Financial Law in the Interdisciplinary Institution of Personal Dignity

By referring the dignity of the individual to meta-legal categories, considering it as a principle of law that forms an integrated inter-sectoral institution aimed at ensuring the implementation and protection of human rights, the author analyzes the role and place of financial law in the personal dignity concept. Taking into account the peculiarity of the subject matter and methodological basis of the financial and legal industry, the author concludes that the studied branch of law should be considered as a securing legal instrument of generating and implementing personal dignity, its dynamic essence through a unique legal mechanism of redistribution of material resources in the state. Acknowledging the positive binding as the basic legal means of such an instrument, the author analyzes the subjective rights of the individual in financial relations, in particular their property component, in two aspects of financial activity of the state and public legal entities: in the formation and distribution and use of public funds. In order to ensure the realization of the individual-centered spirit of financial law, the author concludes that it is necessary to carry out the doctrinal analysis and legal consolidation of the financial and legal status of the individual, to develop a system of so-called monetary rights of the individual in the process of formation, distribution and use of funds of the state and municipal entities.

personal dignity, individual, financial law, financial relations, public interest, positive binding, subjective rights, monetary rights, civil society, financial law regulation

1. Aliev T. T. Rol’ Konstitucionnogo Suda RF v sochetanii balansa chastnyh i publichnyh interesov v Rossii // Sovremennoe pravo. — 2010. — № 4. — S. 63–67.

2. Barsukova V. N. Ponyatie i osobennosti instituta chesti i dostoinstva cheloveka v rossijskom prave // Pravo. Zakonodatel’stvo. Lichnost’. — 2015. — № 1. — S. 9–16.

3. Gracheva E. Yu. Obespechenie publichnyh interesov v usloviyah rynka kak vazhnejshaya cel’ gosudarstvennogo finansovogo kontrolya // Ocherki finansovo-pravovoj nauki sovremennosti : monografiya / pod obshch. red. L. K. Voronovoj, N. I. Himichevoj. — M. — Har’kov : Pravo, 2011. — S. 205–228.

4. Gracheva E. Yu., Shchekin D. M. Kommentarii k dissertacionnym issledovaniyam po finansovomu pravu. — M. : Statut, 2016.

5. Dreval’ L. N. Sub"ekty rossijskogo finansovogo prava: teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie : dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2009.

6. Egorova M. A. Osobennosti soderzhaniya ponyatiya «publichnyj interes» dlya celej antimonopol’nogo regulirovaniya // Yurist. — 2019. — № 6. — S. 56–58.

7. Zapol’skij S. V. Diskussionnye voprosy teorii finansovogo prava. — M. : Eksmo, 2008.

8. Zapol’skij S. V. K voprosu o roli finansovogo prava v pravovoj sisteme Rossii // Finansovoe pravo. — 2010. — № 8. — S. 2–3.

9. Kabanova I. E. Princip balansa chastnyh i publichnyh interesov v doktrine i pravoprimenitel’noj praktike // Vlast’ zakona. — 2016. — № 2. — S. 74–84.

10. Karaseva M. V. Finansovoe pravootnoshenie. — M., 2011.

11. Kravec I. A. Dostoinstvo lichnosti v teorii i praktike sudebnogo konstitucionalizma // Zhurnal konstitucionnogo pravosudiya. — 2019. — № 1. — S. 11–20.

12. Kravec I. A. Dostoinstvo lichnosti: dialog teorii, konstitucionnyh norm, mezhdunarodnyh regulyatorov i social’noj real’nosti // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2019. — № 1. — S. 111–128.

13. Krolev S. V. «Denezhnye prava» cheloveka v perspektive sravnitel’noj teorii prava: germano-rossijskij aspekt // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. — 2013. — № 18. — S. 16–21.

14. Krylatova I. Yu. Otdel’nye aspekty dostoinstva lichnosti cherez prizmu realizacii strategii nacional’nogo razvitiya Rossii // Konstitucionnoe i municipal’noe pravo. — 2016. — № 9. — S. 32–34.

15. Loos E. V. Obshchaya harakteristika ponyatiya chesti i dostoinstva // Vestnik Barnaul’skogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. — 2016. — № 1. — S. 32–34.

16. Mamontov V. A. Pravovoe obespechenie publichnyh interesov v sfere predprinimatel’skoj deyatel’nosti : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2012.

17. Opaleva A. A., Opalev A. V. Zashchita dostoinstva lichnosti: moral’naya ili pravovaya problema? // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. — 2017. — № 3. — S. 179–181.

18. Selyukov A. D. Dialektika chastnyh i publichnyh interesov v processe osushchestvleniya finansovoj deyatel’nosti gosudarstva // Finansovoe pravo. — 2015. — № 11. — S. 10–14.

19. Tihomirov Yu. A. Publichno-pravovoe regulirovanie: dinamika sfer i metodov // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2001. — № 5.

20. Umanskaya V. P. Balans publichnyh i chastnyh interesov v administrativnom prave // Vlast’ zakona. — 2017. — № 1. — S. 69–79.

21. Habrieva T. Ya., Tihomirov Yu. A. Pravo i interesy // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2005. — № 12.

22. Himicheva N. I., Pokachalova E. V. Principy rossijskogo finansovogo prava kak bazisnye principy bankovskoj deyatel’nosti // Bankovskoe pravo. — 2013. — № 6. — S. 8–18.

23. Chelyshev M. Yu. Mezhotraslevoe pravovoe regulirovanie kak sredstvo obespecheniya publichnyh interesov v ekonomicheskoj sfere // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2005. — № 12.

24. Sheveleva N. A. Byudzhetnoe vyravnivanie v Rossii kak sposob garmonizacii mezhbyudzhetnyh otnoshenij (2000–2015) // Sravnitel’noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie. — 2015. — № 2. — S. 32–44.

25. Yadrihinskij S. A. Princip prioriteta publichnyh interesov v finansovoj deyatel’nosti gosudarstva: poisk kompromissa // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2020. — № 1. — S. 62–71.