The Category of Legitimate Interests in the Context of a Single Concept of Legal Understanding

The paper investgates problems of legal proceedings in civil and arbitration cases and ways of their resolution using procedural possibilities conceivable in the philosophical and legal formulation of the problem. Interests (legitimate interests) have been chosen as a very indicative and demanded category with effective instrumental properties. The study of their categorical features is included in the context of the analysis of a single concept of legal understanding. The unity of the concept of legal understanding as a common rational basis for taking into account the achievements of non-legal sciences, primarily philosophy, in the formation of a consistent view of law is opposed to the competitive «uniqueness» of traditional views on the essence of law and appropriation of a monopoly on truth. When revealing the unity of the concept in relation to the unity and generality of the approach to the philosophical and legal, general theoretical ideas of law, problems of the theory of the civil process, and their subject law enforcement imprint, special attention is paid to the analysis of the category of the ideal and transition from it to the category of the rational in the form of a comparison of personal and social experience, as well as their association with the form of judicial protection of rights and interests.

1. Alekseev N. N. Osnovy filosofii prava. — SPb., 1999.

2. Vlasenko N. A. Rezultativnost pravoponimaniya v sovremennoy yuridicheskoy nauke // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2015. — № 4.

3. Gambarov Yu. S. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Obshchaya chast. — M., 2003.

4. Gribanov V. P. Interes v grazhdanskom prave // Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. — M., 2000.

5. Gurvich M. A. Grazhdanskie protsessualnye pravootnosheniya i protsessualnye deystviya // Izbrannye trudy. T. 2. — Krasnodar, 2006.

6. Dubrovskiy D. I. Problema idealnogo. Subektivnaya realnost. — M., 2002.

7. Ilenkov E. V. Problema idealnogo // Voprosy filosofii. — 1979. — № 7.

8. Itunina N. B. Kontseptsiya idealnogo E. V. Ilenkova // Byulleten nauki i praktiki. — 2019. — T. 5. — № 10.

9. Kuznetsova S. V. Russkaya metafizika vseedinstva XIX–XX vv. v kontekste evropeyskoy neoplatonicheskoy traditsii. — M., 2018.

10. Lifshits M. A. Dialog s Evaldom Ilenkovym (Problema idealnogo). — M., 2003.

11. Kistyakovskiy B. A. Filosofiya i sotsiologiya prava. — SPb., 1998.

12. Maksimov V. A. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatiy «zakonnyy interes», «okhranyaemyy zakonom interes», «pravovoy interes», «yuridicheskiy interes» // Pravda i zakon. — 2017. — № 2.

13. Neretina S. S. Slovo i tekst v srednevekovoy kulture. Kontseptualizm Abelyara. — M., 1994.

14. Palekha R. R. Integrativnaya kontseptsiya pravoponimaniya kak metodologicheskaya paradigma prava // Vestnik VGU. Seriya «Pravo». — 2010. — № 1.

15. Pokrovskiy I. A. «Irratsionalnoe» v oblasti prava. — M., 1915.

16. Rakhmatullin R. Yu. Problema idealnogo v sovetskoy filosofii // Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federalnogo universiteta. Seriya «Gumanitarnye i sotsialnye nauki». — 2018. — № 6.

17. Smagina E. S. Uchastie gosudarstva v sovremennom tsivilisticheskom protsesse. — M., 2021.

18. Syrykh V. M. Rossiyskie pravovedy na perepute: materialisticheskiy ratsionalizm ili subektivnyy idealizm? // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2016. — № 1 (229).

19. Titova Yu. V. Teoriya kontsepta Vestnik UlGTU. — 2010. — № 3.

20. Chernykh I. I. O prave ne soblyudat zakon // Sluzhenie pravu. Pamyati professora V. A. Tumanova posvyashchaetsya. — M., 2017.

21. Shemeneva O. N. Yuridicheskiy interes v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: razvitie vzglyadov i sovremennoe znachenie // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. — 2016. — № 2.

22. Wolfendale P. Rationalist Inhumanism // URL: https://www.academia.edu/26697819/Rationalist_Inhumanism_Dictionary_Entry/.