Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Secrecy, Confidential Information, and Confidentiality in the Context of Protecting Information about the Private Life of Participants in Criminal Proceedings

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.180.11.081-090

Abstract

   The paper presents the author’s position regarding defining the content and interrelation of the categories «secret», «confidential information», and «confidentiality», and regarding assessing, on that basis, the adequacy of their usage in scholarly literature with respect to protecting information about the private life of participants in criminal proceedings. The views of scholars who treat the notion of «confidential information» as definitive for the concept of «secret» are critically evaluated. The author argues for the partial compatibility of these concepts, since, in the author’s view, not every secret is confidential, nor does every piece of confidential information constitute a secret. It is contended that scholars are mistaken to link the protection of the inviolability of participants’ private life in the criminal process to the institutions of investigative secrecy and the secrecy of judges’ deliberations. The article concludes that, within the institution of attorney-client confidentiality, the term «confidential» encompasses all information received by the defense counsel from their client, and such confidentiality is necessarily connected with the protection of the client’s private life.

About the Author

S. V. Kornakova
Baikal State University
Russian Federation

Svetlana V. Kornakova, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor

Institute of State Law and National Security; Department of the Theory and
History of Law

Irkutsk



References

1. Avdeeva M. V., Pidzhakov A. Yu. «Tayna» kak pravovoe ponyatie // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. — 2012. — № 4. — S. 137–143.

2. Balashkina I. V. Osobennosti konstitutsionnogo regulirovaniya prava na neprikosnovennost chastnoy zhizni v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Pravo i politika. — 2007. — № 7. — S. 92–105.

3. Govenko Yu. A. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana tayny chastnogo kharaktera : avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.08. — Krasnodar, 2011. — 26 s.

4. Gorodov O. A. Informatsionnoe pravo: uchebnik. — M.: Prospekt, 2008. — 242 s.

5. Dal V. I. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka. Sovremennaya versiya. — M.: Eksmo, 2006. — 736 s.

6. Evseenko V. E. Tayna v dosudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo protsessa : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.09. — Krasnodar, 2016. — 183 s.

7. Zharova A. K., Elin V. M. Istochniki ponyatiy «personalnye dannye» i «chastnaya zhizn litsa» v rossiyskom prave // Vestnik Akademii prava i upravleniya. — 2017. — № 1 (46). — S. 69–78.

8. Korshunov I. G. O problemakh reformirovaniya prokurorskogo nadzora v sovremennyy period // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2013. — T. 1. — № 4. — S. 293–296.

9. Kratkiy slovar inostrannykh slov / avt.-sost. E. A. Grishina. — M.: Astrel; AST, 2002. — 640 s.

10. Lavrushko E. A. Problemy zakonodatelnogo regulirovaniya obespecheniya konfidentsialnosti v ugolovnom protsesse // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika. — 2024. — № 20 (2). — S. 88–94.

11. Mishchenko E. V., Lavrushko E. A. Pravovye osobennosti realizatsii printsipov ugolovnogo protsessa, obespechivayushchikh konfidentsialnost i neprikosnovennost chastnoy zhizni ego uchastnikov // Rossiyskiy sledovatel. — 2024. — № 6. — S. 10–14.

12. Mollo F.-E. Pravila advokatskoy professii vo Frantsii. — M.: Izd. N. P. Shubinskogo, 1894. — 98 s.

13. Osipova M. A. Glasnost pravosudiya: otkrytoe i zakrytoe sudebnoe razbiratelstvo v ugolovnom protsesse // Grazhdanin i pravo. — 2010. — № 3. — S. 77–86.

14. Permyakov M. V. Kategoriya «tayna» v sisteme pravovogo regulirovaniya : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk : 12.00.01. — Ekaterinburg, 2006. — 235 s.

15. Ryzhakov A. P. Zashchitnik v ugolovnom protsesse. — 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M.: Delo i servis, 2017. — 336 s.

16. Smolkova I. V. Aktualnoe issledovanie problem okhranyaemoy federalnym zakonom tayny na dosudebnom proizvodstve // Akademicheskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. — 2016. — № 4 (66). — S. 55–60.

17. Smolkova I. V. Aktualnye problemy okhranyaemykh federalnym zakonom tayn v rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. — M.: Yurlitinform, 2014. — 352 s.

18. Smolkova I. V. Tayna soveshchaniya sudey kak garantiya zakonnosti, obosnovannosti i spravedlivosti prigovora // Sibirskie ugolovno-protsessualnye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya. — 2017. — № 2 (16). — S. 116–122.

19. Smolkova I. V., Dunaeva M. S. Osnovaniya vmeshatelstva pravookhranitelnykh organov i suda v chastnuyu zhizn grazhdan: ugolovno-protsessualnyy aspekt // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal Baykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava. — 2014. — № 3. — S. 184–192.


Review

For citations:


Kornakova S.V. Secrecy, Confidential Information, and Confidentiality in the Context of Protecting Information about the Private Life of Participants in Criminal Proceedings. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(11):81-90. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.180.11.081-090

Views: 161

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)