Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Participation of the Prosecutor in the Civil Cases Dealt with by the Courts of Controlling Authority

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.164.7.086-100

Abstract

In the paper, the author concludes that it is inappropriate to regulate the procedural and legal competence of various officials of the prosecutor’s office to initiate a review of judicial acts by the courts of controlling authority. The author examines the issue of the possibility of allocating the prosecutor’s participation in the consideration of civil cases by the courts of controlling authority into an independent, third form of the prosecutor’s participation in civil (arbitrazh) proceedings in the light of both the legislative expansion of the prosecutor’s procedural powers and trends in judicial practice. The author draws attention to the need to clarify in the law the legal form by which the prosecutor’s initiative aimed at reviewing judicial acts is implemented. As a result of the analysis of judicial practice where the courts and the prosecutor assessed the need for the prosecutor’s participation in specific cases in different ways, the author concluded that the correctness of resolving the issue of involving (not involving) the prosecutor to participate in the consideration of a civil case is predetermined by an essential rather than a formal approach to the legal qualification by the court of the substantive requirements under consideration.

About the Author

T. A. Litvinova
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Tatiana A. Litvinova, Postgraduate Student, Lecturer, Department of Civil and Administrative Procedure, Deputy Head of the Legal Department

Moscow



References

1. Amirbekov K. I., Magomedov M. A. Polnomochiya prokurora i ikh klassifikatsiya // Yuridicheskiy mir. — 2016. — № 2. — S. 39–44.

2. Arsanukaeva M. S. Nekotorye problemy unifikatsii zakonodatelstva, reguliruyushchego uchastie prokurora v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse // Yustitsiya. — 2016. — № 1. — S. 78–87.

3. Bezrukavaya N. I. Predmet deyatelnosti prokurora po uchastiyu v rassmotrenii sudami del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2018. — № 4. — S. 18–25.

4. Bessarabov V. G. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik. — M.: Prospekt, 2006. — 535 s.

5. Vaypan V. A., Gladkikh S. R. Novyy Grazhdanskiy protsessualnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Pravo i ekonomika. — 2002. — № 12. — S. 3–13.

6. Vorobev T. N. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy uchastiya prokurora v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Saratov, 2019. — 202 s.

7. Ergashev E. R. Protsessualnye i inye sredstva i akty prokurorskogo reagirovaniya: pravovaya priroda i problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. — 2022. — № 2. — S. 122–129.

8. Ergashev E. R., Pankova A. A. Problemy uchastiya prokurora v rassmotrenii del arbitrazhnymi sudami // Elektronnoe prilozhenie k «Rossiyskomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu». — 2020. — № 2. — S. 53–60.

9. Zhenetl S. Z. Nesoglasovannost nekotorykh norm v novykh zakonakh // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2003. — № 9. — S. 42–44.

10. Zhuykov V. M. GPK RF: poryadok vvedeniya v deystvie // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2003. — № 2. — S. 2–6.

11. Zalyukova G. I. Polnomochiya prokurorov razlichnykh urovney na obzhalovanie nezakonnykh sudebnykh aktov v apellyatsionnom poryadke // Zakonnost. — 2013. — № 9. — S. 26–27.

12. Kazarina T. N. Prokuror kak subekt tsivilisticheskikh protsessualnykh pravootnosheniy v kontekste unifikatsii protsessualnogo zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Rossiyskiy sudya. — 2021. — № 2. — S. 3–6; № 3. — S. 6–10.

13. Kovalev A. A. Uchastie prokurora v rassmotrenii grazhdanskikh del sudami apellyatsionnoy instantsii // Pravo i politika. — 2021. — № 4. — S. 1–9. — DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2021.4.35399. — URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=35399.

14. Kostrova N. M., Gadzhialieva N. Sh. Uchastie prokurora v proverochnykh sudebnykh instantsiyakh tsivilisticheskogo protsessa // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2018. — № 4. — S. 128–133.

15. Kulik T. Yu. K voprosu o edinstve terminologii, opredelyayushchey uchastie prokurora v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2017. — № 11. — S. 12–15.

