New in the Conceptual Framework of Social Security Law and its Impact on the Field in Question

Abstract

The article examines the two vectors of new trends in the conceptual framework of social security law based on the approach that defines the interrelationship of conceptual and field subject to legal regulation. One vector of the novelties is unwarranted borrowing terms and concepts of civil law, the application of contract forms without specifying its socially constructed field specifics. This leads to unjustified acceptance of private law in regulation of relations on social security. Under the interim socio-relationship agreement is used as a tool for determining the level of social services provided to citizens free of charge. There are no objective reasons for a broader understanding of sectoral subject and enshrining private law elements therein. Relationships, beyond the public law, should be communicated not with the subject of social security law, but with the sphere of social protection. The subject area of the social protection system can include both governmental and private components. The other vector of novelties is codification of new terms and concepts that are not consistent with legal definitions and terminology. Consequently, vertical (hierarchical) and horizontal (peer) relationships in the framework of sectoral conceptual row are violated. Key industry terms and concepts serve as indicators of the domain of legal regulation. The formation of integrated paradigm allows you to define more precisely the range of social relations, which are the subject of the social security law.