The Schumpeterian Workfare State in Political and Legal Studies Devoted to the Modern State

The paper investigates one of the possible models of the modern state, namely: the Schumpeterian Workfare State, on the basis of the analysis of scientific literature. The author gives an assessment of the phenomena that determined the transition to a new production and technical paradigm of Post-Fordism. The paper elucidates the preconditions of formation of the idea of the Schumpeterian Workfare State and its essential characteristics.

In particular, it is noted that the model of the Schumpeterian Workfare State is applicable to any capitalist states at the present stage regardless of whether they have passed the stage of Fordism. The author proposes his own definition of the category of the Schumpeterian Workfare State that was missing in the modern domestic theory of the state. The author poses a number of problems that we must resolve for theoretical understanding and practical application of the model of the Schumpeterian Workfare State. To this end, the author believes that it is necessary to update the doctrine about the state in the national science to create solid theoretical foundations for the development and functioning of the Russian Federation at the modern stage.

1. Zorgner A. Avtomatizaciya rabochih mest: ugroza dlya zanyatosti ili istochnik predprinimatel'skih vozmozhnostej? // Forsajt. — 2017. — № 3. — S. 37—48.

2. Lenin V. I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij : v 55 t. — M. : Politizdat, 1974. — T. 42. — 607 s.

3. Lyublinskij V. V. Social'naya politika v stranah Zapada teryaet privlekatel'nost' dlya Rossii? // Vlast'. — 2016. — T. 24. — № 7. — S. 206—213.

4. Tavokin E. P. K voprosu o koncepcii social'nogo gosudarstva // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. — 2015. — № 9. — S. 125—134.

5. Habrieva T. Ya., Chirkin V. E. Teoriya sovremennoj konstitucii. — M. : Norma, 2005. — 319 s.

6. Harin A. N. Korporaciya-gosudarstvo kak al'ternativa sovremennomu gosudarstvu // Vlast'. — 2012. — № 9. — S. 76—79.

7. Shevchuk A. V. Postfordistskie koncepcii kak issledovatel'skaya programma // Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya. — 2002. — № 2. — S. 44—61.

8. Shumpeter J. A. Kapitalizm, socializm i demokratiya : per. s angl. / predisl. i obshch. red. V. S. Avtonomova. — M. : Ekonomika, 1995. — 540 s.

9. Activation or Workfare? Governance and the Neo-Liberal Convergence / ed. by I. Lodemel, A. Moreira. — N.Y. : Oxford University Press, 2014. — 367 p.

10. Dingeldey I. Welfare State Transformation between 'Workfare' and an 'Enabling' State. A Comparative Analysis // TranState Working Papers. — № 21. — Bremen, 2005. — 40 p.

11. Hayrynen S. A centralised market orientation: the implicit determinants of Finnish cultural policy in 1990— 2010 // International Journal of Cultural Policy. — 2013. — 19:5. — Pp. 623—640.

12. Jessop B. The Future of the Capitalist State. — Cambridge : Polity, 2002. — 330 p.

13. Jessop B. Post-Fordism and the State // Comparative Welfare Systems / B. Greve (ed). — London : Palgrave Macmillan, 1996. — R. 165—184.

14. Pierson C. The modern state. — 2nd ed. — London : Routledge, 2004. — 206 p.