Notification of Participants of the Proceedings at the Pre-Trial Stages: Guarantees are to be Strengthened

The paper deals with the topical issue of increasing the effectiveness of guarantees of notification in criminal proceedings at the pre-trial stages, including notification by means of introduction of new procedural means used to notify participants of criminal proceedings using information technologies. Notification in criminal proceedings does not fulfill the function of ensuring the effective implementation of the rights and legitimate interests of participants who are not notified of all necessary proceedings and their opportunities, or are notified formally, or contrary to the law, are not notified at all. One of the reasons for this is the weakness of the guarantees of notification in criminal proceedings and the very narrow understanding of the nature of such proceedings. The system of methods of scientific cognition is used to reach the objectives set in this study. The author relied on the method of materialistic dialectics (the problem of notification is investigated as the one taking into account the general procedural problems, the purpose of criminal proceedings, its principles, rights and obligations of participants of criminal proceedings, procedural guarantees), general scientific methods: historical, logical, sociological, as well as private scientific methods of research: formal-legal, systematic-legal, logical-legal.  

notification, rights, institution of notification, right to information, information technologies, principles of criminal proceedings, problems of notification, protection of rights and freedoms of a man and citizen in criminal proceedings, information, material of verification

1. Baxin V. P., Karpov N. S. Problemy sootnosheniya prav lichnosti i metodov borby s prestupnostyu // 50 let v kriminalistike. K 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya R. S. Belkina : materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii. — Voronezh, 2002. — S. 300—311.

2. Vlasova S. V. K voprosu o prisposablivanii ugolovno-processualnogo mexanizma k cifrovoj realnosti // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyj zhurnal. — 2018. — № 1. — S. 13—20.

3. Gavrilin Yu. V., Pobedkin A. V. Sobiranie dokazatelstv v vide svedenij na elektronnyx nositelyax v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii: neobxodimo sovershenstvovanie processualnoj formy // Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii. — 2018. — № 3. — S. 106—114.

4. Grigorev V. N., Pobedkin A. V., Yashin V. N. Ugolovnyj process : uchebnik. — M., 2008. — 816 s.

5. Golovko L. V. Cifrovizaciya v ugolovnom processe: lokalnaya optimizaciya ili globalnaya revolyuciya? // Vestnik ekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti. — 2019. — № 1. — S. 15—25.

6. Kozak D. Sud v sovremennom mire: problemy i perspektivy // Ros. yusticiya. — 2001. — № 9. — S. 4—9.

7. Kuczova E. F. Garantii prav lichnosti v sovetskom ugolovnom processe. — M., 1972. — 115 s.

8. Lenin V. I. Pol. sobr. soch. — T. 43. — 561 s.

9. Martynchik E. G. Subektivnye prava obvinyaemogo i processualnye garantii // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo

10. i pravo. — 1976. — № 7. — S. 90—96.

11. Pobedkin A. V. Kak oduxotvorit Ugolovno-processualnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii? // Vestnik ekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti. — 2016. — № 5. — S. 49—54.

12. Polyakov M. P. Ugolovno-processualnaya interpretaciya rezultatov operativno-rozysknoj deyatelnosti: monografiya / pod nauch. red. prof. V. T. Tomina. — N. Novgorod : Nizhegorod. pravovaya akademiya, 2001. — 278 s.