Categories “Public” and “Private” in the Constitutional Law of Russia
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.128.7.044-051
Abstract
The paper considers the categories “public” and “private” from the standpoint of the theory of constitutional law, identifies the main aspects of their legal nature, as well as their potential for determining the essence and correlation of other legal phenomena, the study of which is an urgent task of constitutional law. The categories “public” and “private” are studied from the standpoint of constitutional axiology and on the basis of the formal legal foundations of their consolidation in the constitutional legislation of Russia. On the basis of the indicated categories, the author examines the correlation between such concepts as “rights of the people” and “human rights,” the legal regime of “common goods,” in particular land and other natural resources, from the standpoint of “public” and “private;" people and characteristics of individual self-expression. As a result, it is concluded that the “public” and “private” can become an effective toolkit in the study of various fundamental categories of constitutional law; with their help, it is possible to determine the essence of legal phenomena, relationships between them and the setting of priorities in lawmaking and law enforcement.
About the Author
N. N. AveryanovaRussian Federation
Natalya N. Averyanova, Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of
Constitutional and Municipal Law
ul. Astrakhanskaya, d. 83, Saratov, Russia, 410012
References
1. Baburin S. N. Prava cheloveka i prava narodov: voprosy sovmestimosti // Prava cheloveka v sovremennom mire: novye vyzovy i trudnye resheniya : materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii / otv. red. T. A. Soshnikova. — M., 2014. — S. 35–39.
2. Voroncova N. L. Obrazovanie kak usluga // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2020. — № 4. — S. 56–62.
3. Galkin I. V. Problema obespecheniya effektivnoj realizacii zakonodatel’stva v sfere zashchity prav cheloveka v Rossijskoj Federacii // Lex russica. — 2016. — № 2. — S. 10–28.
4. Zelencov A. B. Konceptual’nye podhody k opredeleniyu administrativnogo prava: opyt sravnitel’no-pravovogo issledovaniya // Administrativnoe pravo i process. — 2019. — № 7. — S. 5–21.
5. Kaz’mina E. A. Problemy zakrepleniya prav rossijskogo naroda v Konstitucii Rossii // Konstitucionnoe i municipal’noe pravo. — 2013. — № 9. — S. 2–4.
6. Lihter P. L. Pravovaya kategoriya «obshchee blago» v interpretacii Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii // Lex russica. — 2019. — № 4. — S. 78–84.
7. Senyakin I. N., Zheldybina T. A. Konstituciya, vlast’ i svoboda v Rossii // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2014. — № 4. — S. 148–154.
8. Sivakov D. O. Eshche raz o prave sobstvennosti na prirodnye resursy // Zakonodatel’stvo i ekonomika. — 2006. — № 6. — S. 88–91.
9. Skuratov Yu. I. Kategoriya «narod» v konstitucionnom prave Rossii (evrazijskie tradicii i sovremennost’) // Lex russica. — 2017. — № 10. — S. 9–26.
Review
For citations:
Averyanova N.N. Categories “Public” and “Private” in the Constitutional Law of Russia. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(7):44-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.128.7.044-051