Civil Law Regime of Metaverse, Virtual and Augmented Reality Objects

In civil circulation, due to its digitalization, virtual objects that, unlike a real object of the surrounding world in its usual sense, have a digital form wihout a real shell, are widespread. The civil law regime of virtual objects is not defined in the current legislation. Meanwhile, in the context of the development of metaverse concepts, this problem and the search for ways to solve it is becoming increasingly urgent. Determining the legal regime of objects created by the user of the platform on which access to virtual reality is provided, augmented reality objects, as well as objects existing and created within the metaverse, where the user’s usual activities can be carried out, is ambiguous in scholarship and jurisprudence. This study was undertaken to determine the features of the civil law regime of objects created in virtual reality, augmented reality, and in the metaverse. It was concluded that the regimes of familiar civil law objects (property, results of intellectual activity, intangible benefits, services) can be extended to the objects under consideration. However, the material legal concept does not fully reflect the legal nature of the objects under study. Therefore, virtual objects that copy things of the physical world, in essence, can be recognized as other property rights. At the same time, the intellectual property rules can be applied to these objects only if they are created as a result of a person’s creative efforts.

1. Bunina N. Pravovaya priroda virtualnykh obektov v kompyuternykh igrakh // URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/11/30/pravovaya_priroda_virtualnyh_obektov_v_kompyuternyh_igrah (data obrashcheniya: 01.02.2022).

2. Vasilevskaya L. Yu. Token kak novyy obekt grazhdanskikh prav: problemy yuridicheskoy kvalifikatsii tsifrovogo prava // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2019. — № 5. — S. 111–119. — DOI: 10.17803/19941471.2019.102.5.111-119.

3. Grin E. S., Koroleva A. G. Formirovanie bazovykh modeley okhrany tekhnologiy virtualnoy i dopolnennoy realnosti v sfere prava intellektualnoy sobstvennosti // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2019. — № 6. — S. 90–97.

4. Dremlyuga R. I. Virtualnaya realnost: obshchie problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2020. — T. 15. — № 9. — S. 39–49.

5. Koroleva A. G. Subekty intellektualnykh prav v oblasti tekhnologiy virtualnoy i dopolnennoy realnosti // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2020. — № 6. — S. 133–142.

6. Lisachenko A. V. Pravo virtualnykh mirov: novye obekty grazhdanskikh prav // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. — 2014. — № 2. — S. 104–110.

7. Maleina M. N. Pravovoy rezhim zdaniy i sooruzheniy, ne prikreplennykh k poverkhnosti zemli // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2023. — № 2. — S. 33–42.

8. Nigmatzyanova D. A. NFT kak osnova ekonomiki metavselennykh // Pravo i biznes. — 2022. — № 4. — S. 26–31.

9. Ruzakova O. A., Grin E. S. Voprosy zashchity intellektualnoy sobstvennosti v oblasti tekhnologiy virtualnoy i dopolnennoy realnosti (VR, AR) // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. — 2020. — № 3. — S. 502–523.

10. Savelev A. I. Pravovaya priroda virtualnykh obektov, priobretaemykh za realnye dengi v mnogopolzovatelskikh igrakh // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. — 2014. — № 1. — S. 127–150.

11. Sannikova L. V., Kharitonova Yu. S. Tsifrovye aktivy: pravovoy analiz: monografiya. — M.: 4 Print, 2020. — 304 s.

12. Kholodnaya E. V. O pravovoy kontseptsii metavselennykh // Lex russica. — 2024. — № 3. — S. 116–128.

13. Chetvergov D. S. Pravovoy rezhim virtualnogo imushchestva // Pravo i biznes. — 2021. — № 3. — S. 33–39.

14. Assael S. Skin in the Game // URL: http://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/18510975/how-counter-strike-turned-teenager-compulsive-gambler (data obrashcheniya: 01.02.2022).