Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Legal Thinking Style as a Legal Metaphenomenon

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.140.7.024-037

Abstract

Deepening of legal reflection in the field of theoretical generalizations enforces the need to search for new theoretical and methodological approaches. In this regard, in the legal field, the use of concepts adopted from the philosophy of science (paradigm, style of thinking, scientific picture of the world, research program, etc.) is becoming more and more frequent. When studying trends in the development of law, it will no longer be possible to do without using an epistemological potential of the concept of «style of legal thinking». The purpose of the study is to form a scientific understanding of the style of legal thinking as a legal metaphenomenon in the context of legal epistemology. To achieve this goal, the author analyzes the place of the concept of «style of legal thinking» in the theory of legal metaphenomena and gives his own definition of the term under consideration. The paper explains essential features, proposes a classification and outlines the prospects for using knowledge about the style of legal thinking. The concept of «style of legal thinking» is considered as an element of the theory of metaphenomena in law. The author draws a distinction between related concepts of «legal paradigm», «legal picture of the world», «legal tradition». The paper deals with prognostic and interpretative potential of knowledge about the style of legal thinking. Conclusions are drawn that the main criterion for distinguishing styles in jurisprudence is the change of epochs; the style of legal thinking accompanies the established legal order, contributes to its formation; legal and technical guidelines of the dominant style of thinking allow «preserving» the content and elemental composition of legal regulators of a certain era in law; epochs and corresponding styles of thinking not only replace each other, but also coexist; the question of the style of legal thinking of the era of artificial intelligence is natural, etc.

About the Author

V. V. Shakhanov
Vladimir Branch of RANEPA
Russian Federation

Vyacheslav V. Shakhanov, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of the State and Law

ul. Gorkogo, d. 59a, Vladimir, 600017



References

1. Avakyan T. V. Yuridicheskoe myshlenie v pravoprimenitelnom processe: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk — Rostov n/D, 2006. — 186 s.

2. Agamirov K. V. Ontologicheskie, gnoseologicheskie i akseologicheskie osnovaniya yuridicheskogo prognozirovaniya: filosofsko-pravovaya paradigma // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2021. — T. 25. — № 8. — S. 20–35.

3. Berzhel Zh.‑L. Obshchaya teoriya prava: per. s fr. / pod obshch. red. V. I. Danilenko. — M.: Nota Bene, 2000. — 576 s.

4. Bondar N. S. «Vechnye» konstitucionnye idealy: naskolko oni neizmenny v menyayushchemsya mire // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2020. — № 6. — S. 20–34.

5. Born M. Fizika v zhizni moego pokoleniya: sbornik statej / pod obshch. red. S. G. Suvorova. — M.: Izd-voinostr. lit., 1963. — 535 s.

6. Vasilev A. M. Pravovye kategorii: metodologicheskie aspekty razrabotki sistemy kategorij teorii prava: monografiya. — Repr. izd. — M.: Norma: Infra‑M, 2021. — 264 s.

7. Vedeneev Yu. A. Epistemologiya prava: mezhdu dogmaticheskim naslediem i yazykom novoj analitiki // Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast. — 2019. — № 1 (11). — S. 7–14.

8. Vedeneev Yu. A. Yuridicheskaya kartina mira: mezhdu dolzhnym i sushchim // Lex russica (Russkij zakon). —2014. — № 6. — S. 641–654.

9. Grafskij V. G. Vseobshchaya istoriya prava i gosudarstva: uchebnik dlya vuzov. — M.: Norma, 2007. — 752 s.

10. Davydova M. L. Professionalnoe myshlenie yuristov v sravnitelno-pravovom rakurse // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). — 2015. — № 1 (9). — S. 66–72.

11. Didikin A. B., Ogleznev V. V. Ontologiya i epistemologiya prava: analiticheskaya tradiciya: monografiya. —Novosibirsk: Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj un‑t, 2012. — 200 s.

12. Zhuravlev S. Yu. Kriminalisticheskij stil myshleniya: metodicheskoe soderzhanie i sootnoshenie s kvalifikacionnym ponimaniem rassleduemyh sobytij // Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii. — 2018. — № 1 (42). — S. 127–132.

13. Zajceva E. S. Yuridicheskoe prognozirovanie kak sredstvo ustanovleniya predelov pravovogo regulirovaniya // Nauchnyj vestnik Omskoj akademii MVD Rossii. — 2021. — T. 27. — № 1 (82). — S. 221–225.

14. Zykov D. V. Vidy yuridicheskogo myshleniya: metodologicheskoe i teoretiko-pravovoe obosnovanie: dis. …kand. yurid. nauk. — Volgograd, 2015. — 238 s.

15. Zyablova T. E., Mamchun V. V. Pravovye maksimy: problemy identifikacii // Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. — 2021. — № 1 (59). — S. 200–208.

