Recognition of Arbitral Awards as Prejudicial Decisions

The paper deals with the problem of such a characteristic of arbitral awards as prejudice in relation to the consideration of cases by courts of general jurisdiction and arbitrazh courts. Despite the fact that more and more researchers and practitioners are inclined to recognize the decisions of arbitrazh courts as prejudicial, the work substantiates that such decisions cannot have a prejudicial significance for the consideration of cases in state courts. This takes place due to the fact that arbitrazh courts do not belong to the agencies for the administration of justice, and therefore arbitral awards represent the result of a private-law method of dispute resolution and, accordingly, do not have a public-law character. However, the prejudice of the circumstances established by the arbitral awards is not excluded if the State courts comply with a certain procedure. The paper attempts to describe the procedure for recognizing the circumstances contained in the arbitral award as prejudicial.

1. Anurov V. N. Preyuditsialnost v arbitrazhnom razbiratelstve // Treteyskiy sud. — 2019. — № 1/2 (117/118). — S. 202–226.

2. Bereziy A. E., Musin V. A. O preyuditsii sudebnykh aktov // Vestnik VAS RF. — № 6. — 2001. — S. 61–68.

3. Volozhanin V. P. Nesudebnye formy razresheniya grazhdansko-pravovykh sporov. — Sverdlovsk: Sred.-Ural. kn. izd-vo, 1974. — 203 s.

4. Gavrilenko V. A. Svoystvo preyuditsialnosti resheniy treteyskikh sudov // Ispolnitelnoe pravo. — 2006. — № 3. — S. 9–10.

5. Dubrovina M. A. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh v Shveytsarii: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2001. — 210 s.

6. Dubrovskaya I. Treteyskiy mezhdusoboychik // EZh-Yurist. — 2015. — № 33.

7. Zvereva N. S. Vzaimodeystvie alternativnykh metodov uregulirovaniya sporov i grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva v prave Rossii i Frantsii / pod red. V. V. Yarkova. — M.: Statut, 2017. — 384 s.

8. Ilin D. V., Borisova A. D. Preyuditsialnost arbitrazhnykh resheniy v Rossii // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. — 2021. — № 6. — S. 167–192.

9. Ilichev P. A. Problemy preyuditsii v treteyskom razbiratelstve // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2020. — № 2. — S. 125–132.

10. Kostin A. A. Problema preyuditsialnoy sily resheniy mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh arbitrazhey v zakonodatelstve RF // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2014. — № 3. — S. 493–498.

11. Kurochkin S. A. Treteyskoe razbiratelstvo i mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh. — M.: Statut, 2017. — 288 s.

12. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: uchebnik / S. A. Abesadze, T. K. Andreeva, V. N. Anurov [i dr.]; otv. red. T. A. Lunaeva; nauch. red. O. Yu. Skvortsov, M. Yu. Savranskiy, G. V. Sevastyanov. — 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. — SPb.: Redaktsiya zhurnala «Treteyskiy sud»; M.: Statut, 2018. — 965 s.

13. Balashov A. N., Zaytsev A. I., Zaytseva Yu. A. Treteyskoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ucheb. posobie. — M.: Yustitsinform, 2008. — 223 s.

14. Fursov D. A. Treteyskie sudy: predely legitimnosti ikh resheniy: ucheb. posobie. — M.: Statut, 2009. — 150 s.

15. Chupakhin I. M. Reshenie treteyskogo suda: teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy. — M.: Infotropik Media, 2015. — 188 s.

16. Yarkov V. V. Arbitrazhnyy sud i mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh. Nekotorye napravleniya vzaimodeystviya // Vestnik Federalnogo arbitrazhnogo suda Uralskogo okruga. — 2007. — № 2. — S. 118–128