Forms of Human Rights Activities Implemented within the Framework of the Institute of the Financial Ombudsman
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.162.5.018-029
Abstract
The paper analyzes the activities of the Institute of the Financial Ombudsman aimed to protect the rights and legitimate interests of consumers of financial services. The paper explains that human rights protection is carried out in two forms: procedural and non-procedural. According to the author, the procedural form of the human rights protection of the Institute of the Financial Ombudsman represents public relations between the Financial Ombudsman, consumers and financial organizations in the process of considering appeals under Federal Law No. 123-FZ dated 04.06.2018 «On the Ombudsman for Consumer Rights of Financial Services» and forms consistently carried out activities of the financial ombudsman as a public entity, related to the establishment of the factual circumstances of the dispute between the consumer and the financial institution, the application of their legal norms, the definition of protective measures, the issuance of a decision and the monitoring of its execution. The paper explains such areas of human rights activities implemented in a non-procedural form as consulting and educational work, expert and analytical activities, interaction and cooperation with human rights organizations and civil society institutions, improvement of legislation, consideration of appeals in accordance with Federal Law No. 59-FZ dated 02.05.2006 «On the procedure for considering appeals from Citizens of the Russian Federation». It is concluded that the combination of procedural and non-procedural forms within the framework of the institution of the Financial Ombudsman gives human rights activities a systemic character, comprehensively ensuring protection of consumers of financial services.
Keywords
About the Author
E. A. SurmenevaRussian Federation
Ekaterina A. Surmeneva - Head of Branch No. 1 of the autonomous non-profit organization «Financial Ombudsman Support Service» in Saratov; Postgraduate Student, Department of Financial, Banking and Customs Law named after Professor Nina Ivanovna Khimicheva, Saratov State Law Academy.
Saratov
References
1. Alekseev S. S. Obshchaya teoriya prava: v 2 t. T. 1. — M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1981. — 361 s.
2. Alieskerov M. A. Grazhdanskaya protsessualnaya forma // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2006. — № 8. — S. 52–55.
3. Andreev Yu. N. Mekhanizm grazhdansko-pravovoy zashchity. — M.: Norma, 2010. — 464 s.
4. Bazilevich A. I. Formy zashchity subektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Ulyanovsk, 2002. — 29 s.
5. Benditskaya O. I. Pravozashchitnaya deyatelnost yuridicheskikh assotsiatsiy (soyuzov) kak obekt teoretiko-pravovogo issledovaniya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2022. — 31 s.
6. Bolgova V. V. Formy zashchity subektivnogo prava: teoreticheskie problemy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Samara, 2000. — 38 s.
7. Butnev V. V. K ponyatiyu mekhanizma zashchity subektivnykh prav // Subektivnoe pravo: problemy osushchestvleniya i zashchity. — Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dalnevost un-ta, 1989. — S. 9–11.
8. Vershinin A. P. Sposoby zashchity grazhdanskikh prav v sude: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — SPb., 1998.
9. Volozhanin V. P. Nesudebnye formy razresheniya grazhdansko-pravovykh sporov. — Sverdlovsk: Sred.-Ural. kn. izd-vo, 1974. — 202 s.
10. Volozhanin V. P. Utochnenie nekotorykh kategoriy (ponyatiy) iskovogo proizvodstva // Voprosy teorii i praktiki grazhdanskogo protsessa: mezhvuzovskiy sbornik. — Vyp. 1. — Saratov, 1976. — S. 18–22.
11. Grazhdanskiy protsess: uchebnik / pod red. M. K. Treushnikova. — M.: Statut, 2014. — 960 s.
12. Dobrovolskiy A. A., Ivanova S. A. Osnovnye problemy iskovoy formy zashchity prava. — M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1979. — 159 s.
