Problems of Systematization of Contracts for Intellectual Products Creation

Systematization of contracts makes it possible to solve the problems of contractual regulation at the legislative level. The problem of contract systematization in civil law in general and in intellectual property law is that in science there is no unified approach regarding the choice of classification criterion that can be used as its basis. Systematization of contracts aimed at creating intellectual products is a «hot button» of the current legislation, the practice of its application and legal science. The paper reasonably points out that the legislative decisions presented in section VII of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, are ill-conceived and ignore the principle of systematic construction of legislation on contractual obligations aimed at creating intellectual products. An analysis of the rules on contracts aimed at creating works as objects of copyright, and research and development agreements was carried out. The paper proposes amendments to the legislation as to transfer of the rules on the creation of intellectual products to Section IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and changes in the structure and content of Chapter 38 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

1. Belousov V. N. Dogovory na vypolnenie nauchno-issledovatelskikh, opytno-konstruktorskikh i tekhnologicheskikh rabot // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. — 2019. — № 11. — S. 91–95.

2. Belkova E. G. Rezultat v dogovore na vypolnenie nauchno-issledovatelskikh rabot // Problemy sovremennogo zakonodatelstva Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran: materialy V Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii / otv. red. S. I. Suslova, A. P. Ushakova. — Irkutsk: VGUYu (RPA Minyusta Rossii), 2016. — S. 170–171.

3. Braginskiy M. I., Vitryanskiy V. V. Dogovornoe pravo. Dogovory o vypolnenii rabot i okazanii uslug. — Izd. ispr. i dop. — Kn. 3. — M.: Statut, 2002. — 1055 s.

4. Vitko V. S. Pravovaya priroda dogovorov o sozdanii proizvedeniy nauki, literatury i iskusstva. — M.: Statut, 2019. — 240 s.

5. Gavrilov E., Gavrilov K. Dogovory zakaza na sozdanie avtorskikh proizvedeniy // Khozyaystvo i pravo. — 2013. — № 3. — S. 28–47.

6. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik: v 2 t. / O. G. Alekseeva, E. R. Aminov, M. V. Bando [i dr.]; pod red. B. M. Gongalo. — 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. — T. 2. — M.: Statut, 2018. T. 2. — 558 s.

7. Kopylov A. Yu. Dogovor na vypolnenie nauchno-issledovatelskikh, opytno-konstruktorskikh i tekhnologicheskikh rabot: mesto v sisteme dogovorov na sozdanie rezultatov intellektualnoy deyatelnosti // Intellektualnye prava: vyzovy XXI veka: sbornik dokladov IV Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Tomsk, 9–12 noyabrya 2022 g. — Tomsk: Natsionalnyy issledovatelskiy Tomskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 2022. — S. 168–174.

8. Mishenin A. I. Teoriya ekonomicheskikh informatsionnykh sistem: uchebnik. — 4-e izd., dop. i pererab. — M.: Finansy i statistika, 2000. — 240 s.

9. Mozolin V. P. O kontseptsii intellektualnykh prav // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2007. — № 12. — S. 100–108.

10. Otdelnye vidy obyazatelstv / B. S. Antimonov, I. L. Braude, K. A. Grave [i dr.] / pod obshch. red. K. A. Grave, I. B. Novitskogo. — M.: Gosyurizdat, 1954. — 360 s.

11. Pravo intellektualnoy sobstvennosti: uchebnik / E. V. Badulina, D. A. Gavrilov, E. S. Grin [i dr.]; pod obshch. red. L. A. Novoselovoy. — T. 1: Obshchie polozheniya. — M.: Statut, 2017. — 512 s.

12. Protasov V. N., Protasova N. V. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava i teorii gosudarstva. — M.: Gorodets, 2010. — 751 s