Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

The Legal Nature and Essence of Pilot Judgement Procedure in the European Court of Human Rights

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2017.77.4.156-164

Abstract

This article is devoted to the analysis of the legal nature and essence of the pilot judgments procedure in the European Court of Human Rights. The author explores the views of domestic and foreign scientists on the question of the legal nature, content and other aspects of the essence of the procedure of pilot judgments. The author concludes that initiation of the procedure of the pilot judgment does not cover and does not reflect all violations and related legal problems faced by the claimants, including those caused due to structural problems. The article also discusses the European Court properties acquired due to the application procedure of the pilot judgments, deficiencies in the legal framework of the procedure of pilot judgments and other issues related to the legal content of the considered procedure. The author notes that with the fixation of a pilot judgment mechanism the Court has given itself a new function - the ability to dictate state-defendants specific ways to address the violations of the Convention in the domestic legal system. In the final part of the article it is indicated that there is a need and necessity for further improvement and regulation of standards and provisions that would fully disclose the nature and paradigm of the procedure development.

About the Author

T. D. Oganesyan
Belgorod National Research University; North Caucasus Branch of the Russian State University of Justice
Russian Federation


References

1. Зимненко Б.Л. Решения Европейского Суда по правам человека и правовая система Российской Фе дерации // Государство и право. - 2008. - № 7.

2. Кирилловская Н.Н. Пилотные постановления Европейского Cуда по правам человека в механизме юридической деятельности // Ведомости уголовно-исполнительной системы. - 2015. - № 3 (154).

3. Ковлер А.И. Наш человек в Европе // ЭЖ-юрист. - 2009. - № 3.

4. Коста Ж.П. Выступление Председателя Европейского Суда по правам человека Жан-Поля Коста на торжественном заседании Европейского Суда по правам человека по случаю открытия судебного года // Права человека. Практика Европейского Суда по правам человека. - 2010. - № 2 (47).

5. Пантелеева К.А. Европейский Суд по правам человека: на пороге перемен // Евразийский юридический журнал. - 2012. - № 12.

6. Сухов Э.В. Меры общего характера в решениях Европейского Суда по правам человека и «предел уступчивости» России // Социально-политические науки. - 2012. - № 1.

7. Туманов В.А. Европейский Суд по правам человека. Очерк организации и деятельности. - М., 2001.

8. Buyse A. The Pilot Judgment Procedure at the European Court of Human Rights: Possibilities and Challenges // Greek Law Journal. - 2009. - Vol. 57.

9. Fyrnys M. Expanding Competences by Judicial Lawmaking: The Pilot Judgment Procedure of the European Court of Human Rights // German Law Journal. - 2011. - Vol. 12. - № 5.

10. Garlicki L. Broniowski and After: On the Dual Nature of «Pilot Judgments». - 2007.

11. Nedelcu-Surdescu O. Brief analysis of the operations of the pilot judgment procedure before the European Court of human rights (ECHR) // Journal of European Studies and International Relations. - 1/2010. - Vol. 26.


Review

For citations:


Oganesyan T.D. The Legal Nature and Essence of Pilot Judgement Procedure in the European Court of Human Rights. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2017;(4):156-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2017.77.4.156-164

Views: 498


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)