Technolabor: Addressing the Question of Directions for the Development of Labor Relations in the Context of Advancing Artificial Intelligence Systems and Production Robotization
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.181.12.090-101
Abstract
The paper is devoted to new trends in the development of labor relations in the context of the spread of artificial intelligence systems and robotization of production in Russia. The authors highlight the concept of technolabor as a key area, namely a form of work in which workers perform tasks in close collaboration with digital and autonomous technologies, including neural network platforms and robotic systems. Particular attention is given to the analysis of the legal consequences of such interaction, innovations in labor legislation and changes in the substance of the employee’s labor function. It is argued that the integration of artificial intelligence and robotic systems leads to a blurring of the characteristic of personal performance of a work function and to a transformation of employee responsibilities, including the need to formulate a task, monitor and adjust the result, as well as possess specific digital competencies. The authors highlight the risks of legal liability for workers when using neural networks due to the unpredictability of results and possible errors («hallucinations» of neural networks). The social effects of the introduction of technolabor are considered, including possible reductions in wages and working hours, as well as the problems of fair distribution of the benefits of robotics between employers and employees. This paper analyzes the procedural and legal aspects of changes to employment contracts initiated by employers during technological modernization under Article 74 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. It emphasizes the need for further refinement of the regulatory framework and legal mechanisms for employee protection.
Keywords
About the Authors
N. V. ChernykhNadezhda V. Chernykh, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Labor Law and Social Security Law
Moscow
D. V. Vorontsov
Dmitry I. Vorontsov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Labor Law and Social Security Law
Moscow
References
1. Alekseev A. ChatGPT ustanovil pravilnyy diagnoz rebenku iz SShA, kogda vrachi okazalis bessilny // URL: https://www.gazeta.ru/social/news/2023/09/15/21293720.shtml (data obrashcheniya: 18.08.2025).
2. Akhmedov A. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i falshivye pretsedenty: regulyatornoe reshenie Vysokogo suda Anglii // URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2025/06/09/iskusstvennyj_intellekt_i_falshivye_precedenty_regulyatornoe_ reshenie_vysokogo_suda_anglii (data obrashcheniya: 15.08.2025).
3. Baeva L. V., Pereverzev I. K. Ot tsifrovoy diskriminatsii k tsifrovomu shovinizmu: kak tekhnologii podcherkivayut ili stirayut sotsialnye granitsy // Caspium Securitatis: zhurnal kaspiyskoy bezopasnosti. — 2025. — T. 5. — № 1. — S. 31–47.
4. Blagodir A. L. Materialnaya otvetstvennost rabotnika za vred, prichinennyy pri ispolzovanii iskusstvennogo intellekta // II Yaroslavskiy yuridicheskiy forum: sbornik nauchnykh statey po voprosam trudovogo prava (30 sentyabrya — 1 oktyabrya 2022 g.) / otv. red. A. M. Lushnikov; YarGU imeni P.G. Demidova. — Yaroslavl: Filigran, 2023. — S. 60–67.
5. Valetskaya T. I., Pleshchenko E. A. Vliyanie iskusstvennogo intellekta na rynok truda // Uchenye zapiski Altayskogo filiala Rossiyskoy akademii narodnogo khozyaystva i gosudarstvennoy sluzhby pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii. — 2024. — № 1 (24). — S. 36–39.
6. Gadzhiev G. A., Voynikanis E. A. Mozhet li robot byt subektom prava (poisk pravovykh form dlya regulirovaniya tsifrovoy ekonomiki)? // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. — 2018. — № 4. — S. 24–48.
7. Kostarnova N. II zovut v onkologiyu // URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/7972830 (data obrashcheniya: 18.08.2025).
8. Lushnikov A. M. Tsifrovizatsiya trudovogo prava i trudovye otnosheniya // Zakon. — 2022. — № 10. — S. 28–37.
9. Surabekyants S. Dlitelnaya rabota s II-instrumentami oslablyaet u lyudey kognitivnye sposobnosti, vyyasnili uchenye // URL: https://3dnews.ru/1124715/dlitelnaya-rabota-s-iiinstrumentami-oslablyaet-kognitivniesposobnosti-viyasnili-uchyonie (data obrashcheniya: 18.08.2025).
10. Tatarenko L. A., Mulenkov S. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie raspredeleniya otvetstvennosti za oshibki iskusstvennogo intellekta v meditsine // Aktualnye problemy upravleniya zdorovem naseleniya: sbornik nauchnykh trudov VIII Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. — N. Novgorod, 2025. — S. 249–253.
11. Filipova I. A. Iskusstvennyy intellekt, trudovye otnosheniya i pravo: vliyanie i vzaimodeystvie // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2019. — № 11. — S. 69–77.
12. Shoniya G. V. Privlechenie k distsiplinarnoy otvetstvennosti meditsinskikh rabotnikov: aktualnye problemy v svete vnedreniya tsifrovykh tekhnologiy v meditsinskuyu deyatelnost // Lex russica (Russkiy zakon). — 2023. — T. 76. — № 10 (203). — S. 36–44.
13. McCoy J. South Korea’s Breakthrough: How Robots Replace Workers in The World’s Most Automated Nation // URL: www.Firstmovers.ai (data obrashcheniya: 23.08.2025).
Review
For citations:
Chernykh N.V., Vorontsov D.V. Technolabor: Addressing the Question of Directions for the Development of Labor Relations in the Context of Advancing Artificial Intelligence Systems and Production Robotization. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(12):90-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.181.12.090-101
JATS XML




















