On the «Field» (Trial by Combat) in Russian Law in the 15th — Early 17th Centuries

The «Field» (trial by combat) is a procedural institution known to the sources of law of medieval Rus’ at least from the 13th century. For several centuries, the «field» was widely used as a means of proof, and was subject to detailed legal regulation as early as in the 15th century. A number of major regulatory legal acts regulated the conditions and procedure for the trial by combat, its legal consequences and the amount of «field duties». The possibility of participating in such a trial was also regulated by law in detail. The surviving materials of judicial practice make it possible to clarify this information and assert that the participants to the trial of combat could have been not only the plaintiff, defendant, witnesses and their «hires,» but also the judges who considered the case before the reporting procedure. In addition, slaves who represented their masters and were not considered «hiremen» could take part in a trial by combat. It should also be noted that, despite the negative attitude towards trials by combat on the part of the Russian Church, monks and clergy did not refuse to participate in the «field». At the same time, the legal papers show that they understood the bias of this means of proof and a gradual decrease in the number of fights, which became rare as early as in the 16th century, although the final disappearance of traces of this legal institution from legislation occurred only in the 17th century.

1. Ampleeva T. Yu. Po zakonu russkomu. Istoriya ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Drevney Rusi. — M., 2005. — 228 s.

2. Antonov A. V. Klinskie akty XV–XVI vekov // Russkiy diplomatariy. — Vyp. 4. — M., 1998. — S. 53–110.

3. Belyaev I. D. Pole // Moskvityanin. — 1855. — T. 4. — № 13–14. — S. 33–62.

4. Vladimirskiy-Budanov M. F. Khrestomatiya po istorii russkogo prava. — Vyp. 2. — Yaroslavl, 1873. — 220 s.

5. Dyuvernua N. L. Istochniki prava i sud v Drevney Rossii. — M., 1869. — 420 s.

6. Ignatenko V. A. Sudebnye protsedury «ordalii» i «pole» v kontekste pravovoy kultury drevnerusskogo obshchestva kak proobrazy sudebnykh eksperimentov i ekspertiz: teoretiko-pravovoy aspekt // Formirovanie pravovoy kultury molodezhi v usloviyakh sovremennoy obrazovatelnoy sredy: materialy regionalnoy (mezhvuzovskoy) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. — Krasnoyarsk, 2021. — S. 31–36.

7. Izvestiya o Khozarakh, Burtasakh, Bolgarakh, Madyarakh, Slavyanakh i Russakh Abu-Ali Akhmeda ben Omar Ibn-Dasta, neizvestnogo dosele arabskogo pisatelya nachala X veka, po rukopisi Britanskogo muzeya. — SPb., 1869. — 214 s.

8. Istoriya otechestvennogo gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik i praktikum dlya vuzov / pod red. L. E. Laptevoy. — M., 2023. — 570 s.

9. Istoriya suda i pravosudiya v Rossii. T. 1 / otv. red. S. A. Koluntaev, V. M. Syrykh. — M., 2017. — 640 s.

10. Kobrin V. B. Vlast i sobstvennost v srednevekovoy Rossii (XV–XVI vv.). — M., 1985. — 280 s.

11. Meychik D. M. Gramoty XIV i XV vv. Moskovskogo arkhiva Ministerstva yustitsii: ikh forma, so derzhanie i znachenie v istorii russkogo prava. — M., 1883. — 168 s.

12. Mikhaylova I. B. Polevoy poedinok — norma prava v srednevekovoy Rusi // Istoriya povsednevnosti. — 2016. — № 1 (1). — S. 136–153.

13. Ospennikov Yu. V. Bozhiy sud v drevnerusskom prave // Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. — 2010. — № 1 (11). — S. 127–131.

14. Pakhman S. V. O sudebnykh dokazatelstvakh po drevnemu russkomu pravu, preimushchestvenno grazhdanskomu, v istoricheskom ikh razvitii. — M., 1851. — 222 s.

15. Pashkova T. I. Sudebnyy poedinok («pole») na stranitsakh zakonodatelnykh pamyatnikov srednevekovoy Rusi // Klio. — 2004. — № 3 (26). — S. 57–62.

16. Rossiyskoe zakonodatelstvo X–XX vekov. T. 1 / otv. red. V. L. Yanin. — M., 1984. — 520 s.

17. Rossiyskoe zakonodatelstvo X–XX vekov. T. 2 / otv. red. A. D. Gorskiy. — M., 1985. — 432 s.

18. Sergeevich V. I. Lektsii i issledovaniya po drevney istorii russkogo prava. — SPb., 1910. — 674 s.

19. Smirnov A. M. Sudebnyy poedinok v Drevney Rusi kak vid vnesudebnogo razbiratelstva // Rossiyskiy sudya. — 2014. — № 2. — S. 39–41.

20. Dewey H. W. Judges and the Evidence is the Muscovite Law // The Slavonic and East European Review. — Vol. 36. — No. 86. — P. 189–194.