Differentiation of the Competence of the Prosecutor's Office and the Court to Ensure the Legality of Operational Investigative Activities
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.160.3.195-207
Abstract
The relevance of the study is determined by the role and place of the legal institution for the protection of human, civil rights, and freedoms as an attribute of the rule of law, the need for proper control and supervision
of their compliance.
The Constitution of the Russian Federation proclaims that a person, his rights and freedoms are the highest value, and the state is obliged to recognize, respect and protect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, judicial protection is guaranteed to everyone. This implies, on the one hand, that everyone is guaranteed to ensure the implementation of the active right to appeal in court decisions, actions or inactions of public authorities and their officials, and on the other hand, verification of compliance with the passive right, which is mainly implemented through control and supervisory procedures. At the same time, in the process of implementing certain functions of the state (in particular, law enforcement), authorized bodies are allowed to apply measures that significantly limit the fundamental constitutional rights and freedoms of a person. An important place among these types of state activities is occupied by operational investigative activities (OIA). In the field of OIA, citizens are often limited in their ability to independently defend their rights and legitimate interests, and therefore a special role in this area is given to the court and the prosecutor’s office. As part of the study, an attempt was made to comprehensively study the theoretical, legal and practical issues of organizing the activities of the prosecutor and the court to protect human and civil rights, the legitimate interests of legal entities in the production of operational investigations, analyze the relationship between prosecutorial and judicial activities, and develop an organic mechanism for their implementation, excluding «mutual substitution» and duplication of competencies.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. L. NikitinRussian Federation
Evgeniy L. Nikitin, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor
Department of Prosecutorial Supervision and Participation of Prosecutors in Consideration of Criminal, Civil and Arbitrazh Cases by the Courts
St. Petersburg
V. S. Zorin
Russian Federation
Vladimir S. Zorin, Postgraduate Student, Leading Consultant
St. Petersburg
References
1. Azarov V. A., Tarichko I. Yu. Funktsiya sudebnogo kontrolya v istorii, teorii i praktike ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii : monografiya. — Omsk: Omskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2004. — 379 s.
2. Atmazhitov V. M., Bobrov V. G. Operativno-rozysknye meropriyatiya: aktualnye voprosy teorii i praktiki // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2005. — № 3.
3. Babichev D. A. Sudebnyy kontrol v obespechenii zakonnosti i obosnovannosti resheniy, prinimaemykh operativnymi podrazdeleniyami organov vnutrennikh del // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». — 2020. — T. 24. — № 2. — S. 389– 409.
4. Baskov V. I., Korobeynikov B. V. Kurs prokurorskogo nadzora : uchebnik. — M.: Zertsalo, 2000. — 512 s.
5. Vagin O. A., Isichenko A. P., Shabanov G. Kh. Operativno-rozysknye meropriyatiya i ispolzovanie ikh rezultatov : ucheb.-prakticheskoe posobie. — M.: Izd. dom Shumilovoy I. I., 2006. — 118 s.
6. Galuzo V. N. Sudebnyy kontrol za zakonnostyu i obosnovannostyu soderzhaniya pod strazhey podozrevaemykh i obvinyaemykh na stadii predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 1995. — 29 s.
7. Goryainov K. K., Kvasha Yu. F., Surkov K. V. Federalnyy zakon «Ob operativno-rozysknoy deyatelnosti» : kommentariy. — M., 1997. — 570 s.
8. Guskova A. P. Protsessualno-pravovye i organizatsionnye voprosy podgotovki k sudebnomu zasedaniyu po UPK RF : monografiya. — Orenburg: IPK OGU. — 2002. — 107 s.
9. Daev V. G., Marshunov M. N. Osnovy teorii prokurorskogo nadzora. — L.: Izdatelstvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1990. — 135 s.
10. Doroshkov V. V. Mirovoy sudya. Istoricheskie, organizatsionnye i protsessualnye aspekty deyatelnosti. — M.: Norma, 2004. — 320 s.
