Control over the Execution of Delegated Federal Executive Authority Powers by Non-Governmental Organizations and Accountability for their Improper Execution

The paper examines the specifics of government oversight over how commercial and non-profit organizations carry out authoritative powers delegated to them by federal executive authorities, as well as the legal liability these organizations may incur for improper performance. The relevance of the topic stems from the growing practice of involving non-governmental entities in the implementation of public functions, while maintaining safeguards to protect the rights of citizens and the lawful interests of legal entities participating in civil commerce. The study explores both external and internal forms of control, as well as the structure of property, administrative, and disciplinary liability applicable to implementing organizations. A separate section of the study focuses on delineating the powers of federal executive authorities in organizing and ensuring the execution of delegated functions, against their authority to verify compliance with mandatory requirements, respond to violations, and review decisions adopted by non-governmental actors. The paper concludes that oversight in this area has a multilevel structure and that organizations vested with authoritative powers are subject to a complex, multifaceted system of liability.

1. Gatsolati V. E., Gatsolaeva A. Kh. Prozrachnost gosudarstvennoy finansovoy podderzhki organizatsiy grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Rossii // Administrativnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2022. — № 3. — S. 47– 68. — DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2022.3.38558.

2. Gorlova E. N. Finansovaya pravosubektnost gosudarstvennykh uchrezhdeniy // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2023. — № 7 (107). — S. 37–46. — DOI: 10.17803/2311-5998.2023.107.7.037-046.

3. Zubarev S. M. Imeet li mesto administrativnoe prinuzhdenie pri osushchestvlenii kontrolya, kvazikontrolya i nadzora v sfere gosudarstvennogo upravleniya? // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2021. — № 6 (82). — S. 23–32.

4. Kolmakova K. A. Pravovoy status gosudarstvennogo byudzhetnogo uchrezhdeniya Voronezhskoy oblasti «Tsentr gosudarstvennoy kadastrovoy otsenki Voronezhskoy oblasti» // Administrativnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo. — 2022. — № 1. — S. 16–27.

5. Kolpakova Yu. I. Tsifrovizatsiya v deyatelnosti administrativnykh komissiy munitsipalnykh obrazovaniy // Rossiysko-aziatskiy pravovoy zhurnal. — 2021. — № 4. — S. 28–34.

6. Koshcheev V. A., Koshcheev M. V. Rezultaty i perspektivy funktsionirovaniya instituta samoregulirovaniya v stroitelstve // Moskovskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. — 2023. — № 5. — S. 397–411. — DOI: 10.55186/2413046X_2023_8_5_198.

7. Mayorov V. I. O delegirovanii publichnykh funktsiy v oblasti obespecheniya bezopasnosti dorozhnogo dvizheniya negosudarstvennym subektam // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn. — 2023. — № 2. — S. 115–122. — DOI: 10.24412/1608-8794-2023-2-115-122.

8. Petrova E. S., Kot M. K. Pravovye formy delegirovaniya gosudarstvom svoikh funktsiy subektam chastnogo prava v protsesse nesostoyatelnosti (bankrotstva) // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. — 2023. — № 11. — S. 294–300. — DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2023.11.38.