Use of Specialized Knowledge in Criminal Proceedings: Comparative Legal Analysis of the Legislation of the Russian Federation and Selected Foreign States

Issues related to the use of specialized knowledge in criminal proceedings remain relevant despite existing legislative provisions for expert and specialist involvement. The existence of different approaches in different branches of law to the interpretation of the concepts of “special knowledge” and “special expertise” causes not only ongoing scientific discussions in this regard, but also difficulties in law enforcement practice. Rapid legislative development necessitates revising existing provisions to enhance the effectiveness of these participants. A comparative analysis of various states’ legislation allows leveraging positive foreign experiences for legislative optimization--especially crucial in the digital age. However, this is not about blind replication, but about developing a distinct model for utilizing special knowledge in criminal proceedings, enabling more effective application amid digitalization.

1. Antonovich E. K. Pravovaya pomoshch po ugolovnym delam v tsifrovom obshchestve // Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava. — 2021. — T. 16. — № 11 (132). — S. 167–173.

2. Antonovich E. K., Voskobitova L. A., Voronin M. I., Przhilenskiy V. I., Sheremetev I. I. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo: transformatsiya teoreticheskikh predstavleniy i regulirovaniya v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii. — M., 2024. — 288 s.

3. Belonosov V. O. Dokazatelstva i dokazyvanie po UPK Frantsii // Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. — 2023. — T. 9. — № 4. — S. 62–73.

4. Vilkova T. Yu. Dosudebnoe proizvodstvo v usloviyakh razvitiya tsifrovykh tekhnologiy v Rossii i za rubezhom: sravnitelnyy analiz // Rossiyskaya pravovaya sistema v usloviyakh chetvertoy promyshlennoy revolyutsii: materialy VI Moskovskogo yuridicheskogo foruma XVI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 3 ch. Ch. 3. — M., 2019. — S. 236–240.

5. Vilkova T. Yu. Obyazatelnoe audio- i videoprotokolirovanie sudebnogo zasedaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve v Rossii i za rubezhom: sravnitelno-pravovoy analiz // Evolyutsiya gosudarstva i prava: problemy i perspektivy: sbornik nauchnykh trudov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 55-letiyu YuZGU (28–29 marta 2019 goda) / redkol.: A. A. Gorokhov (otv. red.); Yugo-Zap. gos. un-t. — Kursk, 2019. — S. 181–185.

6. Lazareva V. A. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse. — M., 2013. — 359 s.

7. Maksurov A. A. Oblasti primeneniya spetsialnykh znaniy v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. — 2023. — № 6. — S. 91–98.

8. Orlov Yu. K. Sovremennye problemy dokazyvaniya i ispolzovaniya spetsialnykh znaniy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. — M., 2016. — 213 s.

9. Rossinskaya E. R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, administrativnom i ugolovnom protsesse: monografiya. — 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. — M., 2022. — 576 s. — URL: https://znanium.com/catalog/document?id=389911.

10. Selina E. V. Primenenie spetsialnykh poznaniy v ugolovnom protsesse. — M., 2002. — 144 s.

11. Sorokotyagin I. N., Sorokotyagina D. A. Sudebnaya ekspertiza (ekspertologiya): ucheb. posobie. — Ekaterinburg, 2000. — 137 s.

12. Tsokolova O. I., Nikitina I. E. Organizatsiya sudebnoy ekspertizy v evropeyskikh stranakh: istoricheskiy aspekt i sovremennye tendentsii // Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii. — 2011. — № 2. — S. 119–123.

13.