Informed Voluntary Consent for Medical Intervention in the Russian Federation, the USA and Germany

The paper aims to identify systemic problems in Russian legal regulation related to obtaining informed voluntary consent of a patient for medical intervention, and developing proposals for their solution using the experience of the United States of America and the Federal Republic of Germany. This study argues that informed voluntary consent is of a civil-law nature, constituting a unilateral personal expression of the patient’s will. While it exhibits the characteristics of a transaction as defined in Article 153 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, it is subject to the restriction provided for in paragraph 4 of Article 182 of the same Code, which excludes from the scope of agency actions that are closely connected with the person. The study identifies several systemic problems in the Russian regulatory framework: the excessively general character of the information disclosure standard set forth in Article 20 of the Federal Law «On the Fundamentals of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation»; the lack of comprehensive requirements for the content of consent in the context of fee-based medical services and services provided beyond clinical recommendations; and the insufficiency of regulation concerning the strictly personal nature of consent, particularly in legal the absence of a mechanism for advance directives in cases where the patient may subsequently be unable to express his or her will. As a proposed solution, the author advocates for the adoption of the German model of a detailed disclosure standard, which comprises a specific list of mandatory elements to be disclosed and shifts the burden of proof concerning compliance with this obligation to the benefit of the patient. The need to introduce the institution of sick leave orders into Russian law is substantiated. 

1. Afanaseva E. G. Pravo na informirovannoe dobrovolnoe soglasie kak osnova yuridicheskogo statusa patsienta // Sovremennoe meditsinskoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. — M.: INION RAN, 2003. — S. 134–155.

2. Boyarinova V. I. Pravovaya priroda informirovannogo dobrovolnogo soglasiya na meditsinskoe vmeshatelstvo // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo». — 2019. — T. 16. — № 4. — S. 115–124.

3. Brezgulevskaya L. K. Problema soglasiya na sovershenie sdelok v svete reformy grazhdanskogo zakonodatelstva // Zakon. — 2014. — № 9. — S. 156–165.

4. Vakulina G. A. Prava patsientov po dogovoru vozmezdnogo okazaniya meditsinskikh uslug // Meditsinskoe pravo. — 2021. — № 5. — S. 24–29.

5. Gorovenko S. V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost za narushenie trebovaniy zakonodatelstva o poluchenii informirovannogo dobrovolnogo soglasiya na meditsinskoe vmeshatelstvo // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitelnaya praktika. — 2019. — № 2 (48). — S. 43–48.

6. Grebenshchikova E. G., Chuchalin A. G. Uvazhaya avtonomiyu patsienta: dobrovolnoe informirovannoe soglasie v sovremennoy meditsine // Meditsinskaya etika. — 2021. — T. 9. — № 1. — S. 12–16.

7. Krasavchikov O. A. Yuridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. — M.: Gosyurizdat, 1958. — 183 s.

8. Meditsinskoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik / T. V. Klimenko, A. A. Mokhov, A. V. Pekshev [i dr.]; otv. red. A. A. Mokhov. — M.: Prospekt, 2021. — 544 s.

9. Nazarova N. A., Kalyuzhnyy E. A., Shaburova E. V. Pravovoe regulirovanie otnosheniy po informirovannomu dobrovolnomu soglasiyu patsienta na meditsinskoe vmeshatelstvo // Aktualnye problemy sovremennogo prava. — 2023. — № 3 (55). — S. 137–152.

10. Ostanina E. A. Institut patronazha v rossiyskom zakonodatelstve i v reformirovannom nemetskom zakonodatelstve: sravnitelno-pravovoe issledovanie // Zakon. — 2023. — № 4. — S. 188–203.

11. Ostanina E. A. Mozhet li dobrovolnoe informirovannoe soglasie byt dano cherez predstavitelya? // Zakon. — 2020. — № 7. — S. 57–67.

12. Rusanov K. I. Informirovannoe dobrovolnoe soglasie na meditsinskoe vmeshatelstvo: poisk balansa interesov vracha i patsienta // Vestnik Uralskogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava. — 2019. — № 4. — S. 97–101.

13. Starchenko A. A. Massovoe narushenie prav patsientov na dobrovolnoe informirovannoe soglasie i vybor varianta meditsinskogo vmeshatelstva v onkologii // Meditsinskoe pravo: teoriya i praktika. — 2021. — T. 7. — № 2 (14). — S. 87–96.

14. Stepkin S. P. Problemy primeneniya meditsinskoy doverennosti // Pravo i ekonomika. — 2018. — № 5. — S. 22–25.

15. Tikhomirov A. V. Teoriya meditsinskoy uslugi i meditsinskogo delikta: uchebno-nauchnoe posobie. — M.: YurInfoZdrav, 2012. — 112 s.

16. Ulyanova M. V. Dobrovolnoe informirovannoe soglasie nesovershennoletnego // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. — 2023. — № 8. — S. 65–70.

17. Khomutova N. N., Zelenskaya T. M. Informirovannoe dobrovolnoe soglasie patsienta: institualizatsiya praktik v sovremennoy Rossii // Logos et Praxis. — 2023. — T. 22. — № 4. — S. 170–179.

18. Raper S. E., Clapp J. T., Fleisher L. A. Let’s Be Reasonable: Surgical Informed Consent in the COVID 19 Era // Annals of Surgery Open. — 2020. — Vol. 1. — № 2. — e016. — URL: https://journals.lww.com/aosopen/fulltext/2020/12000/let_s_be_reasonable__surgical_informed_consent_in.11.aspx.

19. Wilson R. F. The Promise of Informed Consent // The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Healthcare Law / ed. by I. G. Cohen, A. K. Hoffman, W. M. Sage. — Oxford: Oxford University Press. — 2016. — P. 213–239.