11. Zuev V. I. Operativno-rozysknaya deyatelnost : uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. — Orenburg: Izd. tsentr OGAU, 2007. — 378 s.
12. Kovtun N. N. Sudebnyy kontrol v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii: monografiya. — N. Novgorod: Nizhegorodskaya pravovaya akademiya, 2002. — 331 s.
13. Kozusev A. F. Polnomochiya prokurora po nadzoru za ispolneniem zakonov v operativno-rozysknoy deyatelnosti // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2010. — № 10. — S. 3–9.
14. Kozusev A. F. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya prokurorskogo nadzora, sudebnogo i vedomstvennogo kontrolya za ispolneniem zakonov v operativno-rozysknoy deyatelnosti. — M.: Institut povysheniya kvalifikatsii rukovodyashchikh kadrov Generalnoy prokuratury RF, 2002. — 91 s.
15. Kozusev A. F. Prokurorskiy nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov v operativno-rozysknoy deyatelnosti: sovremennye problemy teorii i praktiki : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2001. — 45 s.
16. Kolokolov N. A. Sudebnyy kontrol v stadii predvaritelnogo rassledovaniya: realnost, perspektivy // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1998. — № 11.
17. Lazareva V. A. Sudebnaya vlast. Sudebnaya zashchita. Sudebnyy kontrol: ponyatie i sootnoshenie : lektsii-ocherki. — Samara: Izd-vo Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii, 1999. — 63 s.
18. Lebedev V. M. Sudebnaya zashchita svobody i lichnoy neprikosnovennosti grazhdan na predvaritelnom sledstvii : ucheb. posobie. — M.: RAP, 2001. — 158 s.
19. Lomovskiy V. D. Prokurorsko-nadzornye pravootnosheniya. — Rostov n/D: Izdatelstvo Rostovskogo universiteta, 1987.
20. Lukovnikov G. D. Sledstvennye deystviya i operativno-rozysknye meropriyatiya : ucheb. posobie. — M.: RPA Minyusta Rossii, 2013. — 236 s.
21. Nazarov A. D. Vliyanie sledstvennykh oshibok na oshibki suda. — SPb.: Yuridicheskiy tsentr, 2003. — 321 s.
22. Petrukhin I. L. Prokurorskiy nadzor i sudebnyy kontrol za sledstviem // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 1998. — № 9.
23. Skosarev V. V. Predmet i predely prokurorskogo nadzora v sfere operativno-razysknoy deyatelnosti organov vnutrennikh del // Problemy teorii i praktiki operativno-razysknoy deyatelnosti : materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. — M.: VNII MVD Rossii, 2002. — S. 75–80.
24. Sudebnaya vlast i pravosudie v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: kurs lektsiy / avt. kol.: V. M. Lebedev [i dr.]; pod red. V. V. Ershova. — M.: RAP, 2011. — 900 s.
25. Teoriya operativno-rozysknoy deyatelnosti : uchebnik / pod obshch. red. K. K. Goryainova, V. S. Ovchinskogo i G. K. Sinilova. — M.: Infra-M, 2012. — 689 s.
26. Khimicheva O. V. Kontseptualnye osnovy protsessualnogo kontrolya i nadzora na dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: monografiya. — M.: Yuniti-Dana, 2004. — 287 s.
27. Chechetin A. E. Operativno-rozysknye meropriyatiya i prava lichnosti : monografiya. — Barnaul: Barnaulskiy yuridicheskiy institut, 2006. — 147 s.
28. Shalumov M. S. Sudebnyy kontrol i prokurorskiy nadzor: ne mezhdousobitsa, a vzaimodeystvie // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2001. — № 4. — S. 15–16.
29. Shumilov A. Yu. Yuridicheskie osnovy operativno-rozysknykh meropriyatiy : ucheb. posobie. — M., 1999. — 127 s.
Review
For citations:
Nikitin E.L., Zorin V.S. Differentiation of the Competence of the Prosecutor's Office and the Court to Ensure the Legality of Operational Investigative Activities. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(3):195-207. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.160.3.195-207