, praktika. — M.: R. Valent, 2001. — 189 s.

15. Pashin S. A. Postanovka voprosov pered kollegiey prisyazhnykh zasedateley // Sostyazatelnoe pravosudie: trudy nauchno-prakticheskikh laboratoriy. Vyp. 1 Ch. 1. — M.: Mezhdunarodnyy komitet sodeystviya pravovoy reforme, 1996. — 224 s.

16. Polyanskiy N. N. Tsel ugolovnogo protsessa. — Yaroslavl, 1919. — 35 s.

17. Strogovich M. S. Pravo obvinyaemogo na zashchitu i prezumptsiya nevinovnosti. — M.: Nauka, 1984. — 143 s.

18. Foynitskiy I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. T. 1. — SPb.: Alfa, 1996. — 552 s.


Review

For citations:


Malina M.A. Presumption of Innocence and Trial by Jury. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2023;18(10):155-165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.155.10.155-165

Views: 371


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)