16. Larionova O. G. Protsessualnye voprosy uchastiya prokurorov v grazhdanskom i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve (na primere sudebnoy praktiki rayonnykh sudov g. Moskvy i Moskovskogo gorodskogo suda) // Problemy realizatsii polnomochiy prokurora v grazhdanskom, administrativnom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: sbornik materialov kruglogo stola (g. Moskva, 26 oktyabrya 2018 g.) / pod obshch. red. d-ra yurid. nauk N. V. Subanovoy; sost. i nauch. red.: M. V. Mamatov, O. V. Bobrova. — M., 2018. — S. 54–59.

17. Mamatov M. V., Kremneva E. V. Rasshirenie protsessualnykh polnomochiy prokurorov po protivodeystviyu nezakonnym finansovym operatsiyam // Zakonnost. — 2017. — № 12. — S. 13–17.

18. Panchenko V. Yu., Makarchuk I. Yu. Predstavlenie kak pravovoe sredstvo // Zakonodatelstvo i ekonomika. — 2014. — № 6. — S. 36–47.

19. Perlov I. D. Kassatsionnoe proizvodstvo v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. — M.: Yurid. lit., 1968. — 395 s.

20. Prokuror v grazhdanskom protsesse: posobie dlya rayon. prokurorov / sost. S. M. Zagore i A. B. Fridenshteyn. — M.: Yurizdat, 1941. — 64 s.

21. Prokurorskiy nadzor: uchebnik: v 2 t. T. 1: Obshchaya chast / pod obshch. red. O. S. Kapinus. — 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M.: Yurayt, 2019. — 210 s.

22. Sayfudinova A. A. K voprosu ob uchastvuyushchikh v dele litsakh kak subektakh grazhdanskikh protsessualnykh otnosheniy // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2020. — № 1. — S. 17–21.

23. Simonova I. S., Sokolov M. S. Pravovye i organizatsionnye osnovy uchastiya prokurorov v rassmotrenii grazhdanskikh i administrativnykh del apellyatsionnymi i kassatsionnymi sudami obshchey yurisdiktsii // Vestnik Universiteta prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii. — 2022. — № 2. — S. 59–66.

24. Sinelshchikova E. Yu., Ilyakov A. D. Mery prokurorskogo reagirovaniya na narusheniya zakonov o protivodeystvii korruptsii // Zakonnost. — 2019. — № 8. — S. 7–11.

25. Smagina E. S. Uchastie gosudarstva v sovremennom tsivilisticheskom protsesse. — M.: Statut, 2021. — 268 s.

26. Smagina E. S. Problemy rasshireniya polnomochiy prokurora v tsivilisticheskom protsesse // Uchenie o grazhdanskom protsesse: nastoyashchee i budushchee: sbornik dokladov na II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoykonferentsii pamyati M. K. Treushnikova. Moskva, 9 fevralya 2023 g. / pod red. V. V. Molchanova. — M., 2023. — 334 s.

27. Smirnova O. V. Aktualnye voprosy uchastiya prokurora v sude po grazhdanskim delam v poryadke ch. 1 st. 45 GPK RF // Problemy realizatsii polnomochiy prokurora v grazhdanskom, administrativnom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: sbornik materialov kruglogo stola (g. Moskva, 26 oktyabrya 2018 g.) / pod obshch. red. d-ra yurid. nauk N. V. Subanovoy; sost. i nauch. red.: M. V. Mamatov, O. V. Bobrova. — M., 2018. — S. 136–140.

28. Sredstva prokurorskoy deyatelnosti: problemy teorii i praktiki: monografiya / O. N. Korshunova, V. V. Lavrov, E. L. Nikitin [i dr.]. — M.: Rusayns, 2019. — 268 s.

29. Tokareva E. V. Zashchita prokurorom publichnogo interesa v grazhdanskom protsesse: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.15. — SPb., 2014. — 215 s.

30. Torgovchenkov V. I. Institut uchastiya prokurora v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve // Zakonnost. — 2015. — № 7. — S. 45–49.

31. Torgovchenkov V. I. Uchastie prokurora v delakh ob ustanovlenii fakta trudovykh otnosheniy // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. — 2022. — № 10. — S. 13–15; № 12. — S. 3–5.

32. Tumanova L. V. Zashchita publichno-pravovykh interesov v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — SPb., 2002. — 338 s.

33. Shobukhin V. Yu. Polnomochiya prokurora: aktualnye problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2013. — № 11. — S. 35–38.


Review

For citations:


Litvinova T.A. Participation of the Prosecutor in the Civil Cases Dealt with by the Courts of Controlling Authority. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(7):86-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.164.7.086-100

Views: 305


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)