Problems of Improving the Institution of Jurisdiction in Civil Cases
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.080-089
Abstract
The institution of jurisdiction in civil cases has undergone significant changes over the past 20 years with numerous additions been made to it, which indicates a change in the concept of distribution of cases between courts, developed during the preparation of the Civil Procedure Code of the RSFSR in 1964. A complicated judicial system, as well as an increase in the variety of cases submitted to the courts, required new rules establishing the relevance of a particular case to the court. However, as the analysis of the changes that took place showed, the most of the changes were made to resolve current problems beyond any general concept replacing the Soviet one. In order to improve the institution of jurisdiction in civil cases, an integrated approach is needed that will allow us to elucidate the meaning of the norms of jurisdiction at the present stage of the development of civil procedure law; to develop reasonable criteria for the distribution of cases between different courts; to increase safeguards of the interests of persons involved in the case when transferring cases from one court to another; to improve the mechanism for transferring cases; to resolve the question of admissibility and boundaries of the agreement on jurisdiction; to substantiate the criteria of insignificance of cases to determine jurisdiction of Justices of the Peace; to update the grounds for alternative, exclusive jurisdiction.
Keywords
About the Author
M. V. SamsonovaRussian Federation
Maria V. Samsonova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Administrative Proceedure
References
1. Grazhdanskiy protsess: uchebnik / pod red. M. S. Shakaryan. — M.: Yurid. lit., 1993. — 560 s.
2. Grazhdanskiy protsess: uchebnik / otv. red. V. V. Yarkov. — M.: Bek, 1999. — 624 s.
3. Kleynman A. F. Osnovnye voprosy kodifikatsii sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessualnogo prava // Izbrannye trudy. T. 2. — SPb.: Izd. dom R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr», 2009. — 816 s.
4. Osokina G. L. Grazhdanskiy protsess. Obshchaya chast. — M.: Norma, 2008. — 752 s.
5. Shakaryan M. S. Nekotorye novye polozheniya grazhdanskogo protsessualnogo prava po GPK soyuznykh respublik // Izbrannye trudy. — SPb.: Izd. dom R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr», 2014.
6. Shakaryan M. S. Problemy sovershenstvovaniya pravosudiya po grazhdanskim delam i grazhdanskogo protsessualnogo zakonodatelstva v sovremennyy period // Izbrannye trudy. — SPb.: Izd. dom R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr», 2014. — S. 181–200.
7. Shakaryan M. S. Voprosy yuridicheskikh garantiy primeneniya norm grazhdanskogo protsessualnogo prava // Izbrannye trudy. — SPb.: Izd. dom R. Aslanova «Yuridicheskiy tsentr», 2014. — 880 s.
Review
For citations:
Samsonova M.V. Problems of Improving the Institution of Jurisdiction in Civil Cases. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(2):80-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.159.2.080-089