Preview

Actual Problems of Russian Law

Advanced search

Legal Fictions as a Mechanism for Advancing Legal Development

https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2026.184.3.021-031

Abstract

The paper examines the essence and role of legal fiction as a mechanism for facilitating progress in law. It highlights the adverse consequences resulting from the improper incorporation of fictions into legislation and their misapplication in practice. The author argues that one source of such consequences lies in superficial and methodologically unsound theoretical approaches to the phenomenon of legal fiction, including the conflation of its legal and everyday meanings and the use in scholarly discourse of such terms as «legal illusion» and «irrebuttable presumption», which in substance amount to forms of fiction. The paper also addresses the frequent conflation of legal fictions with fictitious phenomena (facts, states, etc.). In addition, it examines artificial (fictitious) subjects of law, with particular attention to the classical legal fiction of the juridical person and to the state, which is essentially constructed as a legal person. Finally, the study notes that processes of digitalization and robotization are giving rise to new fictitious subjects and objects, including artificial intelligence.

About the Author

O. V. Tanimov
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation

Oleg V. Tanimov - Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Theory of the State and Law.

Moscow



References

1. Antonchenko V. V. Kriterii progressa gosudarstva i prava // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2025. — T. 29. — № 1. — S. 95–106.

2. Arkhipov S. I. Subekt prava v tsifrovuyu epokhu // Vestnik Gumanitarnogo universiteta. — 2023. — № 4 (43). — S. 7–16.

3. Barsukov A. Yu. Pravovoy progress kak yuridicheskaya kategoriya: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Saratov, 2004. — 191 s.

4. Bratus S. N. Yuridicheskie litsa v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. — M.: Yurid. izd-vo MYu SSSR, 1947. — 364 s.

5. Burde P. Sotsiologiya politiki / per. s fr.; sost., obshch. red. i predisl. N. A. Shmatko. — M.: Socio-Logos, 1993. — 333 s.

6. Volkov V. E. Tsifrovoe pravo. Obshchaya chast: uchebnoe posobie.— Samara: Izd-vo Samarskogo universiteta, 2022. — 111 s.

7. Gadzhiev G. A. Yuridicheskaya kartina mira. — SPb.: SPbGUP, 2016. — 32 s.

8. Gervagen L. L. Razvitie ucheniya o yuridicheskom litse. — SPb.: Tip. I. N. Skorokhodova, 1888. — 91 s.

9. Kaliforniyskiy sud postanovil, chto pchely mogut byt rybami // URL: https://news.mail.ru/society/51605224/ (data obrashcheniya: 31.03.2025).

10. Kashanina T. V. Sushchnost i soderzhanie prava: differentsirovannyy podkhod // Lex russica. — 2011. — T. 70. — № 5. — S. 873–889.

11. Kovalenko A. S. Yuridicheskie fiktsii v osnovakh konstitutsionnogo stroya Rossii // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. — 2024. — № 1. — S. 151–157. — URL: https://www.vestnykeps.ru/0124/30.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 28.01.2025).

12. Makarenko O. V. Yuridicheskoe litso kak pravovaya kategoriya // URL: cyberleninka.ru/article/n/yuridicheskoe-litso-kak-pravovaya-kategoriya/viewer (data obrashcheniya: 28.01.2025).

13. Malko A. V., Semikin D. S., Lyukina O. V. Sudebnaya politika i sudebno-pravovoy progress. — M.: Yurlitinform, 2013. — 205 s.

14. Morkhat P. M. Pravosubektnost iskusstvennogo intellekta v sfere prava intellektualnoy sobstvennosti: grazhdansko-pravovye problemy: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.03. — M., 2018. — 420 s.

15. Nersesyants V. S. Filosofiya prava. — M.: Infra-M, 1997. — 647 s.

16. Saudovskaya Araviya predostavila grazhdanstvo robotu // URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3454104 (data obrashcheniya: 10.04.2025).

17. Suvorov N. S. Ob yuridicheskikh litsakh po rimskomu pravu. — M.: Statut, 2000. — 299 s.

18. Tanimov O. V. Razvitie yuridicheskikh fiktsiy v epokhu Novogo vremeni // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. — 2014. — № 4. — S. 4–18.

19. Tanimov O. V. Teoriya yuridicheskikh fiktsiy: monografiya. — M.: Prospekt, 2016. — 225 s.

20. Tanimov O. V. Yuridicheskoe litso — klassicheskaya fiktsiya v prave // Yuridicheskiy mir. — 2013. — № 5. — S. 45–47.

21. Tunkin G. I. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava. — M.: Zertsalo, 2015. — 416 s.

22. FSSP priravnyala molchanie kollektorov v trubku k psikhologicheskomu davleniyu. Kak dolzhny i ne dolzhny vesti sebya vzyskateli s dolzhnikami // URL: https://www.rbc.ru/finances/23/12/2021/61c333709a794704735cdb1a (data obrashcheniya: 10.05.2025).

23. Yastrebov O. A. Pravosubektnost elektronnogo litsa: teoretiko-metodologicheskie podkhody // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN. — 2018. — T. 13. — № 2. — S. 36–55.


Review

For citations:


Tanimov O.V. Legal Fictions as a Mechanism for Advancing Legal Development. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2026;21(3):21-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2026.184.3.021-031

Views: 501

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-1471 (Print)
ISSN 2782-1862 (Online)