Parties Involved in Civil and Arbitrazh Procedural Relations with the Prosecutor’s Participation
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.110.1.168-178
Abstract
In the Soviet period of the development of the prosecutorial activity science, individual authors substantiated ideas about legal relations with the participation of the prosecutor, which have not been developed in modern science. The current active development of the science of prosecutorial activity necessitates focusing on such categories as the structure and content of legal relations with the participation of the prosecutor, their research and substantiation of the provisions on which the further study could be based. The paper presents the results of a study of civil and arbitrazh procedural legal relations with the participation of the prosecutor in terms of the subject elements. The conclusion on the determination of the prosecutor (but not the prosecutor’s body) by one of the subjects of the main civil and arbitrazh procedural legal relations is justified. The participants of the indicated procedural legal relations and their roles are determined. Based on the study, it was concluded that the civil and arbitrazh procedural legal relations involving a prosecutor are bilateral.
About the Author
I. I. Golovko
St. Petersburg Law Institute (Branch) of the University of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina I. Golovko – Cand. Sci. (Law), Docent, Associate Professor of the Department of Prosecutorial Supervision and Participation of the Prosecutor in the Consideration of Criminal, Civil and Commercial Court Cases
Liteynyy pr-t., d. 44, St. Petersburg, 191104
References
1. Aleksandrov N. G. Trudovoe pravootnoshenie : monografiya. — M. : Yuridicheskoe izdatel’stvo ministerstva yusticii SSSR, 1948. — 339 s.
2. Amirbekov K. I. Pravoobespechitel’naya yuridicheskaya deyatel’nost’: problemy teorii i praktiki : dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. — Rostov n/D, 2006. — 441 s.
3. Vaneeva L. A. Grazhdanskie processual’nye pravootnosheniya : uchebnoe posobie. — Vladivostok : Izd-vo Dal’nevost. un-ta, 1974. — 40 s.
4. Vas’kovskij E. V. Kurs grazhdanskogo processa. — M. : izdanie br. Bashmakovyh, 1913. — T. 1. — 701 s.
5. Vikut M. A., Zajcev I. M. Grazhdanskij process Rossii. — M. : Yurist", 1999. — 384 s.
6. Gurvich M. A. Struktura i dvizhenie grazhdanskogo processual’nogo pravootnosheniya // Trudy VYuZI : Voprosy nauki grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava. —1975. — T. 38. — S. 3—34.
7. Dudin A. P. Dialektika pravootnoshenij. — Saratov : Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 1983. — 121 s.
8. Zheruolis A. A. Sushchnost’ sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processa. — Vil’nyus : Mintis, 1969. — 205 s.
9. Zubovich M. M., Zubovich E. M. O strukture grazhdanskih (arbitrazhnyh) processual’nyh pravootnoshenij // Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik. — 2005. — № 1. — S. 31—34.
10. Zyryanov S. M. Administrativno-nadzornye pravootnosheniya: soderzhanie i razvitie // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. — 2009. — № 1. — 184 s.
11. Ioffe O. S. Pravootnoshenie po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu. — L. : Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta, 1949. — 144 s.
12. Kartashov V. N. Professional’naya yuridicheskaya deyatel’nost’ (voprosy teorii i praktiki) : uchebnoe posobie. Yaroslavl’ : Izd-vo Yarosl. un-ta, 1992. — 88 s.
13. Kartashov V. N. Yuridicheskaya deyatel’nost’: problemy teorii i metodologii : avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 1990. — 41 s.
14. Kartashov V. N. Yuridicheskaya praktika kak ob"ekt (predmet) pravovoj nauki // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii. — 2010. — № 1 (12). — S. 13—23.
15. Klejn N. I. O razvitii arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2010. — № 4 (160). — S. 5—20.
16. Lapina M. A. K voprosu o sushchnosti i strukture (sostave) administrativnyh pravootnoshenij // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. — 2009. — № 1. — 184 s.
17. Marshunov M. N. Prokurorsko-nadzornye pravootnosheniya : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — L., 1982. 25 s.
18. Matuzov N. I. Obshchie pravootnosheniya i ih specifika // Pravovedenie. — 1976. — № 3. — S. 23—33.
19. Mozolin V. P. Grazhdansko-processual’noe pravootnoshenie po sovetskomu pravu : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 1954. — 15 s.
20. Nikitenko Yu. M. Lokal’naya yuridicheskaya deyatel’nost’: obshcheteoreticheskij analiz : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — Saratov, 2013. — 30 s.
21. Sapun V. A. Pravoprimenitel’naya deyatel’nost’: osobennosti i struktura // Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. — 2005. — № 3. — S. 185—191.
22. Halfina R. O. Obshchee uchenie o pravootnoshenii. — M. : Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1974. — 352 s.
Review
For citations:
Golovko I.I. Parties Involved in Civil and Arbitrazh Procedural Relations with the Prosecutor’s Participation. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(1):168-178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.110.1.168-178
Views:
539
Email this article 