Buffer Zones of World Natural Heritage Sites in Russian and Foreign Practice
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.171.2.134-145
Abstract
The paper analyzes international legal structure of the buffer zone and covers the use of buffer zones in various types of human activities. The different functional orientations of buffer zones are noted, united by their common purpose — smoothing out social conflicts. The genesis of this phenomenon in the international regulatory system and national legal orders is considered, and the special role of the experience of creating buffer zones in the system of biosphere reserves is shown. The legal framework governing the buffer zone regime in the Guidelines for the Implementation of the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage has been subjected to a detailed analysis. The foreign practice of creating buffer zones at world natural heritage sites is studied, and the diversity of their spatial configuration and functional orientation is shown. The features of creating buffer zones of World Natural Heritage sites in Russia are analyzed. Various options for implementing the recommendation of the monitoring mission of the World Heritage Centre and the International Union for Conservation of Nature to create a buffer zone of Lake Baikal as a World Heritage Site are shown.
Keywords
About the Author
R. Yu. KolobovRussian Federation
Roman Yu. Kolobov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Laboratory of Legal Research of High-Tech Industries, Irkutsk Institute of Chemistry named after A.E. Favorsky; Associate Professor, Department of International Law and Comparative Law, Law Institute, Irkutsk State University
Irkutsk
References
1. Affolder N. A. The Private Life of Environmental Treaties // The American Journal of International Law. — 2009. — Vol. 103. — No. 3. — P. 510–525.
2. DeBoer W. Buffer Zones in the Cultural Ecology of Aboriginal Amazonia: An Ethnohistorical Approach // American Antiquity. — 1981. — Vol. 46. — No. 2. — P. 364–377.
3. Dye B. J. Dam building by the illiberal modernisers: ideological drivers for Rwanda and Tanzania’s megawatt mission // Critical African Studies. — 2022. — Vol. 14. — No. 3. — P. 231–249.
4. Heinen J. T., Mehta J. N. Emerging Issues in Legal and Procedural Aspects of Buffer Zone Management with Case Studies from Nepal // The Journal of Environment & Development. — 2000. — Vol. 9. — No. 1. — P. 45–67.
5. Katz E. Between Here and There: Buffer Zones in International Law // University of Chicago Law. — 2017. — Vol. 84. — No. 3. — P. 1379–1423.
6. Köck G., Arnberger A. The Austrian Biosphere Reserves in the light of changing MAB strategies // Management and Policy Issues. — 2017. — Vol. 9. — P. 85–92.
7. Maysyuk E. Energy Sector of the Baikal Natural Territory in Terms of Impact Assessment on the Ecosystem of Lake Baikal // International Scientific Journal «Industry 4.0». — 2019. — No. 5. — P. 228–231.
8. Mumcu C., Fried G., Liu D. Buffer Zone: Policies, Procedures, and Reality // Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport. — 2019. — Vol. 29. — No. 1. — P. 86–101.
9. Price M. F. People in biosphere reserves: An evolving concept // Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal. — 1996. — Vol. 9. — No. 6. — P. 645–654.
10. Robinson M., Maglaras L., Jones K., Janicke H. Protecting Civilians from Cyber Warfare with Cyber Buffer Zones // International Journal of Smart Security Technologies. — 2019. — Vol. 6. — No. 1. — P. 31–48.
11. Shafer C. US National Park Buffer Zones: Historical, Scientific, Social, and Legal Aspects // Environmental Management. — 1999. — Vol. 23. — No. 1. — P. 49–73.
12. Shelford V. Nature Sanctuaries — A Means of Saving Natural Biotic Communities // Science. — 1933. — Vol. 77. — No. 1994. — P. 281–282.
Review
For citations:
Kolobov R.Yu. Buffer Zones of World Natural Heritage Sites in Russian and Foreign Practice. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(2):134-145. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.171.2.134-145