Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Autonomy of Generative AI Digital Platforms in Regulating Relations with Users

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.165.8.066-075

Abstract

The impact of the phenomenon of digital platforms on public relations can be explained, inter alia, by the fact that platform operators are beginning to compete with states for the right to set rules for users, which include almost all participants in civil turnover, inventive and creative industries, consumers of content, etc. Conditional privatization of the regulatory impact on public relations, based on the example of analyzing the rules of generative artificial intelligence platforms for creating various kinds of content, urges the State to respond. With regard to the legal regulation of digital platforms, it seems possible to build such a multi-level system of regulation of public relations that can be based on both general principles of law and codified norms. The developing discussion around the concept of the digital code of the Russian Federation allows us to formulate approaches to identify those areas of relations in the digital environment that are subject to state regulation in regulatory legal acts, as well as those that can be regulated at the level of "soft law" and within the framework of contracts between platform operators and users.

About the Author

Y. S. Kharitonova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Yulia S. Kharitonova, Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor, Head  of the REC "Center for Legal Research of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy;" Professor, Department  of Business Law

Moscow



References

1. Gabov A. V. Tsifrovaya platforma kak novoe pravovoe yavlenie // Permskiy yuridicheskiy almanakh. — 2021. — № 4. — S. 13–82.

2. Kashkin S. Yu., Altukhov A. V. V poiskakh kontseptsii pravovogo regulirovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekta: platformennye pravovye modeli // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2020. — № 4 (68). — S. 26–40.

3. Mazhorina M. V. Tsifrovye platformy i mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo, ili Est li budushchee u kiberprava? // Lex russica. — 2019. — № 2. — S. 107–120.

4. Osnovy platformennogo i ekosistemnogo prava: ucheb. posobie / S. Yu. Kashkin, A. O. Chetverikov, N. A. Pozhilova; otv. red. S. Yu. Kashkin. — M., 2022. — 112 s.

5. Poduzova E. B. Osobennosti statusa «tsifrovykh» subektov: tsivilisticheskiy vzglyad // Khozyaystvo i pravo. — 2021. — № 10. — S. 17–28.

6. Sidorenko E. L. Zashchita prav polzovateley tsifrovykh platform: osnovnye podkhody // Mirovoy sudya. — 2023. — № 1. — S. 21–24.

7. Srnichek N. Kapitalizm platform / per. s angl. M. Dobryakova. — M., 2020. — 125 s.

8. Cohen J. E. Law for the platform economy // UC Davis Law Review. — 2017. — Vol. 51. — P. 133–204.

9. Daugareilh I., Degryse, C., Pochet, P. The platform economy and social law: Key issues in comparative perspective. ETUI Working Paper 2019.10. — 146 p.

10. Delbruck J. Structural changes in the international system and its legal order: international law in the era of globalization // Swiss Review International & European Law. — 2001. — Vol. 1. — P. 1–36.

11. Johnson C. E. Meeting the Ethical Challenges of Leadership. — 2018.

12. Kelton M., Sullivan M., Rogers Z., Bienvenue E., Troath S. Virtual sovereignty? Private internet capital, digital platforms and infrastructural power in the United States // International Affair. — 2022. — Vol. 98 (6). — P. 1977–1999.

13. Kochan D. J. The Political Economy of the Production of Customary International Law: The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in US Courts // Berkeley Journal of International Law. — 2004. — No. 22. — P. 200–240.

14. Koos S. Digital globalization and law // Lex Scientia Law Review. — 2022. — Vol. 6 (1). — P. 33–68.

15. Lobel O. The Law of the Platform // Minnesota Law Review. — 2016. — Vol. 101. — P. 87–166.

16. Parker G. G., Alstyne M. W. V., Choudary S. P. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. — N. Y. ; London, 2016.

17. Pelzer P., Frenken K., Boon W. Institutional entrepreneurship in the platform economy: How Uber tried (and failed) to change the Dutch taxi law // Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. — 2019. — No. 33. — P. 1–12.

18. Robles-Carrillo M. Digital Platforms: A Challenge for States? // Platform Economy: Designing a Supranational Legal Framework. — Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2020. — P. 49–62.

19. Stemler A., Perry J. E., Haugh T. The code of the platform // Georgia Law Review. — 2009. — Vol. 54. — P. 605–662.

20. Weiss E. B. Establishing norms in a kaleidoscopic world. — Brill, 2020. — 544 p.


Review

For citations:


Kharitonova Y.S. Autonomy of Generative AI Digital Platforms in Regulating Relations with Users. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2024;19(8):66-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2024.165.8.066-075

Views: 232


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)