13. Pravozashchitnaya i pravookhranitelnaya deyatelnost gosudarstvennykh i negosudarstvennykh institutov: uchebnik / A. V. Endoltseva, Yu. V. Endoltseva, N. I. Platonova. — M.: Knorus, 2022. — 220 s.
14. Kanyukaeva A. R. K voprosu o kriteriyakh klassifikatsii protsessualnykh form zashchity // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2009. — № 1. — S. 2–6.
15. Kanyukaeva A. R. Sistema protsessualnykh form zashchity v rossiyskom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. nauk. — Saratov, 2010. — 23 s.
16. Kraynova O. I. Institut finansovogo upolnomochennogo sposoben rabotat v usloviyakh tyazheloy epidemiologicheskoy obstanovki // Vestnik Sluzhby finansovogo upolnomochennogo. — 2020. — № 1. — S. 34–35.
17. Kurylev S. V. Formy zashchity i prinuditelnogo osushchestvleniya subektivnykh prav i pravo na isk // Trudy Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — T. 22. — Vyp. 3. — Irkutsk, 1957. — S. 159–216.
18. Lukonina Yu. A. Tsifrovaya tsivilisticheskaya protsessualnaya forma: teoretiko-prikladnye aspekty: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Saratov, 2023. — 239 s.
19. Lyukina O. V. Pravovye aspekty zashchity prav potrebiteley v torgovle // Universitetskaya nauka. — 2021. — № 2 (12). — S. 214–216.
20. Mikhaylova E. V. Protsessualnye formy zashchity subektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav, svobod i zakonnykh interesov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii (sudebnye i nesudebnye): avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2013. — 46 s.
21. Pravozashchitnye organizatsii i instituty v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ucheb. posobie / pod obshch. red. V. V. Lavrova. — SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskiy yuridicheskiy institut (filial) Universiteta prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2022. — 63 s.
22. Rassakhatskaya N. A. Grazhdanskaya protsessualnaya forma: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Saratov, 1995. — 20 s.
23. Semenov V. M. K voprosu o tsennosti grazhdanskogo protsessualnogo prava i grazhdanskoy protsessualnoy formy // Kratkaya antologiya uralskoy protsessualnoy mysli: 55 let kafedre grazhdanskogo protsessa Uralskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii / pod red. V. V. Yarkova. — Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Gumanit. un-ta, 2004. — S. 102–109.
24. Sitnik A. A. Povedencheskiy nadzor na finansovom rynke // Lex russica. — 2023. — T. 76. — № 3. — S. 41–51.
25. Sorokina V. V. Protsessualnaya forma yuridicheskoy deyatelnosti v sovremennoy Rossii: voprosy teorii i praktiki: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Saratov, 2009. — 22 s.
26. Shakaryan M. S. Sootnoshenie sudebnoy formy s inymi formami zashchity subektivnykh prav grazhdan // Aktualnye problemy zashchity subektivnykh prav grazhdan i organizatsiy. — M., 1985. — S. 7–16.
27. Shuvalova A. A. Zashchita trudovykh prav i pravovykh interesov // Zashchita grazhdanskikh prav: izbrannye aspekty: sbornik statey / ruk. avt. kol. i otv. red. d-r yurid. nauk M. A. Rozhkova. — M.: Statut, 2017. — S. 396–408.
28. Chernousova K. S. Mezhdunarodnyy opyt uregulirovaniya sporov i sredstva pravovoy zashchity prav potrebiteley // Khozyaystvo i pravo. — 2022. — № 6. — S. 114–120.
29. Chechot D. M. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu. — SPb.: Izd. dom S.-Peterb. gos. un-ta, 1968. — 614 s.
30. Chulyukin L. D., Guryanova V. V., Isaev E. E. Problemy protsessualnoy formy // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. — 2022. — № 2. — S. 87–92.
Review
For citations:
Surmeneva E.A. Forms of Human Rights Activities Implemented within the Framework of the Institute of the Financial Ombudsman. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(5):18-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.162.5.018-029