Constitutional Complaint in the System of Human Rights Protection in Russia
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2017.85.12.171-178
Abstract
The article analyzes the institute of a constitutional complaint as a means of protecting human rights and freedoms. The author considers essential features of this institution taking into account the standpoint of domestic and foreign researchers on the nature of a constitutional complaint, its types and key features. The author analyses the enshrinement of a constitutional complaint into the Russian legislation, as well as compares the foreign experience, including French, of the application of the institute. The development trends and upgradeability of the competence of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation at the present stage of development are noted. The author proposes changes to the current legislation of the Russian Federation in order to strengthen and enhance the effectiveness of the activities of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and, in particular, in order to increase the level of protection of the human rights and freedoms.
References
1. Блохин П. Конституционная жалоба в Республике Словении с точки зрения проблемы доступа к пра восудию // Сравнительное конституционное обозрение. - 2014. - № 1 (98).
2. Доронина О. Н. Механизм государственной защиты конституционных прав и свобод граждан в Рос сийской Федерации: проблемы развития // Право и гражданское общество в современной России : сб. науч. трудов. - М., 2003.
3. Кряжков В. А. Российская модель конституционной жалобы // Конституционное и муниципальное право. - 2012. - № 5.
4. Николаева Т. А. Обращения граждан в органы конституционной юстиции Российской Федерации и зарубежных стран: конституционно-правовой анализ : автореф. дис.. канд. юрид. наук. - М., 2008.
5. Римское частное право : учебник / под ред. И. Б. Новицкого и И. С. Перетерского. - М. : Юриспруденция, 1999.
6. Aaken A. van. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions : Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Bonn 2005/16. - Bonn, 2005. - P. 14.
7. Ben Achour R. Le controle de la constitutionnalite des lois: quelle procedure? Actes du colloque international «L'effectivite des droits fondamentaux dans les pays de la communaute francophone». Port-Louis (Tle Maurice), 29-30 septembre, 1er octobre 1993. P. 401 // URL: http://www.bibliotheque.refer.org/livre59/ l5905 pdf
8. Favoreu L. Les cours constitutionnelles. - Paris : PUF, 1992.
9. Hurley F. G., Menzies C. Plaintiffs take a one-two punch: Proposition 64 and the Class Action Reform Act dull the teeth of favorite litigation weapons // Previews. - 2005. - March. - P. 412.
10. Schwelb E. The Actio Popularis and International Law // 2 Israel Yearbook Hum Rts 47 (1972).
11. Study on individual access to constitutional justice. - 2011. - November 27. - No. 538/2009 // URL: http:// www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2010)039rev-e.
Review
For citations:
Petina M.M. Constitutional Complaint in the System of Human Rights Protection in Russia. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2017;(12):171-178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2017.85.12.171-178
Views:
708
Email this article 