Actualization of Legal Regulation of Moral Harm Compensation Relations in the Context of Systematization of Problems of their Legislative Regulation

The article is devoted to actualization of legal regulation of moral harm compensation relations in the context of systematization of problems of their legislative regulation In order to draw the directions of actualization of the legal regulation of the institute of moral harm compensation, the article examines, summarizes (classifies) some problems of the legal regulation of relations involving moral damage compensation that have been repeatedly discussed and analyzed by domestic civil law scholars, the ways to deal with certain problems have also been examined. Such problems traditionally include: unjustified restriction of the methods of moral harm compensation, lack of a full and adequate definition of moral harm, certain conflicts of terminology, lack of both a complete list of criteria for determining the amount of compensation for moral harm and methods of determining the amount of the compensation for moral harm. Systematization of problems of legal regulation of compensation awarded for moral harm made it possible to justify and isolate individual directions of actualization of the legal regulation of the institution in question: 1) improvement of a conceptual apparatus of the institute of moral harm compensation; 2) improvement of the legal regulation of individualization and differentiation of moral harm compensation; 3) consolidation of methodology for determining the amount of moral harm compensation in legislation.

moral harm, compensation for moral harm, issues of legal regulation, conceptual apparatus problems, individualization of moral harm compensation, criteria for determining the amount of compensation, improvement of the legal regulation, systematization of the problems of legal regulation, actualization of the legal regulation, detailing the concept of the civil society development

1. Воробьев С.М. Альтернативные способы возмещения морального вреда потерпевшим // Актуальные проблемы российского права. - 2013. - № 3. - С. 287-290.

2. Герасина Д.А. Способы защиты деловой репутации // Евразийское научное объединение. - 2015. - № 8 (8). - С. 48-51.

3. Голубев К. И., Нарижний С.В. Компенсация морального вреда как способ защиты неимущественных благ личности. - СПб.: Юридический центр-Пресс, 2001. - 302 с.

4. Ершова Е.В. Применение компенсации морального вреда как выражение компенсационной функции при защите семейных прав // Вестник Тверского государственного университета. - Серия: Право. - 2016. - № 1. - С. 81-89.

5. Малеина М.Н. Система критериев определения компенсации неимущественного вреда как способа защиты гражданских, семейных и трудовых прав граждан // Журнал российского права. - 2015. - № 5 (221). - С. 59-73.

6. Родионов О.В. О некоторых проблемах компенсации морального вреда // Новое слово в науке и практике: гипотезы и апробация результатов исследований. - 2015. - № 18. - С. 181-184.

7. Трофимова Г.А. Моральный вред: сущность, основания возникновения и объем // Законодательство и экономика. - 2016. - № 7. - С. 22-30.