Problems of Ensuring Inter‑Industry Terminological Uniformity in Determining the Legal Regime of Confiscation

The rapid complication of social relations regulated by law and the resulting convergence of private and public legal branches have become prerequisites for the formation of complex legal entities within the framework of domestic legislation. The latter should include confiscation, which is equally subject to regulation by both civil law as a basis for terminating property rights, and criminal law as another measure of a criminal legal nature that resolves the tasks of the criminal policy of the Russian Federation. At the same time, a detailed analysis of the provisions of Chapter 15.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, regulating the legal regime of confiscation, from the point of view of their compliance with civilistic terminology and civil legislation in general, clearly demonstrates the absolute failure of the legislator to achieve the necessary level of inter-branch unity in the legal regulation of this coercive measure. This circumstance is the cause of significant problems in ensuring the balance of private and public interests when assigning and executing confiscation as another measure of a criminal law nature.

1. Arenda: kommentariy k statyam 606–625 i 650–655 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Elektronnoe izdanie] / otv. red. A. G. Karapetov. — M.: M-Logos, 2023. — 816 s.

2. Borchenko D. Yu. Konfiskatsiya imushchestva kak mera ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera: ponyatie, priroda, sotsialnoe prednaznachenie i poryadok primeneniya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Kazan, 2007. — 20 s.

3. Goncharova V. A. Zashchita prav i okhranyaemykh zakonom interesov uchastnikov nedeystvitelnoy sdelki v grazhdanskom prave Rossii: monografiya. — M.: Yustitsinform, 2021. — 248 s.

4. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Podrobnyy postateynyy kommentariy s putevoditelem po zakonodatelstvu i sudebnoy praktike. Chast I / A. Yu. Bespalov, Yu. F. Bespalov, M. S. Varyushin [i dr.]; otv. red. Yu. F. Bespalov. — M.: Prospekt, 2017.

5. Grishaev S. P., Bogacheva T. V., Svit Yu. P. Postateynyy kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast pervaya // SPS «KonsultantPlyus», 2019.

6. Zalugin S. V. Pravo obshchey sobstvennosti: ponyatie, osushchestvlenie i zashchita: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2008. — 23 s.

7. Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy): v 2 t. / A. V. Brilliantov, G. D. Dolzhenkova, E. N. Zhevlakov [i dr.]; pod red. A. V. Brilliantova. T. 1. — 2-e izd. — M.: Prospekt, 2015.

8. Kornilova N. V. Ob otdelnykh sposobakh prinuditelnogo prekrashcheniya prava sobstvennosti // Rossiyskiy sledovatel. — 2016. — № 13. — S. 39–43.

9. Kuznetsova O. A., Stepanov V. V. Mezhotraslevaya priroda konfiskatsii imushchestva // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2018. — № 2. — S. 27–37.

10. Lebedev V. M. Sistemnyy analiz v prave // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo. — 2015. — № 4 (18). — S. 110–113.

11. Lysenko A. N. Ponyatie i vidy imushchestva v grazhdanskom prave Rossii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Samara, 2007. — 27 s.

12. Manankova R. P. Pravootnoshenie obshchey dolevoy sobstvennosti grazhdan po sovetskomu zakonodatelstvu // Obshchaya dolevaya sobstvennost. Pravovoy status chlenov semi: osnovnye trudy professora Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta R. P. Manankovoy. — M.: Statut, 2021. — S. 47–60.

13. Medvedev E. V. Klassifikatsiya mer ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera kak sredstv realizatsii funktsiy ugolovnogo prava // Rossiyskiy sledovatel. — 2021. — № 7.

14. Medvedev E. V. Funktsionalnye i soderzhatelnye razlichiya nakazaniya i inykh mer ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera // Advokatskaya praktika. — 2021. — № 4.

15. Otsenochnye priznaki v Ugolovnom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii: nauchnoe i sudebnoe tolkovanie: nauch.prakt. posobie / Yu. I. Antonov, V. B. Borovikov, A. V. Galakhova [i dr.]; pod red. A. V. Galakhovoy. — M.: Norma, 2014.

16. Svirin Yu. A. Kogerentnost sistemy prava // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2015. — № 6 (55). — S. 50–55.

17. Svirin Yu. A. Sistema prava kak pravovaya realnost na sovremennom etape // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2016. — № 1 (162). — S. 26–33.

18. Sinitsyn S. A., Pozdnysheva E. V. Grazhdansko-pravovye sanktsii za sovershenie korruptsionnykh pravonarusheniy // Zakonodatelstvo i ekonomika. — 2015. — № 5. — S. 7–10.

19. Sukhanov E. A. Veshchnoe pravo: nauchno-poznavatelnyy ocherk. — M.: Statut, 2017.

20. Tetyuev S. V. Zashchita prav supruga pri nalozhenii aresta na sovmestno nazhitoe imushchestvo po ugolovnomu delu // Sudya. — 2018. — № 7. — S. 61–64.

21. Torgovchenkov V. I. Aktualnye voprosy naznacheniya konfiskatsii avtotransporta kak mery ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera // Zakonnost. — 2023. — № 2.

22. Chelyshev M. Yu. Mezhotraslevoe pravovoe regulirovanie kak sredstvo obespecheniya publichnykh interesov v ekonomicheskoy sfere // Mezhotraslevye svyazi grazhdanskogo prava (k 50-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M. Yu. Chelysheva): Liber Amicorum / otv. red. D. Kh. Valeev. — M.: Statut, 2021. — S. 272–307.

23. Chelyshev M. Yu. O nekotorykh tendentsiyakh razvitiya grazhdansko-pravovoy otrasli i dinamike sistemy mezhotraslevykh svyazey grazhdanskogo prava // Mezhotraslevye svyazi grazhdanskogo prava (k 50-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M. Yu. Chelysheva): Liber Amicorum / otv. red. D. Kh. Valeev. — M.: Statut, 2021. — S. 308–317.

24. Chelyshev M. Yu. Osnovnye ucheniya o mezhotraslevykh svyazyakh grazhdanskogo prava: monografiya // Mezhotraslevye svyazi grazhdanskogo prava (k 50-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya doktora yuridicheskikh nauk, professora M. Yu. Chelysheva): Liber Amicorum / otv. red. D. Kh. Valeev. — M.: Statut, 2021. — S. 423–602.

25. Shishkina O. E., Burtseva S. S. Pravovaya opredelennost v praktike Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskiy region: ekonomika, politika, pravo. — 2021. — № 3. — S. 166–181.