Legal Foundations of State Policy on Self-Defense Weapons: In Quest of a Balance between Public and Private Interests

The debate on the right of citizens to carry short-barreled weapons, including firearms of limited destruction, has been going on for more than 30 years. The essence of these debates goes far beyond the limits of administrative law, since it is not limited only by the administrative law mechanism for implementing the procedure for acquiring, carrying and using weapons, acting as part of the public legal mechanism for ensuring personal security, security of the society and the State. The relevance of the issues of civilian arms trafficking is aggravated by the complication of the criminal situation during periods of social or economic upheavals that determine the choice of the trajectory of development of state policy for arms trafficking as an area of public law relations.
The arguments of supporters and opponents of the use of firearms for self-defense are usually accompanied by arguments based on faith and beliefs rather than on facts and measurements.
The purpose of the study is to summarize the legal and empirical resources characterizing administrative law foundations of state policy in relation to lethal and non-lethal self-defense weapons; to assess domestic legislative decisions and determine the directions for further administrative law development of state policy regarding arms trafficking, the expediency of using short-barreled weapons, including firearms of limited destruction, as selfdefense weapons.
The interdisciplinary approach made it possible to combine the results of legal and other humanitarian studies. In particular, the achievements of branches of legal sciences of Russian law are brought together: administrative law, theory and history of law, criminology and criminal studies, sociology of law.
In conclusion, the paper provides the results of a theoretical study with due regard to the historical, delictological and sociological context of the problem. The author substantiates the necessity of changing the legal foundations of state policy in the field of trafficking in self-defense weapons and gives appropriate proposals.

1. Andrienko Yu. V. V poiskakh obyasneniya rosta prestupnosti v Rossii v perekhodnyy period: kriminometricheskiy podkhod // Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VShE. - 2001. - № 2. - S. 194-217.

2. Afanaseva O. R., Goncharova M. V., Shiyan V. I. Sostoyanie i tendentsii prestupnosti v obshchestvennykh mestakh // Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. - 2019. - T. 13. - № 6. - S. 895-908. - https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(6).895-908.

3. Badalov V. I., Zhumanazarov B. Ya., Ozeretskovskiy L. B., Grebnev D. G., Golovko K. P., Samokhvalov I. M. Osobennosti sovremennykh ognestrelnykh raneniy mirnogo vremeni v usloviyakh krupnogo goroda // Skoraya meditsinskaya pomoshch. - 2016. - T. 17. - № 2. - S. 49-56.

4. Beketov O. I., Surgutskov V. I. Politseyskoe pravo Rossii: proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. - 2016. - № 8 (69). - S. 59-67. - https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2016.69.8.059-067.

5. Viktorov A. V., Fedorov A. B. «Vseobshchee vooruzhenie naroda»: sotsial-demokraticheskaya ideya i revolyutsionnaya praktika (1917-1918 gody) // Istoriko-pravovye problemy: novyy rakurs. - 2021. - № 4. - S. 78-87. - https://doi.org/10.24412/2309-1592-2021-4-78-87.

6. Dorokhov V. Zh. Spetsialnye sredstva sovetskoy militsii: vyuchennyy urok (1962-1973 gg.) // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2018. - № 3 (86). - S. 16-21.

7. Zadorin I. V., Zotova V. A., Khomyakova A. P. Tsennostnye orientatsii rossiyan v usloviyakh fragmentirovannogo obshchestva // Neformalnaya ekonomika i obshchestvennoe doverie v Rossii: materialy kruglogo stola. Moskva, Gosudarstvennaya Duma RF, 6 iyunya 2019 g. - M., 2020. - S. 66-78.

8. Klevno V. A., Rasnyuk S. V., Vladimirov V. Yu. Ognestrelnoe oruzhie ogranichennogo porazheniya: sudebnomeditsinskie i psikhologicheskie aspekty, ponyatie otnositelnogo psikhologicheskogo ostanavlivayushchego deystviya // Sudebnaya meditsina. - 2019. - № 5 (2). - S. 16-20. - https://doi.org/10.19048/2411-8729-2019-5-2-16-20.

9. Koleganov S. V., Kuvshinov D. L., Pigina S. V., Fedotov A. V., Shchedrov I. Yu. «Bezopasnyy gorod» v regionakh mira: sravnitelnyy analiz s rossiyskoy kontseptsiey // Tekhnologii grazhdanskoy bezopasnosti. - 2021. - T. 18. - № 3 (69). - S. 56-60. - https://doi.org/10.54234/CST.19968493.2021.18.3.69.11.55.

10. Kononov A. M., Eriashvili N. D. K voprosu o vozmozhnosti privatizatsii funktsii publichnoy vlasti v sfere vnutrennikh del // Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnye kadry. - 2020. - № 2. - S. 30-37. - https://doi.org/10.24411/2073-3305-2020-10058.

11. Molyanov A. Yu., Semykin V. V. Spetsialnye sredstva organov vnutrennikh del ili oruzhie neletalnogo deystviya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2011. - № 6. - S. 289-292.

12. Panov S. L. Legalizatsii korotkostvolnogo ognestrelnogo oruzhiya: «za» i «protiv» // Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2006. - № 1 (23). - S. 32-35.

13. Potapov A. I. Rossiyskiy Zakon ob oruzhii // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 1994. - № 2 (4). - S. 12-16.

14. Surgutskov V. I. Pravo grazhdan Rossii na khranenie i noshenie otdelnykh obraztsov letalnogo oruzhiya v tselyakh samooborony (priglashenie k diskussii) // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitelnaya praktika. - 2017. - № 4 (42). - S. 29-36.

15. Trukhan A. P., Samokhvalov I. M., Isakov V. D., Yakovenko O. O., Kuraev P. I. Osobennosti etiologii i kharakteristiki sovremennykh ognestrelnykh raneniy mirnogo vremeni // Vyatskiy meditsinskiy vestnik. - 2020. - № 4 (68). - S. 38-41. - https://doi.org/10.24411/2220-7880-2020-10127.

16. Shustrov D. G. Razdelenie vlastey kak problema teorii i praktiki gosudarstvennoy organizatsii Rossii v praktike rossiyskogo konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya // Sovremennye problemy organizatsii publichnoy vlasti: monografiya / otv. red. S. A. Avakyan. - M.: Yustitsinform, 2014. - 596 s.

17. Alexander J. Future War: Non-Lethal Weapons in Modern Warfare. - New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999. - 256 p.

18. Hoffberger E. Non-Lethal Weapons: The Principle of Proportionality in Armed Conflict and the Right to Health in Law Enforcement // Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci. - 2017. - Vol. 38. - No. 2. - https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.38.2.6.

19. Jiang M. A Brief Prehistory of China’s Social Credit System // Communication and the Public. - 2020. - Vol. 5. - No. 3-4. - P. 93-98. - https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047320959856.