Procedural Accentuation of the Procedure for Calculating the Period for Challenging Suspicious Transactions, its Law Enforcement Evolution and the Need to Change Legal Regulation
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.172.3.133-148
Abstract
The paper is devoted to legal issues and peculiarities of calculating the period of suspicion in relation to paragraph 2 of Article 61.2 of the Federal Law of 26.10.2002 No. 127-FZ «On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)». Despite the fact that the institution of competitive challenge is a popular subject matter of scientific research and law enforcement improvement, one aspect of the topic remains virtually unaddressed and concerns approaches to calculating the period for challenging the debtor’s transactions. Meanwhile, changing the settings of legal regulation on a seemingly inconspicuous aspect could resolve a number of related problems in the declared area. The author studies the provisions of the Russian Federation legislation, law enforcement features of determining the period for challenging transactions, the historical context, foreign experience, as well as the current practice of the Judicial Collegium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation for economic disputes on the issue raised, identifies a serious imbalance between the legal norm and the practice of its application, and suggests ways to solve the identified problems.
About the Author
A. A. Karpova
Saratov State Law Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Karpova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Lecturer, Department of Arbitrazh Procedure, Advocacy and Notary Services
Saratov
References
1. Golmsten A. Kh. Uchenie o prave kreditora oprovergat yuridicheskie akty, sovershennye dolzhnikom v ego ushcherb, v sovremennoy yuridicheskoy literature / pod red. A. G. Smirnykh. — M., 2019. — 264 s.
2. Grimm D. D. Osparivanie aktov, sovershennykh vo vred kreditoram (po povodu zakonoproekta, vnesennogo v Gosudarstvennuyu Dumu) // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. — 2010. — № 4. — S. 126–191.
3. Kalugin V. Yu. Materialno-pravovye i protsessualnye aspekty zashchity ot konkursnogo osparivaniya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Ekaterinburg, 2024. — 175 s.
4. Karelina S. A. Podozritelnye sdelki v protsesse nesostoyatelnosti (bankrotstva): pravovye problemy osparivaniya // Predprinimatelskoe pravo. — 2012. — № 4. — S. 22–26.
5. Kotsiol Kh. Osnovy i spornye voprosy osparivaniya deystviy dolzhnika, sovershennykh vo vred ego kreditoram (nachalo) // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. — 2017. — T. 17. — № 3. — S. 205–294.
6. Krutiy E. A. Institut vnekonkursnogo osparivaniya sdelok, sovershennykh dolzhnikom v ushcherb interesam kreditorov: istoriya stanovleniya v Rossii // Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2020. — № 2. — S. 26–34.
7. Kuzulgurtova A. Sh. Iskusstvennoe izmenenie perioda podozritelnosti po delam o bankrotstve v praktike Verkhovnogo Suda RF // Vestnik arbitrazhnoy praktiki. — 2021. — № 5. — S. 41–45.
8. Lotfullin R. K. Osparivanie sdelok pri bankrotstve. — M., 2019. — 328 s.
9. Osnovnye polozheniya grazhdanskogo prava: postateynyy kommentariy k statyam 1–16.1 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii / A. V. Asoskov, V. V. Baybak, R. S. Bevzenko [i dr.]; otv. red. A. G. Karapetov. — M.: M-Logos, 2020. — 1469 s.
10. Sviridenko O. M. Osparivanie sdelok vo vred kreditoram vne protsedury bankrotstva (vnekonkursnoe osparivanie) // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2020. — № 15 (2). — S. 105–112.
11. Suvorov E. D. Problemy realizatsii printsipa ravenstva kreditorov nesostoyatelnogo dolzhnika: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2022. — 655 s.
12. Telyukina M. V. Mekhanizm Actio pauliana kak konkursno-pravovoy sposob zashchity interesov kreditorov // Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika, 2014. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/38535188.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 27.05.2024).
13. Usacheva K. A. Vnekonkursnoe osparivanie povedeniya dolzhnika, prichinyayushchego vred ego kreditoram: rossiyskoe pravo i evropeyskaya pravovaya traditsiya // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. — 2017. — № 5. — S. 8–54.
14. Shershenevich G. F. Konkursnoe pravo. — Kazan: Tipografiya Imperatorskogo universiteta, 1898. — 499 s.
15. Shishmareva T. P. Nedeystvitelnost sdelok i deystviy v prot1sedurakh nesostoyatelnosti v Rossii i Germanii. — M.: Statut, 2018. — 239 s.
16. Restructuring & Insolvency. Getting the Deal Through / by B. Leonard. — 2017. — 406 p.
17. Wood P. R. Principles of International Insolvency. Part 2. — London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2007.
Review
For citations:
Karpova A.A. Procedural Accentuation of the Procedure for Calculating the Period for Challenging Suspicious Transactions, its Law Enforcement Evolution and the Need to Change Legal Regulation. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(3):133-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.172.3.133-148
Views:
60
Email this article 