Application of the Most Favored Nation Principle as an Instrument of Financial Sanctions against Russia
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.171.2.146-153
Abstract
The paper analyzes the regulatory legal acts of the USA, Great Britain, Canada and Australia, which became the basis for the abolition of the most favored nation status in relation to Russia in 2022. The hypothesis is examined that unilateral restrictive measures (financial sanctions) imposed by WTO member states to introduce additional customs tariffs in relation to other WTO members are illegal and violate the principle of non-discrimination in international trade. The paper examines the tendency to transform the goals and objectives of using the most favored nation principle and national treatment: from the original (removing barriers to world trade, opening new markets) to the current ones in the form of sanctions policy instruments. Manipulation of these principles depending on the economic interests of individual states is contrary to WTO norms. The approach of justifying financial sanctions by the aim of protecting essential national security interests through Article XXI (b) (iii) of GATT 1947 is criticized.
About the Author
I. V. RyzhkovaRussian Federation
Irina V. Ryzhkova, Master of Laws, Postgraduate Student, Department of Administrative and Financial Law
Moscow
References
1. Gorlov S. A. Sovershenno sekretno: Alyans Moskva — Berlin, 1920–1933 gg. (Voenno-politicheskie otnosheniya SSSR — Germaniya). — M.: Olma-Press, 2001. — 352 s.
2. Grimm E. D. Sbornik dogovorov i drugikh dokumentov po istorii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy na Dalnem Vostoke (1842–1925). — M.: Izdanie Instituta vostokovedeniya imeni N.N. Narimanova, 1927. — 219 s.
3. Krivushin I. V. Rossiysko-avstraliyskie otnosheniya do i posle ukrainskogo krizisa // Kontury globalnykh transformatsiy: politika, ekonomika, pravo. — 2019. — T. 12. — № 1. — S. 133–158. — DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-1-133-158.
4. Smbatyan A. S. Mezhdunarodnye torgovye spory v GATT/VTO: izbrannye resheniya (1952–2005 gg.). — M.: Volters Kluver, 2006. — 326 s.
5. Shepenko R. A. Mezhdunarodnye nalogovye pravila: v 2 ch. — Ch. 1. — M.: Yurlitinform, 2012. — 510 s.
6. Yungblyud V. T., Ilin D. V. Popravka Dzheksona — Venika i razvitie sovetsko-amerikanskikh otnosheniy v 1972–1975 gg. // Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. — 2020. — T. 13(2). — S. 7–39. — DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2020-2-71-7-39.
7. Fietta S. Most Favoured Nation Treatment and Dispute Resolution under Bilateral Investment Treaties: A Turning Point? // URL: https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/wp-content/uploads/arbitrationarbitrationlawpub1395_1.pdf.
8. Wang A. History of the MFN Clause in International Law // The Interpretation and Application of the Most-Favored-Nation Clause in Investment Arbitration. Brill, Nijhoff, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004517899_003.
9.
Review
For citations:
Ryzhkova I.V. Application of the Most Favored Nation Principle as an Instrument of Financial Sanctions against Russia. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(2):146-153. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.171.2.146-153