Normative Content and Practice of Application of the Principle of General (Aggregate) Cost Coverage in the Budget System of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.163.6.021-039
Abstract
The paper presents a comprehensive study of the importance of the principle of general (aggregate) cost coverage for the formation of the Russian budget system, formation of budget and tax legislation, implementation of modern budget policy and development of law enforcement practice. Special attention is paid not only to the doctrinal and theoretical understanding of this principle, but also to the systematization and research of various introduced practices of linking budget expenditures with specific sources of revenues (primarily mandatory public payments) or financing budget deficits. The paper presents various legislative proposals for the introduction of exceptions to the prohibition of linking budget expenditures and certain budget revenues, which were rejected due to their contradiction to the principle of total (aggregate) cost coverage. The study allowed the author to make proposals based on the constitutional principle of mutual trust between the State and society. By introducing a mandatory public payment, the payment of which is conditioned by the purpose of carrying out special expenses of public authorities, the state must create a guaranteed target mechanism for financing such expenses using special mechanisms for accumulating budget revenues.
Keywords
About the Author
I. S. AndreechevRussian Federation
Igor S. Andreechev, Deputy Head of Administration — Director of the Legal Department
Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
References
1. Arbatskaya Yu. V., Vasileva N. V. Sovershenstvovanie finansovogo obespecheniya dorozhnoy deyatelnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: pravovoy aspekt // Izvestiya Irkutskoy gosudarstvennoy ekonomicheskoy akademii. — 2014. — № 6 (98). — S. 139–145.
2. Artyukh A. A. Otvetstvennost gosudarstva za ushcherb ot nekonstitutsionnykh fiskalnykh zakonov: vremya eshche ne prishlo? // Nalogoved. — 2016. — № 7. — S. 38–47.
3. Vasyanina E. L. Fiskalnoe pravo / pod red. S. V. Zapolskogo. — M., 2013. — 152 s.
4. Ginzburg Yu. V. Evolyutsiya transportnogo naloga: ot fiskalnoy k ekologicheskoy funktsii // Finansovoe pravo. — 2013. — № 11. — S. 27–31.
5. Dymberov A. D. Administrativno-pravovye aspekty organizatsii deyatelnosti po ispolzovaniyu spetsialnykh tekhnicheskikh sredstv avtomaticheskoy fiksatsii pravonarusheniy pri nadzore za dorozhnym dvizheniem // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. — 2018. — № 1. — S. 45–48.
6. Zemlyanskaya N. I. Pravovye problemy ispolzovaniya transportnogo naloga v finansirovanii dorozhnoy deyatelnosti v Rossii // Nalogi. — 2014. — № 1. — S. 22–25.
7. Kleymenova M. O. Nalogovoe pravo: ucheb. posobie. — M.: Moskovskiy finansovo-promyshlennyy universitet «Sinergiya», 2013.
8. Komyagin D. L. Sistema printsipov byudzhetnogo prava: rossiyskoe zakonodatelstvo i nauchnaya doktrina // Reformy i pravo. — 2012. — № 4. — S. 19–31.
9. Kopina A. A., Kopin D. V. Sbory kak istochnik tselevogo finansirovaniya raskhodov byudzheta subekta i (ili) munitsipalnogo obrazovaniya // Finansovoe pravo. — 2017. — № 4. — S. 6–12.
10. Kopina A. A. Problemy realizatsii kompensatsionnoy funktsii utilizatsionnogo sbora // Finansovoe pravo. — 2017. — № 8. — S. 10–14.
11. Kucherov I. I. Teoriya nalogov i sborov (pravovye aspekty): monografiya. — M.: YurInfoR, 2009. — 473 s.
12. Lunyakova N. A. Teoreticheskie osnovy ekonomicheskogo soderzhaniya byudzhetnogo fonda // Finansy i kredit. — 2020. — T. 26. — № 4 (796). — S. 916–930.
13. Nalogovoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik / otv. red. Yu. A. Krokhina. — 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M.: Norma, 2008. — 463 s.
14. Nalogovoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. I. A. Tsindeliani. — 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M.: Prospekt, 2019. — 704 s.
15. Narutto S. V., Nikitina A. V. Konstitutsionnyy printsip doveriya v sovremennom rossiyskom obshchestve // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2022. — № 7. — S. 13–18.
16. Naumova V. A. Perspektivy primeneniya novogo poryadka formirovaniya istochnikov finansirovaniya likvidatsii nakoplennogo vreda okruzhayushchey srede // Ekologicheskoe pravo. — 2022. — № 4. — S. 34–39.
17. Ogurtsova M. L. Otdelnye voprosy zashchity prav detey s redkimi (orfannymi) zabolevaniyami na lekarstvennoe obespechenie // Sotsialnoe i pensionnoe pravo. — 2023. — № 1. — S. 41–45.
18. Osipova E. S. Mekhanizm deystviya i sotsialnaya spravedlivost izmeneniy po NDFL // Nalogi. — 2021. — № 1. — S. 20–25.
19. Pilipenko A. A. Printsip podderzhaniya doveriya k zakonu i deystviyam gosudarstva: nalogovye aspekty // Nalogi. — 2020. — № 1. — S. 18–23.
20. Reut A. V. Fiskalnaya i reguliruyushchaya funktsii utilizatsionnogo sbora // Finansovoe pravo. — 2013. — № 3. — S. 17–20.
21. Finansovoe pravo: uchebnik. — 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. / otv. red. S. V. Zapolskiy. — M.: Kontrakt, Volters Kluver, 2011. — 760 s.
22. Kharisov I. F. Nalog kak instrument natsionalnoy rynochnoy ekonomiki // Finansovoe pravo. — 2008. — № 11. — S. 26–29.
23. Sharova M. A. Nalogooblozhenie i nalogovye lgoty pri predostavlenii i poluchenii obrazovatelnykh uslug // Reformy i pravo. — 2015. — № 3. — S. 33–46.
Review
For citations:
Andreechev I.S. Normative Content and Practice of Application of the Principle of General (Aggregate) Cost Coverage in the Budget System of the Russian Federation. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(6):21-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.163.6.021-039