Approaches to Understanding the Social Effect of Legal Institutions

The aim of the study is to assess the social effect in the conditions of the formation and operation of legal institutions: legal mentality, legal mindset, legal consciousness, legal culture in lawmaking and law enforcement practice. The theoretical and legal approach made it possible to reveal the legal nature of the category "legal mentality — legal mindset — legal consciousness — legal culture" in the interconnection expressed by dialectics and logic of manifestation, where the main criterion is the continuity and consistency of legal institutions. The paper establishes the dependence of the social effect on the effectiveness of legal institutions as a result of the civic consciousness of society and the state, and identifies the factors of the onset of legal implementation and/or legal expansion. The historical and legal approach reveals the variables of the continuity of legal institutions through the prism of the relationship between legal determinism and voluntarism, leading to legal implementation or legal expansion. Based on a comparative analogy of the features of harmonization ("consistency") and unification of norms ("universality") in the field of administrative legal relations, their direct relationship is established between organizational and legal activities. The analysis of historical and legal preconditions allows us to establish such legal risks as formalism, falsification, latency inherent in the transitional periods of the legal system, as well as the lack of historical and legal continuity and incompleteness of the formation of legal institutions. Therefore, the elimination of the risks of social effect provides for strengthening the imperative of the formation of legal institutions using educational, cultural and educational technologies as a tool for preserving the historical and legal continuity of legal consciousness and legal culture in achieving the social effect of civil society.

theoretical and legal approach, historical and legal approach, legal institution, social effect, legal mentality, legal awareness, legal culture, historical and legal continuity, legal expansion, legal implementation

1. Agapov D. A. Pravovaya kul’tura kak element grazhdanskogo obshchestva // Pravovaya kul’tura. — 2007. — № 1. — S. 10–14.

2. Babaeva V. K. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. — M., 2014. — 715 s.

3. Bojkov A. D. Pravovaya kul’tura i voprosy pravovogo vospitaniya : sbornik nauchnyh trudov. — M., 1974. — 202 s.

4. Bondarev A. S. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ i bezotvetstvennost’ — storony pravovoj kul’tury i antikul’tury sub"ektov prava. — SPb., 2008. — 185 s.

5. Vasil’ev A. A. Ohranitel’naya koncepciya prava v Rossii. — M., 2013. — 440 s.

6. Gubajdullin A. R. Preemstvennost’ v razvitii pravovoj sistemy // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.Е. Кутафafina (MGYuA). — 2017. — № 1 (32). — S. 81–90.

7. Dzhagaryan A. Ugolovno-pravovaya ekspansiya i problemy preyudicii v arbitrazhnom processe. 2019 // URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2019/5/30/ugolovno-pravovaya_ekspansiya_i_problemy_ preyudicii_v_ arbitrazhnom_processe (data obrashcheniya: 14.03.2020).

8. Zykov D. V. Nekotorye voprosy teorii yuridicheskogo myshleniya // Vestnik Volgogr. gos. un-ta. Seriya 5 : Yurisprud. — 2012. — № 1 (17). — S. 274–280.

9. Kartashov V. N. Aktual’nye problemy teorii i istorii pravovoj sistemy obshchestva. — Yaroslavl’, 2006. — 140 s.

10. Komarov S. A., Mal’ko A. V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. — M., 1999.

11. Magaziner Ya. M. Zametki o prave // Pravovedenie. — 2000. — № 5. — S. 215–216.

12. Men’chikov G. P. Determinizm XXI: problemy i resheniya. — M., 2015. — 96 s.

13. Mordovcev A. Yu., Mamychev A. Yu. Pravovaya mental’nost’ v nacional’no-kul’turnom prostranstve: osobennosti epohi preobrazovanij (cerkovnyj raskol XVII v.) // Territoriya novyh vozmozhnostej. Vestnik Vladivostokskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa. — 2017. — T. 9. — № 4. — S. 269–281.

14. Mordovcev A. Yu., Mamychev A. Yu. Pravovoj mentalitet kak osnovanie issledovaniya nacional’nogo prava i publichno-vlastnoj organizacii v XXI veke // Politicheskie nauki. ANI: ekonomika i upravlenie. — 2016. — T. 5. — № 1 (17). — S. 444–447.

15. Primak T. K., Serova O. A. Garmonizaciya, unifikaciya, standartizaciya v doktrine, pravoobrazovanii i pravoprimenenii // Yuridicheskij vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. — 2015. — № 3. — S. 71–78.

16. Rafalyuk E. V. Mezhdunarodnaya integraciya: metodologicheskie problemy issledovaniya // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2014. — № 3. — S. 42–52.

17. Sal’nikov V. P. Pravovaya kul’tura // Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava / otv. red. M. N. Marchenko. — M., 2007.

18. Senin I. N. Pravosoznanie, pravovaya kul’tura i pravovoj mentalitet // Mezhdunarodnyj nauchnoissledovatel’skij zhurnal. — 2015. — S. 243–254.

19. Sidorov P. I. Eticheskaya sindromologiya mental’noj epidemiologii // Ekologiya cheloveka. — 2015. — № 7. — S. 33–44.

20. Sinyukov V. N. Rossijskaya pravovaya sistema. — M., 2010.

21. Skorobogatov A. V. Pravovye zaimstvovaniya kak sredstvo sovershenstvovaniya nacional’noj pravovoj sistemy // Aktual’nye problemy ekonomiki i prava. — 2018. — № 1 (45), — S. 77–88.

22. Sokol’skaya L. V. Recepciya kak istoricheskaya forma pravovoj akkul’turacii // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2014. — № 8. — S. 1581–1589.

23. Solonevich I. L. Narodnaya monarhiya. — M., 2003.

24. Tkachev I. V. Globalizaciya v sfere chastnogo prava : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. — Krasnodar, 2011. — 38 s.

25. Homyakov A. S. Mnenie inostrancev o Rossii // Polnoe sobranie sochinenij : v 8 t. — Izd. 3-e, dop. — M., 1900. — T. 1.

26. Homyakov A. S. O starom i novom. — M., 1988.