16. Kleandrov M. I. Pravosudie i spravedlivost: monografiya. — M.: Norma: Infra‑M, 2022. — 364 s.

17. Kornev A. V. Cifrovye tekhnologii, pravovye riski i problema ih minimizacii // Aktualnye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2021. — T. 16. — № 9. — S. 11–20.

18. Kuklin S. V. Znachenie istochnikov (form) prava dlya formirovaniya stilya pravovogo myshleniya // Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya «Pravo». — 2018. — T. 18. — № 3. — S. 81–87.

19. Lektorskij V. A. Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya. — M.: Lenand, 2019. — 256 s.

20. Malinova I. P. Epistemologiya prava // Rossijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. — 1999. — № 3. — S. 7–41.

21. Malyshkin A. V. Integraciya prava i religii v konstitucionno-pravovom regulirovanii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. —2020. — № 10. — S. 45–54.

22. Melkevik B. Yuridicheskaya epistemologiya i «uzhe-pravo» // Pravovedenie. — 2015. — № 1 (321). — S. 6–49.

23. Mikeshina L. A. Determinaciya estestvenno-nauchnogo poznaniya. — L.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta, 1977. — 104 s.

24. Ovchinnikov A. I. Pravovoe myshlenie: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk — Rostov n/D, 2004. — 512 s.

25. Ovchinnikov A. I., Hakimov I. A. Pravoprimenenie, iskusstvennyj intellekt i kontekstualnoe znachenie principov prava // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. — 2020. — № 14. — S. 481–484.

26. Pashencev D. A., Chernogor N. N. Pravovaya tradiciya i pravoporyadok: sootnoshenie i vzaimovliyanie // Pravozashchitnik. — 2017. — № 1. — S. 2.

27. Petrova E. A. Rol yuridicheskogo myshleniya v mekhanizme pravotvorchestva // Rossijskij zhurnal pravovyh issledovanij. — 2019. — T. 6. — № 1 (20). — S. 67–73.

28. Poldnikov D. Yu. Institut dogovora v pravovoj nauke Zapadnoj Evropy XI–XVIII vekov: uch. Posobie / D. Yu. Poldnikov; Nac. issled. un‑t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». — M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, 2013. — 376 s.

29. Romashov R. A. Pravovoe znanie i yuridicheskoe myshlenie kak sistemnye elementy pravovoj kultury // Pravo i gosudarstvo: kulturologicheskoe izmerenie: sbornik trudov konferencii. — SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskij gumanitarnyj universitet profsoyuzov, 2019. — S. 30–33.

30. Ryahovskaya T. I. Preemstvennost v konstitucionnom prave v kontekste konstitucionnoj samobytnosti // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. — 2021. — T. 25. — № 2. — S. 30–44.

31. Savenkov A. N. Filosofiya prava i yuridicheskoe myshlenie: istoriya i sovremennost // Voprosy filosofii. —2019. — № 8. — S. 38–48.

32. Sanfilippo Ch. Kurs rimskogo chastnogo prava: uchebnik. — M.: Norma, 2007. — 463 s.

33. Sinyukov V. N. Pravo XX i XXI vekov: preemstvennost i novizna // Lex russica (Russkij zakon). — 2021. —T. 74. — № 2. — S. 9–20.

34. Smena tekhnologicheskih ukladov i pravovoe razvitie Rossii: monografiya / D. A. Pashencev, M. V. Zaloilo, A. A. Dorskaya. — M.: IZiSP: Norma: Infra‑M, 2021. — 184 s.

35. Timoshina E. V. Klassicheskoe i postklassicheskoe pravopominanie kak stili filosofsko-pravovogo myshleniya // Postklassicheskaya ontologiya prava: monografiya / pod red. I. L. Chestnova. — SPb.: Aletejya, 2016. —S. 218–294.

36. Habrieva T. Ya., Chernogor N. N. Budushchee prava. Nasledie akademika V. S. Styopina i yuridicheskaya nauka. — M.: Rossijskaya akademiya nauk; Institut zakonodatelstva i sravnitelnogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitelstve RF; Infra‑M, 2020. — 176 s.

37. Chestnov I. L. Metodologiya i metodika yuridicheskogo issledovaniya: uchebnoe posobie. — SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskij institut Generalnoj prokuratury Rossijskoj Federacii, 2004. — 128 s.

38. Chestnov I. L. Yuridicheskoe myshlenie v postklassicheskoj perspektive // Rossijskij zhurnal pravovyh issledovanij. — 2019. — T. 6. — № 1 (20). — S. 9–14.

39. Yuridicheskoe myshlenie: klassicheskaya i postklassicheskaya paradigmy: kol. monografiya / pod red. E. N. Tonkova, I. L. Chestnova. — SPb.: Aletejya, 2020. — 464 s.


Review

For citations:


Shakhanov V.V. Legal Thinking Style as a Legal Metaphenomenon. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2022;17(7):24-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.140.7.024-037

Views: 581


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)